• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different After the 1867 'Reform Act', which gave working men the vote, a few local campaign groups began to form; using gentle methods to gain support from town councils and regional communities. Several national organisations were also created to raise awareness for women's suffrage. Societies such as the Primrose League and the Women's Liberal Foundation organised many meetings and presented large petitions to parliament. The year 1897 brought around the culmination of small, regional campaign groups into a nationwide organisation. This group was founded under the power of Millicent Garret Fawcett and was called the National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies (NUWSS). With more than fifty thousand members to fight for one cause, the newly-formed NUWSS looked set to conquer over defiant minds in parliament. The main aim of the NUWSS was to gain a vote for women by using passive methods. ...read more.

Middle

The Liberal Government did not seem to be proposing a bill for a female vote. Between 1906 and 1909 members of the WSPU chained themselves to railings in Downing Street and Buckingham Palace, trying to make their message reach the ears of all. Stone throwing quickly became a method that was adopted by campaigners against 10 Downing Street. From a public point of view the NUWSS seemed to turn a blind eye towards this new breed of protest, they started to see the hard work that had been done in the past was now beginning to be overshadowed by the attention-seeking protests of the WSPU. In July 1909, Marion Dunlop-Wallace was sent to prison and became the first suffragette to use hunger-strike methods. The WSPU adopted this tactic because refusing to eat would mean being freed before the sentence ended. The Government quickly became wise towards the prisoners and introduced force-feeding for uncooperative inmates. ...read more.

Conclusion

Apart from all of this violence the WSPU still continued it's campaign using peaceful methods such as organised discussions and the writing of leaflets. At this point a split starts to form between the WSPU and the NUWSS due to the violent nature of the Suffragette campaign, members of the NUWSS that previously respected the work of the Suffragettes now condemned them on the basis that they were not helping the cause. With the violent protests from the WSPU now reaching a climax major ruptures within the organisation began to form. The Pethick-Lawrences who had been a great help in past years by funding the group's activities now left because they felt that the WSPU were now reaching the stage of being terrorists. Without the financial backing that they once had many women decided to also leave, joining more traditional campaign groups with passive methods. Although the mutinies got in the way of progress the WSPU carried on regardless of the doubters and continued their fight until the beginning of the First World War. Ollie Arci ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work