• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did The Benefits of Stalin's Economic Policies Justify Their Implementation?

Extracts from this document...


Did The Benefits of Stalin's Economic Policies Justify Their Implementation? To industrialise Russia as quickly as possible, Stalin began a series of the Five-Year Plans. The plans consisted of setting production targets for each industry. Very high targets were set for the production of heavy industry. Stalin also introduced collectivisation, a scheme that involved joining individual plots of land into large farms. Stalin introduced The Five-Year Plans and Collectivisation to help transform Russia into a strong, powerful nation and leave behind the struggling backward country it had been for so many years. Stalin knew that for Russia to become a leading Nation, it would have to be as up to date as the countries in the Western World, and not have to rely on these countries for industrial goods. Stalin strongly believed the West wanted to crush Russia, so it was also essential that the industry improved, so that armaments could be made and the country could defend itself against attack. The apparent results achieved by the five-year plans were extremely high, production statistics had trebled for electricity and coal and iron outputs had hugely increased. ...read more.


By the time the third Five-Year plan had been prematurely ended due to the Second World War, Russia was the second largest economy and held enough defence to withstand Nazi attack. Although collectivisation was not a complete success when it was first introduced, by 1940 agricultural production was the highest it had ever been, and this gave Stalin the proof that it was a success. Collectivisation was perfect way for the State to gain complete control over the peasants and the agricultural production. The peasants were being asked to grow the crops for the Russian industry instead of for themselves, this was effectively making The USSR a socialist state, encouraging the people to adopt the views of sharing and co-operating and make Russia a better country. When collectivisation started many peasants did not need to work on the farms anymore, and so they would be free to work for heavy industry instead, so they were not left unemployed. Despite the amazing results the Five-Year Plans produced, there were many hidden flaws to the plans, which had terrible effects on the workers. ...read more.


Collectivisation was very unpopular among the peasants, who were not willing to hand their animals and tools to the State. Many carried on resisting against the State, and those not willing to co-operate were labelled "kulaks" and were either arrested and sent to labour camps or they were shot. This was known as "dekulakisation" and was used to scare the peasants into doing as the State told them. Because of the disruption to farming and peasants not being familiar to the new method of work, there was a shortage of food and many became hungry. Things became worse when there was a harvest failure, but the state continued to demand the food and millions of peasants died of starvation, while watching their crops being exported by the State officials. For Stalin, The Five-Year Plans and collectivisation were a success; industry and agriculture had improved and Russia had finally caught up with The Western World. However, the new policies cost the lives of millions and I believe that the cost of so many human lives can not be compensated by the improvement to the industry in The USSR. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Stalin and the Five Year Plans

    However, all this was not without an opposite downside. Because of collectivisation, all the farmers had to share their land with each other, all industry was controlled by the government, not the people, many areas of industry were completely neglected, many small workshops were squeezed out and forgotten about, many

  2. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    In essence, collectivisation succeeded in its main purpose, to provide the resources for industrialisation. The government did not have to pay out as much money as it had to do previously, this is because instead of paying the workers on the kolkhoz (term given to one type of collective farm)

  1. How successful were Stalins Economic Policies?

    they had prematurely met all their targets and could move onto the next one. He did this because he wanted to prove to the people of Russia and other countries that Communism was better than Capitalism and could achieve beyond anyone's expectations, as they were ahead of schedule.

  2. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Still, from a different viewpoint, Stalin's glorification idea can be considered a side effect of the Five Year Plans to some extent. This is evident as he also embarked on his scheme because he was uncertain whether communism will survive considering USSR was geographically surrounded by powers which were dead against it.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    This process was known as Dekulakisation. The typical kulak family opened two or three horses and several cows, and had a larger than average farm but they also had other peasants that were hired by them to work for them in the harvest season. Stalin thought that the most likely people to oppose the collectivisation scheme was the kulaks because they had very much to lose.

  2. Evaluation on the Effect of Stalin's Economic and Social Policies

    grow it and where to grow it, they also were going to take large amounts of harvest from them for very little pay. No one was more furious about this new policy, than the Kulaks. The Kulaks were a group of people, who when given land of their own when

  1. How successful were Stalin's economic policies in the 1920s and 30s?

    Stalin's second five-year plan had an extra aim to the ones set in the first which was to create or import machine parts and other investment goods (such as tractors, lorries and cargo ships). Another distinguishing feature of this five-year plan was the distribution of medals to hardworking men as an incentive to others.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    Stalin also wanted to catch up with the West in the standard of living conditions of the USSR people. Industrialisation created wealth for a society where people would have a good life and people in other parts of the world would welcome the working conditions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work