• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the benefits of Stalin's economic policies justify their implementation?

Extracts from this document...


Did the benefits of Stalin's economic policies justify their implementation? In 1928, Russia was poor and her industry was smaller than many countries. Stalin aimed to transform this and turn Russia into a powerful and strong nation. He wanted to create a modern industry so Russia was less dependent on the western world and could catch up with America. He also wanted to protect Russia so the were military strong in case of war and they had a strong industry capable of producing good armaments so they had defence in case of attack. Stalin aimed to re-organise agriculture to produce food so Russia could trade with Europe and America so they could get money to buy raw materials and machinery. He wanted to feed Russia's population. Stalin also aimed for Russia to become self-sufficient. ...read more.


Some industries were over-producing and others under-producing so many factories ran short of materials. Un-skilled workers and ex-peasants made mistakes, but these mistakes weren't admitted but blamed on 'wreckers' and 'saboteurs'. Oil production failed to meet targets and led to fuel crisis. The lack of skilled workers created instability because they were constantly changing jobs. The effects on the people as a result of the 'Five-Year Plans' were very bad. In the building of the Magnitogorsk, working conditions was dangerous. The workers got little food, and the bubonic plague was common. Vermin and bed bugs were at risk also. Sanitary conditions and heat was intolerable. It was a bad organisation of labour. Workers were paid minimum wages and food was rationed but it improved by the mid-1930s. There were millions of peasants so housing became impossible. ...read more.


Generally, agricultural production rose. However, collectivisation had its disadvantages. If peasants refused to join the collective, they were shot by activists or sent to Gulag. This caused violence to erupt and riots occurred. There were severe food shortages although food was being exported from Russia to other countries. A lot of disruption was caused to agriculture and there was disastrous harvest. The result of this was famine, which the state never admitted existed. Stalin began to demand gangs to take the small amount of grain, which was kept in stores or left to rot whilst people starved to death. Russia eventually did become an industrially modernised nation. Although there was terrible famine and kulaks (rich peasants) suffered, most people benefited. Large complexes were made, there were good facilities and agriculture had improved. Russia became self-sufficient and independent. Te human costs were high as many people died because of the famine and living conditions. But Hitler became a threat and Russia didn't have enough protection in case of war. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    The new hydroelectric power station in the background illustrates the success of his plan to industrialise the USSR. Lenin's New Economic Policy encouraged agriculture but Stalin believed it was important for the USSR to industrialise. He argued the USSR should come first and communists should concentrate o building up its economy.

  2. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    In reality, because of this almost none of their targets were reached. Collectivisation could be considered as a considerable political success, because it achieved its aims of introducing communist ideas into Russian agriculture. Collectivisation was much more communist orientated than the Five Year Plans - the ways Russia was being improved brought it closer to a communist society.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    Many leading figures like Kamenev, Bukharin and Zinoviev were put on trial because they were traitors of the nation and additionally other non leading figures were put on trial like 500,00 party members on charges of anti Soviet activities and were either executed or sent to labour camps.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    Lenin was ruler, worked very hard to get ahead, and had money and grain to spare. Stalin wanted these people to give up everything that they had worked hard to get, and join the collective farms. Many Kulaks, in an act of resistance, burned their farms down, along with their crops, and killed their livestock.

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    These medals were called Strakhanov medals after a miner called Alexei Strakhanov who produced 14 times more coal than was normal in one shift (he mined 102 tons of coal). After this a 'Strakhanovite movement' was set up and Alexei proceeded to tour the country lecturing on his ideals and methods.

  2. Did The Benefits of Stalin's Economic Policies Justify Their Implementation?

    When the Five-Year Plans were introduced by Stalin, many workers were optimistic about the future of Russia, and this gave many the inspiration to work hard for their country. People truly believed that the harder they worked, the better the life they or their children would be able to lead later on.

  1. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Subsequently, entire cities were built from nothing and workers were taken out into the new industrial centres. New dams and hydroelectric power supplied industry's energy needs. The second of the Five Year Plans constructed on the achievements of the first Five Year Plan.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    in the soviets, the only really representative organs of society, and take power? Only because the bourgeois Provisional Government had revealed its complete bankruptcy. Only because it had failed to carry out a single one of the tasks of the bourgeois-democratic revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work