• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were Different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Assignment 1 Tom Harrison Question 2 Mrs. Theakston Describe the Ways in Which the Methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were Different There were many differences between the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes and some similarities, both arising from the nature of the membership and the leadership of the two unions. The main common ground between the two groups was their aim; both campaigned for votes for women. They differed on the means of achieving this goal. They even supported the same political parties; initially the Liberals but after 1911 they started supporting Labour; each followed the party most committed to their cause. A further similarity was the frustration felt after postponements of Suffrage bills, encouraging both Unions to make their actions more attention seeking: the Suffragettes started chaining themselves to railings - like Edith New who chained herself to railings near Downing Street in 1908 - following their motto, "Deeds not words," and the Suffragists began ignoring the census and evading tax. ...read more.

Middle

Public opinion differed over the tactics of the Suffragists and Suffragettes. Some said that the militancy of the Suffragettes was too masculine; they believed that there was no such thing as bad publicity and many people believed that their methods would delay women getting the vote because they made women seem irresponsible. The Suffragists were dissimilar to the Suffragettes in their belief that responsible behaviour would earn the vote. They were criticised for being ineffective as they did not receive enough publicity because their actions were not as headline grabbing as those of the Suffragettes. A further difference between the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes was that the Suffragists were willing to befriend influential men to help their cause whereas Suffragettes were sometimes described as, "Anti-men." Suffragists believed in all non-violent methods of campaigning including befriending politicians to get their voice heard in Parliament to help the cause. ...read more.

Conclusion

The leadership personalities differentiated the two groups. Emmeline Pankhurst who headed the Suffragettes was a tough, uncompromising character who believed that women should not be afraid to take strong action to get their point of view across. Possibly, it was this style of leadership that led to dissention and splinter groups amongst members of the Suffragettes. Millicent Fawcett, however, held the belief that any violence or trouble would lead men to believe that women should not be trusted with the right to vote. Overall, I believe that the two groups had differences of style and tactics but shared a similar desire to be heard in their campaign for female Suffrage. Or as Paula Bartley puts it: "The Suffrage movement was one story with several subplots rather than totally different sagas...they shared a common goal - votes for women - and only differed on the ways to achieve it." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were ...

    They saw that the suffragists had taken 35 years and still had not achieved their main goal of achieving the vote for women. So they decided to create a new group, which would have more unconventional methods, which they believed were more likely to be effective.

  2. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    The NUWSS - commonly known as the Suffragists - used peaceful and law abiding tactics such as speeches, peaceful marches and petitions, by using their group motto: make haste slowly with persuasion . Through using these tactics the suffragists gained respect; however the group was made up of upper class

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different

    She described her campaign as a "glacier, it might be slow moving but it was powerful and unstoppable". The WSPU was founded at a meeting in Emmeline Pankhurst's house and she led the organisation with very different views and approaches to Millicent Fawcett's.

  2. Describe the Ways in Which the Methods Of The

    century was seen as obscene, a few of the ten women were quite well known in society and it made some people quite angry, leading the WSPU to have more sympathy, funds, and new members. It gained a little publicity but women still wanted more, and as a consequence, the

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    to letter boxes, seared golf courses with acid, burnt down sports pavilions, broke street lamps, stomped on flower beds, painted "Votes for Women" on the seats at Hampstead Heath, plugged up keyholes with lead pellets, slashed the cushions of train seats, staged false fire alarms, threw rocks at the windows

  2. The suffragettes and suffragists

    The Cat and Mouse Act allowed the Suffragettes to go on a hunger strike and let them get weaker and weaker. Force feeding was not used. When the Suffragettes were very weak they were released from prison. If they died out of prison, this was of no embarrassment to the government.

  1. how are suffragists and suffragettes different?

    The sympathy would make people be in favour of the women and also if the women would die for their points to become true wouldn't they go to any extent for it to happen? This must of made people fear them and the fear could have got extra votes for being in favour of it.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    At election time they helped and supported any candidate who supported the women's right to vote, they held processions, met politicians, met the prime minister and held public debates. Not one of their methods used violence in anyway; they put their argument across in a well mannered and structured way.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work