• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did all of Lord Kitchener's Volunteer army march to war with Zest and Idealism in the first place?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

G.C.S.E Coursework Daniel Cole 6) The historian A.J.P. Taylor wrote, "On the Somme ... perished ...the zest and idealism with which nearly three million English men had marched forth to war." However, did all of Lord Kitchener's Volunteer army march to war with Zest and Idealism in the first place? In 1914, men "flocked to the colours". Many wanted to impress sweethearts or wives, hundreds wanted to have a "crack at the Kaiser" and "fight back the Hun" like the crusaders centuries before them. Others wanted to fight for and protect their King and country and some wanted to save the British Empire, in which they fully believed. But still there were those men who had been pressurised and even forced to fight. In Trafalgar Square, and outside cinemas and theatres women handed out white feathers to men, not in uniform and at home, there was often a lot of pressure from children parents and even spouses to fight. These men didn't go to war with zest and idealism. Source A is made up mostly of opinion; "there are those who see the Somme...as an event so terrible that it killed the breezy, crusading spirit of 1914-15." ...read more.

Middle

Source F shows the British losses on the first day of the Battle, 1st July 1916. It states that 57,970 men were lost on that day and we usually round that figure up to 60000. These are official British Army figures and therefore, we have no reason to question them. With such a grotesque number of casualties, how could zest and idealism still exist in the British lines? Lloyd George is the author of source G. At the time, George was the minister for munitions at the Somme. When he wrote the source, he was fighting for appeasement, and pacifism. His memories of which, source G is an extract, could easily be coloured with hindsight. Lloyd George could feel responsible for the huge number of casualties because his shells, of which many were duds, may have helped contribute to the first day's failure. In this self-blame, he could have a motive to deflect blame onto Haig and/or Rawlingson. He says, "We failed to achieve our objective of a breakthrough." This is his way of blaming those in command. This quote is fact. With this on their minds how could the average British soldier; keep hold of his zest and idealism? ...read more.

Conclusion

"When the Battle of the Somme began the Entente had a tremendous superiority, both on land and in the air. The Entente troops had worked their way further and further into the German lines. We had heavy losses in men and material. As a result of the Somme fighting we were completely exhausted on the Western Front. If the war lasted, our defeat seemed inevitable." If this extract is true, why on earth would the British army loose its zest and idealism? The weight of evidence in these sources shows that the British zest and idealism did perish on the Somme. However, to make a more valid decision, I would have liked: a key British eyewitness, newspapers from the time, the original battle plans, and photographs. Also, source F is one-sided and therefore I would also want the German casualty figures. With these sources, I could make a more valid judgement. However I still agree with Taylor's statement because, only seven and a half miles was gained at the deepest point in the line with huge casualties. The British only managed to push the Germans into a more defendable position in the Hindenburg Line, and the bombardment on which so much rested, was a failure. A lot of effort and minimal achievement. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. WHO WAS TO BLAME FOR THE ENGLISH CIVIL WAR?

    It is important to realise that nobody wanted a civil war when Parliament first met. Parliament wanted to be more important, Charles wanted to keep as much power as he could and also defend the Church of England against puritans, and puritans wanted the Church of England to change and

  2. World war 1

    This again proves that Source F can be trusted and contains useful information; Haig used 'an appalling strategy' which got thousands killed. Source H praises Haig and calls him 'one of the main architects of the Allied victory'. The general who has written this says, 'Haig's armies, which had complete

  1. To what extent was appeasement justified?

    The rest of the babies representing the various countries in Europe are being lined up on the bed, depicted with worried faces. The fact that the babies are lined up on the line makes it seem as if they are powerless, as if they had no sort of authority over

  2. How important was Haig's role in the successes and failures of the British Army ...

    This demonstrates that the soldiers had absolute faith in Haig and saw him as a hero. Another aspect where Haig was heavily criticized for was the fact that he never visited the front line himself. The general thought that the public had was that a general had to visit the front line to check how well things were going.

  1. Did The First World War Liberate British Women?

    Source D4 shows that employment figures in certain industries for women rose during the War then dropped soon after it had ended. A historian would find this source very useful because of its content and its accuracy. However it lacks reliability because it is not attributed.

  2. Why did the General Strike of 1926 take place?

    The Conservative government now had reason to believe that the unions were not only a threat to the Constitution, but were also working to bring socialism to Britain through syndicalism. When, on 30th June 1925, the mine owners gave a month's notice that there would be a further wage cut

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work