• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Hitler succeed in creating a Volksgemeinschaft?

Extracts from this document...


To what extend do you consider that Hitler and the Nazis had achieved their aim of social revolution and unity (Volksgemeinschaft) by 1939? Hitler had a vision- he wanted to use his power to create Volksgemeinschaft, what he called the 'all pure' German nation. Hitler interpreted the social revolution as an uncontaminated 'Aryan' nation working together for the benefit of the German people and ultimately achieving total national economic self-sufficiency; otherwise known as autarky. Hitler and the Nazis knew that they would have to radically change the system of the country under previous leadership of the Weimar Republic- extinguishing "outsiders" and establishing one social class. However, not all of these ideals were "new" to the country, their philosophy regarding some respects to Volksgemeinschaft were not revolutionary. Nazism was a society of the extreme right, and revolutions are normally associated with left-wing political parties. Debates have been raised on this matter; Pro-Nazi revolution historian David Schoenbaum has argued that "Nazism was a powerful and original force in German culture". He acknowledged that the Third Reich perceived many of the conventional changes one links with an embryonic industrial society, also claiming that "the Nazis effectively anticipated an image of a society without the associated class differences". The Nazi citizens quoted about themselves, "United like no other in recent German history, a society of opportunities for young and old." Nazism was a close culture, but in saying this we are also admitting that getting rid of the "impure bloods", or Gemeinschaftsunfahig, to create complete Volksgemeinschaft was wrong and takes away morality from the 'close' people. Another Nazi historian, Hiden, agrees with this view- "The persecution of hundreds of thousands of Germans by the Hitler regime serves to illustrate that the dissent and nonconformity must have been widespread." This statement goes as far in saying that civil unrest did arise in Nazi Germany, therefore a successful social revolution had not been fully accomplished. Starting a social revolution involves creating a new way of life for the people. ...read more.


Hitler introduced Lebensborns which were buildings where women could go to become pregnant by a "racially pure" SS man. The government openly publicised them and the Nazis were prepared to go to these lengths in order to create the Aryan race. Also, because breeding a stock of Aryan people was essential in the eyes of the Fuhrer, legal divorces were made much easier to obtain. A marriage which was not producing children for the national community was seen as 'worthless'. This helped Hitler to create the personnel for his Volksgemeinschaft. To combat against women working, the Nazis issued restriction on women's employment in the Civil Service- in October 1933, the official guidelines for recruiting stated, "In the event of males and females being equally qualified for employment in public service, the male applicant should be given preference." This shows Hitler trying to achieve his aims, therefore partially achieving social revolution as women remained at home. Overall, the Nazi policies towards women suffered from several contradictions. Family life was promoted as an Aryan family would provide the base for Hitler's Volksgemeinschaft and propaganda was used to encourage this. However, several of the Nazi policies undermined the family and its ways of life. The demands of the Hitler Youth took women away from the family and the quest for the genetically pure race led to the encouragement of divorce. Also, the Lebensborn programmes encouraged promiscuity as in a way they were 'state-run brothels'. Another contradiction occurred when dealing with the Nazis attempt to drive women back into the home. The number of women in all employment areas increased, mainly due to the economic recovery. By 1936, the economy was suffering from a labour shortage in key areas and, by 1939, this had become acute. In 1943 Hitler had to reside to the fact that women had to register to work in order for the country to carry on functioning due to the war. ...read more.


The racial policies were very much enforced, with Jews, Blacks and Gypsies all being sent to concentration camps. Similarly, the same went for those who did not support the party. Additionally, the euthanasia projects of the late 1930s 'assisted' those who were not able-bodied, leaving the country 'pure'. Changes like this to society point directly to a social revolution. Support for the party and leader increased with the introduction of the Nazi education system and the Hitler Youth. This group promoted the Nazi ways and discipline style to younger generations, and family values were promoted throughout Germany- another change to social life and behaviour. However there are areas which suggest that Hitler was not successful in his mission for Volksgemeinschaft. First and foremost, Hitler needed the elites- big businesses, landowners, Junkers the Church and the army. Without these elements supporting the Party, Hitler would lose massive amounts of influence and control, and the fact that they still existed goes against the proposed classless society. Another point of Volksgemeinschaft was that Hitler would have complete control over the State, which he did not have. Due to Hitler's need to pursue foreign policy targets, this scheme was a failure. The war effort and attempts to obtain autarky led to many changes to an already disturbed society. Also, it would be impossible for Hitler to exterminate everybody that did not match his Volksgemeinschaft criteria, as they were imperative to the war effort. In contrast to the nationalistic point of Aryan workers was the fact that foreign workers were readily used on farms all the able men were conscripted to the army. This contradicts the traditional way of life Hitler had promised for Volksgemeinschaft. Also, due to the preparation for the war, women were needed in the factories- once again opposing the traditional lifestyle Hitler wanted for women. As Ian Kershaw explains, the Nazi regime was "a physiological 'revolution' rather than one of substance". Minds had to be won over before a 'full' social revolution could take place. ?? ?? ?? ?? ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Did The Nazis Succeed in Controlling the Hearts and Minds of German Youth?

    Hartland, the banker? Are you Jewish? 'Yes' 'what a pity. I had hoped for an entirely Aryan class'" as well as in textbook questions. A typical question would be "The Jews are aliens in Germany. In 1933 there were 66,060,000 inhabitants of the German Reich of whom 499,862 were Jews.

  2. How did Hitler and the Nazis change the German economy and the lives of ...

    The following years would prove his devotion to this decision: In 1936, military spending in Germany exceeded 10% of GNP, higher than any other European country at the time. Military investment also exceeded civilian investment from 1936 onwards. Although Hitler is credited with beginning the re-armament of Germany, Hermann M´┐Żller,

  1. What was it like to live in Nazi Germany? How did life change for ...

    These groups, which took place during out of school times, attracted many young people as it was a chance to go away without their family and learn new skills and to meet new people. Many parents liked the idea too.

  2. Did Hitler succeed in winning the hearts and minds of Youths

    On these grounds it is viable to say that Hitler did not win, or control the minds of older members of the German Youth because if he did a clear growth in child rate would be seen.

  1. Between 1933 and 1945 Hitler and the Nazi Part were successful in their creation ...

    It may have seem that Hitler had created an environment with no, or little opposition, but this may have been caused by the facts that the majority of the opposition being scattered around the country, and the nature of the regime made it hard and dangerous for them to unite and co-ordinate.

  2. Free essay

    Did the Nazis Succeed in controlling the Churches?

    on the other the Catholic Church might have seen the arrest of one of its cardinals as a threat. There were also other campaigners besides Galen that suffered much worse at the hands of the Nazis, such as Paul Schneider, who preached anti-Nazi sermons.

  1. To what extent did the Nazis achieve an economic miracle in Germany between 1933-1939?

    Firstly, there was the policy of autarky (self-sufficiency). This envisaged the creation of trading or economic community under the dominating influence of Germany, which could be developed to rival the other great economic powers. Secondly, attention was given to the emerging idea of deficit financing, which found its most obvious expression in the theories of the British economist, John Maynard Keynes.

  2. Explain how Hitler and the Nazi Party exerted total control over the lives of ...

    The same happened with Films9. Propaganda was vital in Hitler's control of the German society. Youth Today, Soldiers Tomorrow Hitler gained control of the impressible youth through the education system and the Hitler Youth10. Ex-member Edward Behrendt of the Hitler Youth once stated, "If you can capture the minds of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work