• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Describe the ways in which the suffragists and suffragettes were different.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

George Cohen Describe the ways in which the suffragists and suffragettes were different. Essentially both the suffragists (National Union of Women's Suffrage Societies) and suffragettes (Women's Social and Political Union) were fighting for the same thing. The thing that makes them different was the methods they used to achieve their political common goal. This common goal was to achieve the right for women to vote, and to improve women's rights in general. Ultimately they wanted equal rights to men. Each method was effective in its own way, and together they achieved the vote for women aged over 30 in 1918. ...read more.

Middle

He then called an election, so the plan was abandoned. This infuriated the suffragettes, and this was a key turning point in their methods. They decided that much more radical measures need to be taken. The suffragists did not support their plan. They were gradually persuading people to come around to their ideas. They believed that the power of words was very effective and was working, although it was taking more time. By protesting and formulating quality speeches they were not only persuading people, but also showing that they had courage and intelligence, and that they were not controlled by their hearts and emotions. ...read more.

Conclusion

The suffragettes' methods became even more radical. They chained themselves to fences outside Buckingham Palace, and starved themselves in prison. They were starting to die for what they believed in. This gained the sympathy of the public. The methods were working well. Between the two groups they used a wide range of methods to reach the goal which was partially achieved in 1918, when women over 30 got the vote. Both methods were effective and, although they were extremely different, and even contradicted each other at some points, they were more effective together. Even Millicent Fawcett who, as the founder of the suffragists, was strongly against militancy, understood the frustration that caused people to be driven to it. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Describe The Ways In Which The Actions Of The Suffragists and Suffragettes Were Different

    She tried to grab the reins of the king s horse at the Epsom derby: she died 4 days after the incident due to head injuries, inflicted by the horses hoofs. This act showed how serious the suffragettes were about getting the vote.

  2. Describe the ways in which the methods of the Suffragists and Suffragettes were different.

    In 1907 Mrs Charlotte Despard and Mrs Theresa Billington-Grieg formed The Women's Freedom League (WFL), it was a breakaway group from the WSPU. One of the WFL's methods of getting the right to vote was to evade paying taxes to the Inland Revenue until they gained the right to vote, and in 1911 they refused to co-operate with the census.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work