• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did Serbia benefit from the Balkan Wars?

Extracts from this document...


DID SERBIA BENEFIT FROM THE BALKAN WARS? The 20th century arrived with momentous events in the making or on the horizon. The Balkan peoples were in stages of uneven development. Those that had a state, such as the Serbs, were a powerful magnet for their brothers who were living under foreign rule, much to the discomfort of Austria-Hungary, which had a large Slav population within its borders. Those that did not have a state, such as the Albanians, were still attempting to begin the process of nation building. Ten years of almost continuous war began with the onset of the Balkan Wars in October 1912 and lasted - at least for Serbia - through World War I and to the resolution of the status of Albania in May 1922. This decade was decisive both in shaping the modern Serbian state and in forming Serb national consciousness. And as a result of the "first serious fighting in Europe since the fall of Plevna in 1877"1, the Balkan Wars impact was significant in shaping the eventual outcome of the Balkans after the First World War. Since March of 1912, Bulgaria and Serbia had conducted secret negotiations under the guidance of the Russian Tsar to formulate a military alliance to rid the Balkans of the last vestiges of Turkish domain: Thrace, Macedonia, and the four vilayets of Albania. Turkey's military engagement with Italy over Tripoli, along with its difficulty in suppressing the Albanian and Arab revolts within the Empire, and as J Lampe puts it 'Ottoman vulnerability'2, signalled to these two rivals that circumstances proved ripe to expand their kingdoms once the Turks were fought and banished. ...read more.


Later in the month, representatives of the belligerents and the major European powers met in London to decide the Balkan question. "The Balkan Wars should have finished at the London Conference in January 1913. But the humiliation of the Turkish army re-ignited the bitter domestic struggle in Istanbul between the Liberals and the CUP."3 The Turks rejected the peace conditions demanded by the Balkan states, the chief sticking point being Adrianople, and the conference ended in failure on January 6, 1913. On January 23, a successful coup d'�tat brought an extreme nationalist grouping called the 'Young Turks' to power in the Ottoman Empire, and within a week fighting resumed. Again the allies were victorious: Io�nnina fell to the Greeks and Adrianople to the Bulgarians. Under a peace treaty signed in London on May 30, 1913, the Ottoman Empire lost almost all of its remaining European territory, including all of Macedonia and Albania. Albanian independence was insisted upon by the European powers, and Macedonia was to be divided among the Balkan allies. After the conclusion of hostilities Serbia showed intentions of annexing a large part of Albania, in order to gain an outlet on the Adriatic, but this step toward a "Greater Serbia" was opposed by Austria-Hungary and Italy and by the Albanians, who had proclaimed their independence. Dissatisfied with these terms, Serbia demanded of Bulgaria a greater share of Macedonia. However, Bulgaria refused to recognize the Serbian claim to certain Bulgarian-held portions of Macedonia. On June 1, 1913, Greece and Serbia concluded an alliance aimed against Bulgaria. ...read more.


The Balkan Wars profoundly influenced the subsequent course of European history. By creating a strong and ambitious Serbia, the peace settlements engendered fear and anti-Serbian sentiment in neighbouring Austria-Hungary. The dismantling of the Ottoman Empire and Bulgaria created equally dangerous tensions in south-eastern Europe. These conditions greatly intensified the contemporary forces in shaping a general European conflict. The Balkan Wars prepared the way for World War I by satisfying some of the aspirations of Serbia and thereby giving a great impetus to the Serbian desire to annex parts of Austria-Hungary; by alarming Austria and stiffening Austrian resolution to crush Serbia; and by giving causes of dissatisfaction to Bulgaria and Turkey. "In Serbia and Montenegro the result of the two successive Balkan Wars, though these had exhausted the material resources of the two countries, was a justifiable return of national self-confidence and rejoicing such as the people, humiliated and impoverished as it had habitually been by its internal and external troubles, had not known for very many years. At last Serbia and Montenegro had joined hands. At last Old Serbia was restored to the free kingdom."8 Therefore, the result was the impetus desired by Serbia for so long to finally try to fulfil her long term aim - that of unification of South Slavs one way or another. She had gained very crucial territories including Kosovo, and other states such as Bosnia - Herzegovina and other ethnic groups such ass the Croats and the Slovenes took great pleasure in watching the old Empires of The Habsburgs and the Ottomans fall to pieces. It stimulated further ethic nationalism and created such a vibe for Pan-Slavism and unification, that could not be quelled again by any Great Power. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    This is proven in the Bosnian Crisis in 1908 and then the second Moroccan Crisis in 1911. There Germany again had to back down, keeling under the combined pressure of not only Britain and France but also Russia whom, after the Bosnian Crisis, was bitter toward Germany.


    After hearing about the defeat of Piedmont at Custoza, most men deserted him again but he still fought and had some minor successes but still no one wanted to employ them. He soon became a royalist because he believed that only Charles Albert could defeat the Austrians and therefore achieve unity.

  1. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    They were in the fear of being attacked. So the alliance was the seeking for security, not war. - Fear of the Englishmen about a new balance of power in Europe had compel them into making a new mind of finding allies.

  2. Historical significance of two world wars

    Besides from losing its territories including overseas colonies and resources, she was required to disarm in army, navy and air force and turning Rhineland into a demilitarization zone. Germany also had to pay a huge sum of reparations of 6.6 billion pounds in successive installments over 30 yeas.

  1. '"The FirstWorld War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan crisis in the ...

    The naval race was originally supposed to act as a deterrent of war between Britain and Germany. It was clear that this event of the naval race prevented England and Germany joining the alliance, as there was so much rivalry between the two countries on this matter.

  2. "The FirstWorld War was the result of a Badly Mismanaged Balkan Crisis In The ...

    The rivalry began after 1878 when Serbia was formed. At the time Austria wanted an influence in the Balkans to expand its empire. It failed many times. This also increased its desire to unite fellow Slavs something, which Russia had also longed to do for a long time. Serbia wanted to extend its power in the Balkans and south-

  1. The Congress of Vienna

    - All these encouraged the nationalistic movements. - The ideas had led to revolutions in 1830, 1848 and the unification of Italy and Germany. Background - During the American and French Revolution, people believed people were the basis of the society. - People respected the leader only because they were the representatives of the state.

  2. "The First World War was the result of a badly mismanaged Balkan Crisis in ...

    Austria-Hungary was the only power for whom the Balkan Question was a matter of survival. Russia needed a warm water port to enable her to trade all year round and needed access to the Mediterranean, the straits. Russia was concerned for her security, as, during the Crimean war she had

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work