• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the benefits of Stalin's economic policies justify their implementation?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did the benefits of Stalin's economic policies justify their implementation? In 1928, Russia was poor and her industry was smaller than many countries. Stalin aimed to transform this and turn Russia into a powerful and strong nation. He wanted to create a modern industry so Russia was less dependent on the western world and could catch up with America. He also wanted to protect Russia so the were military strong in case of war and they had a strong industry capable of producing good armaments so they had defence in case of attack. Stalin aimed to re-organise agriculture to produce food so Russia could trade with Europe and America so they could get money to buy raw materials and machinery. He wanted to feed Russia's population. Stalin also aimed for Russia to become self-sufficient. ...read more.

Middle

Some industries were over-producing and others under-producing so many factories ran short of materials. Un-skilled workers and ex-peasants made mistakes, but these mistakes weren't admitted but blamed on 'wreckers' and 'saboteurs'. Oil production failed to meet targets and led to fuel crisis. The lack of skilled workers created instability because they were constantly changing jobs. The effects on the people as a result of the 'Five-Year Plans' were very bad. In the building of the Magnitogorsk, working conditions was dangerous. The workers got little food, and the bubonic plague was common. Vermin and bed bugs were at risk also. Sanitary conditions and heat was intolerable. It was a bad organisation of labour. Workers were paid minimum wages and food was rationed but it improved by the mid-1930s. There were millions of peasants so housing became impossible. ...read more.

Conclusion

Generally, agricultural production rose. However, collectivisation had its disadvantages. If peasants refused to join the collective, they were shot by activists or sent to Gulag. This caused violence to erupt and riots occurred. There were severe food shortages although food was being exported from Russia to other countries. A lot of disruption was caused to agriculture and there was disastrous harvest. The result of this was famine, which the state never admitted existed. Stalin began to demand gangs to take the small amount of grain, which was kept in stores or left to rot whilst people starved to death. Russia eventually did become an industrially modernised nation. Although there was terrible famine and kulaks (rich peasants) suffered, most people benefited. Large complexes were made, there were good facilities and agriculture had improved. Russia became self-sufficient and independent. Te human costs were high as many people died because of the famine and living conditions. But Hitler became a threat and Russia didn't have enough protection in case of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    The USSR's industry was a competitor of that of the USA. A factor that did help this, though, was that while these plans were being carried out the USA was experiencing the Wall Street Crash. This made the USA's industry suffer a lot and had their share of world manufacturing

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    quality of lives and deaths of millions of people that happened in order to modernise and industrialise Russia. In terms of benefiting the people of Russia in the short term, the Five Year Plans were not very successful at all.

  1. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    As well as free education was free medical care. As well as this, campaigns were carried out against such things as typhus, cholera and malaria. During this time the number of doctors and nurses skyrocketed as much as the facilities would allow. The death rate went down, as well as infant mortality rates, for the first time ever.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Source I is an example of the control Stalin had over the Soviet people. He created a cult of personality which masked the truth and showed Stalin as a God-like figure. Though both sources are biased, they give an accurate view of the Show Trials.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    under Stalin as they transformed her backward and disorganised state to a modern and competitive one which it needed to be if it was to compete with the industrialised capitalist Western countries or defend herself from their dreaded attacks such as that of Germany's in 1941 and protect the communism

  2. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    Stalin's second five-year plan had an extra aim to the ones set in the first which was to create or import machine parts and other investment goods (such as tractors, lorries and cargo ships). Another distinguishing feature of this five-year plan was the distribution of medals to hardworking men as an incentive to others.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    In the third Five Year Plan many factories were switched to the production of consumer goods but the plan only ran for three and a half years because of the USSR's participation of the Second World War. This meant that factories had to work to a very demanding supply of

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Without the Bolshevik Party, without the leadership of Lenin and Trotsky, the Russian workers would never have taken power in 1917, despite all their heroism. The revolutionary party cannot be improvised on the spur of the moment, any more than a general staff can be improvised on the outbreak of war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work