• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were different?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Describe the ways in which the methods of the suffragists and the suffragettes were different? The suffragists and suffragettes were the two main women's groups that campaigned for women's right to vote. The two groups were different in many ways yet had their similarities. The suffragists used peaceful methods to convey their message for women's suffrage and many of them belonged to the NUWSS (their were smaller groups for the suffragist movement but the NUWSS was the one leading the way). Similarly the suffragettes had their own organisation known as the WSPU (again their were smaller groups that were pro suffragette). The suffragettes were a more militant organisation that sometimes used violence to further its aims. Originally the WSPU (Women's social political union) and the NUWSS (National union of Women's Suffrage Societies) was under one flag as they were fighting for the same objective. However the WSPU felt that the NUWSS approach was far too slow and it was not getting anywhere they decided that they would have to become more militant in order to get their point across. ...read more.

Middle

There were also a number of differences between the two parties both stepped up their bid for the vote after 1912 whereas before they didn't push as much. The NUWSS used peaceful methods both before and after 1912 they organised meetings to decide what their next method was going to be, they presented petitions showing the government how strong the campaign for women's suffrage was. After 1912 the NUWSS continued with what they did before, however one important change came around. They organised more marches and provided funding for the labour party so that they could get in power and give women the vote this was known as the election fighting fund and was aimed at helping the labour party as they were most likely at giving women the right to vote. The WSPU used a different tactic they used militant action to get their point across. The WSPU wanted to gain the vote quickly so they decided to go to the extremes and try and get people's attention so that the vote could be gained quickly. ...read more.

Conclusion

All of these actions were done in order to get publicity and people's attention. Despite them achieving their aim of publicity these actions resulted in the Women's suffrage campaign receiving a bad name, people disliked them and went back to their old thought process that women were irrational and not reliable enough to receive the vote. Due to this excessive militant action the NUWSS decided to disassociate themselves with the WSPU however this made no difference as the whole of the women's suffrage campaign was labelled as being 'extreme'. The excessive militant action by the WSPU resulted in a backwards step for the suffrage campaign. It showed the clear difference between the two groups and how each one wanted to achieve its goal. The NUWSS stated that it was like a 'glacier movement slow but steady' yet it would eventually achieve its aim whereas the militant action by the WSPU hampered the suffrage campaign (e.g. militant action prevented further talk about the conciliation bill which the NUWSS had strived so hard for), and took it further away from its goal. By Omar Jamshad 10S ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    Prime Minister s residence at 10 Downing Street, they smashed many windows: they were both sent to prison for 2 months. The WSPU and the NUWSS were both trying to get Asquith on there side, in order to convince him to give women the right to vote.

  2. Describe the ways in which the method used by the Suffragists and the Suffragettes ...

    publicity and people started talking about weather to give women the vote or not. In ...... parliament was persuaded to give women the vote in all local elections. They were then later given the vote in the London county counsel elections, this though was not the groups main objective what

  1. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    She had sacrificed her life for the cause and this turned out to be very beneficial to the Suffragettes' cause. The type of leadership also played a part in why the two campaigns used different methods to get their point across.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    Nut by November the government had changed it's minds and replaced it with the Franchise Bill which failed to even mention women, when some MPs tried to introduce a women's suffrage amendment they were told it would change the nature of the bill and was therefore disallowed.

  1. What were the main differences between the suffragettes and the suffragists?

    The Suffragists announced that they would be campaigning for the Labour Party at the next General Election, as it was the only political party that was committed to women's suffrage. On the other hand the Suffragettes just made their campaign all the more violent.

  2. The Militant Suffragettes

    This is when the members of WSPU became known as suffragettes. In 1907 things were starting to change within the WSPU, The Pankhursts realised that there tactics were not working the various protests or unannounced speeches in political arenas were losing there impact.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work