• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Despite his reputation as the 'Tsar Liberator', Alexander II had failed to satisfy the growing mood for change in Russia by the time of his assassination in 1881" Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Despite his reputation as the 'Tsar Liberator', Alexander II had failed to satisfy the growing mood for change in Russia by the time of his assassination in 1881" Explain why you agree or disagree with this statement. Tsar Alexander II earned the unofficial title 'Tsar Liberator' from the Russian serfs when he introduced the Edict of Emancipation in 1861. This was an Edict that gave the serfs their freedom and enabled them to become free citizens. At the time of Tsar Alexander II coming to the throne, there was a great demand for change in Russia. Reformation was seen as essential to Russia's survival in the modern European world and Tsar Alexander II knew this. During his reign Alexander II reformed things such as the judicial system, the military and local governments but also, in some ways, contradicted his reform and introduced some reactionary measures which included reviving exile to Siberia and restricting zemstvos from communicating with each other. These reactionary methods may not have been too welcome in a society where there was a great demand for change. Tsar Alexander II reformed many important things that improved people's lives greatly, but there is still a lot of evidence that shows Alexander had failed to satisfy the people. ...read more.

Middle

In 1866 an assassination attempt was made on Alexander and another followed the following year. Both of these attempts had an impact on Alexander and he went through a period of reaction. "Alexander felt the need for more security...The Tsar began to retreat from public life....This reactionary force, coupled, as some saw it, with the lack of any major new reforms, led to a gradual growth in revolutionary activity." (Russia 1815 - 1881 by Russell Sherman) This quote shows the effects of assassination attempts on the Tsar (more security around the Tsar was not surprising) and it also shows that during this period of the Tsar being less prominent, the revolutionary force grew. This may have been because of a need for change and, as the quote states, there were no new major reforms to satisfy this need so this could have caused the revolutionary force to grow. Tsar Alexander II may have failed to satisfy the people because even though he introduced many major reforms, they had limited aims. For example, the Emancipation edict. From the serfs point of view it may have looked like The Tsar was introducing it for the well being of the people but in fact, it was introduced for quite selfish reasons. ...read more.

Conclusion

Tsar Alexander agreed to this proposal and signed it on the morning of his assassination. So because of the death of the Tsar this plan was later abolished. There is much evidence to agree with the statement of Alexander failing to satisfy the growing mood for change in Russia by the time of his assassination in 1881, but there is also a lot of evidence to disagree with the statement. One important point is that his assassination doesn't mean that the whole of the Russian population wanted him dead, it may have just been one group of people who had this thought. Tsar Alexander II's increasing popularity may have been the cause of his death. For example, if people such as Alexander Herzen had the belief that the Russian peasantry would start a revolution then Alexander becoming more popular would be the opposite of what they would want. The Tsars high popularity would mean that the people's demand for a revolution would decrease day by day. Alexander's assassination may have been because his opposition groups saw it as the only possible way of gaining their socialist society. On the whole the evidence seems to suggest that Alexander II satisfied the mood for change with all of the reformation that took place, even though some reaction also took place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Why did Alexander II Emancipate the Serfs in 1861?

    5 star(s)

    Russia's backward economic system was something Alexander knew he had to change, and this would need reform: "Russia was undeniably economically backward in comparison with every other great power"[9][9]. However, he wanted to modernise without losing his autonomous position, therefore knew he had to handle reforms like emancipation with care and balance.

  2. To what extent did the emancipation of the serfs in Russiain 1861 improve the ...

    On one hand there is a lot of evidence showing that the serfs lives improved significantly. The peasants would be considered free citizens. They would be free to marry who ever they chose to, own their own property, take legal action, engage in trade or business and, maybe most importantly, could no longer be bought or sold.

  1. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    This is undeniable proof that Tsarism was out of date. There was an extreme lack of co-operation between these two organizations to the point that people had to walk almost eight miles from the military hospital to the Red Cross to stock up with medical supplies.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Khrushchev also says that 'everywhere he saw enemies, 'double dealers' and spies'. This is probably a reference to the show trials of the high ranking party members - in 1934, there were one thousand, nine hundred and sixty-six delegates at the party congress, by 1936 only eight hundred and fifty eight remained.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    Other agreements of two sources include the idea of Stalin being the judge however the extent of this differs in the source J where Stalin is not only the judge but everything including their lawyers. Source J doesn't portray any defendants nor does it portray the destiny of the defendants

  2. Stalin Man or Monster

    Source M focuses on Stalin's personality and not his actions, it explains that Stalin was corrupted by power and wouldn't not have been an evil man had he not had that power. Using his power as a dictator Stalin was corrupted by power in a lot of cases, an example of one would be the purges.

  1. Reform followed by Reaction is a dangerous strategy for any government to follow and ...

    The people were outraged so in June 1907 there was a second Duma created. Nicholas didn't like that one either so he dissolved it. Finally, later in 1907, there was a third Duma but it was a joke and an illusion to democracy in Russia.

  2. Which of the following views best explain the fall of Tsarism of Russia?

    Disorganization meant that resources could not be delivered to where it was needed in time. Although this was due to the neglect of the home front, it showed that the war was putting great pressures on the government and to Russia causing impossible conditions of everyday life.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work