• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were different

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were different. There were two main groups in Britain during the early 20th century who were both fighting for the same cause, women's suffrage. Although in the end they both wanted the same outcome, they went about trying to win the vote in completely different ways. the first group to be established lead by Millicent Fawcett were the suffragists, they were made up of mainly middle class well educated women, and the suffragists believed the best way to get the vote was through peaceful tactics such as petitions and peaceful marches. Groups began to set up all over the country showing their support for this movement, and eventually the unified in 1890, to work together to fight for women's suffrage. Their plan was to operate within the law, not offend anyone and act as women were expected to in their day, which was for those who were in the higher classes shop, eat lunch and attend social events along with anything else their husband told them to. ...read more.

Middle

possible whether it was legal or illegal, as they felt any actions were justifiable in their fight for the suffrage they felt women deserved. A significant example of this is when Emmeline's daughter christabel spat in a policeman's face, she was subsequently arrested tried and sentenced to a custodial sentence which is what she wanted as it gained huge publicity for their cause but it was bad publicity society in general was outraged at what this woman had done. They saw any publicity as good publicity, as it put their issue in the public eye. The suffragists always used the same method, a peaceful protest. They would create petitions, hand out leaflets, they would politely ask MP's to attend their lobbies and meetings and listen to their thoughts. They believed their peaceful protest and strength of argument would win over the support of the men in high up places and therefore give them what they wanted. On the other hand the suffragettes had a much more intense way of campaigning. ...read more.

Conclusion

There were even plans to make and set off bombs in public places. The Suffragettes were getting out of hand had turned into a terrorist group, while the suffragists continued with their petitions and letter writing. The main differences in methods between the two groups are that the suffragists had a peaceful rigid plan which they stuck with throughout, whereas the suffragettes had a disruptive campaign that escalated into an out of hand violent campaign. They started off with the same aims but then they divided into two groups with opposite attitude. The suffragists felt that the suffragettes were jeopardising the years of work they had put towards the cause through their violent actions, and although they were gaining publicity it was bad publicity which was loosing them support, and they were even referred to as the cause's worst enemy. The suffragists saw the government as their key to gaining suffrage whereas the suffragettes saw men as their enemy and felt they had to pressure and intimidate them into giving women suffrage. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. What were the main differences between the suffragettes and the suffragists?

    The Suffragettes were a lot more violent and favoured such things as throwing stones at the prime ministers house and smashing windows to get themselves noticed. On one hand the Suffragists favoured peaceful protests and believed their campaign to be like a glacier, slow but unstoppable.

  2. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    Despite both the groups having the same overall ambition of gaining the voting rights for women, their tactics were very differentty and the women hoped they could use it to try and convince Prime Minister Asquith to put his feelings aside and give the women the vote.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different

    The failures of the Suffragists were that they did lose women from their campaign because they believed the campaign was too slow and that the Suffragettes methods were much more efficient. They were easily ignored by the government because of their gentle nature and they had achieved little by the time the Suffragettes were formed and captivating the media's attention.

  2. Describe the ways in which the method used by the Suffragists and the Suffragettes ...

    So meetings were held and also demonstrations were given to the general public. The group then as time went on they kept on becoming more violent, they were going around smashing and damaging shop windows and many other things. But the police were slightly scarred by this behaviour; as they did not want to man handle the upper class.

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the Suffragettes were ...

    They would print political cartoons on postcards and on one occasion ballooned over London showering leaflets into the air.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

    clothes had torn, their banner trampled on and then dragged out of the hall and thrown onto the streets. After this they would be picked up by the police and then poisoned in jai without trial. Parliamentary lobbying in terms of trying to get political parties to change their policy

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were ...

    These include the Labour party and the radical suffragists. They mostly backed up the labour party due to their campaign promises, such as giving equal rights and future voting privileges. The radical suffragists were a different type of suffragist; ones who later started performing hunger strikes, only to be force fed in prison.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    This was done to show how rational these women were and that women deserved the vote. They wanted to let the government and public know that women were very respectable and could be entirely trusted with the vote. They intended their good behaviour to impress the government and that after

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work