• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did The German People Benefit From The Weimar Government Between 1924 And 1929?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Did The German People Benefit From The Weimar Government Between 1924 And 1929? After Allied forces had defeated the Imperial rule in Germany, a chance emerged for Germany to 'repair' their country, by forming a stable democracy. This chance to start afresh was taken, and a German National Assembly met in the town of Weimar, due to the instability of other major towns. In the town of Weimar, this national assembly formed the Weimar Constitution - a constitution that would serve 62,000,000 Germans (according to a 1925 census) - so how did the democratic system of Government benefit the public? Essentially the constitution came in two parts, dealing with both the: - Structure & Tasks Of The Federation - Fundamental Duties & Rights Of The Germans The first part (structure) is less concerned with welfare for Germans, and whilst this part is crucial in the mechanics of the system of Government, it is not directly relevant to the German public. The most important statement in the Structure section is article 1: "The German federation is a republic. Supreme power emanates from the people" The second part (fundamental duties & rights) is more useful in showing the potential benefits for the public, as a result of the change to the democratic system of government. It is important to recognise that whilst many of these articles of the constitution sound good, they may not always have been successfully applied. ...read more.

Middle

The German government ordered passive resistance from the workers of the Ruhr, which was one of the major economic profit-spinners of Germany. The government agreed to pay the wages of the workers for the passive disobedience, and finding that they could neither pay these, nor the repayments began deficit financing. This caused hyperinflation - and money became simply worthless. The middle and upper classes were dreadfully affected, as their hard earned money suddenly became worthless. People were being paid - but having to take their wheelbarrow to collect all of the money, such was the scale of the inflation. The only thing that really retained its wealth was property. The deficit financing, intentional or not (to appear unable to pay repayments and thus have them lowered) not only crippled the nations economy - but crippled the German public also - by all accounts, for the public it was not a smart move. The German public also suffered a depression - which was in total fairness to the German government, a worldwide one as a result of the Wall Street crash in 1929 - 6 years after hyperinflation. Even through this depression the Germans only recognised the good parts of their economy - and believed thus that Germany had a strong and thriving economy. They were wrong however - Germany had been in economic trouble since the end of the First World War - and probably before. ...read more.

Conclusion

The instability of the system of Government was not good either. As covered in a previous essay - there were too many parties, catering for too many different interests, which was not really beneficial for the public. Whilst presumably the range of parties would give greater choice and greater diversity for the people in political parties, it actually proved instrumental in the fact that Germany simply couldn't produce a strong party, neither a strong government, or coalition! Whilst choice is often good, it wasn't here, and the constant switching of policies and parties would not just have been confusing, but also detrimental to the country, with fundamental elements being shaken up and turned around consistently. Germany had been left in a state by the Imperial government. The new democracy was not left with not much to work with - a lot needed doing to get the state in a respectable shape. Germany had been torn apart by war, and the steps that the government tried to take through stability measures, and attempting to turn the country into a more respectable nation in the process. They did achieve stunted success, and the public did seem to see an improvement. It was a tough time for a new government - but the public seemed to enjoy a more stable lifestyle, with better foreign relations and better attitudes being shown towards Germany - at least until 1933, and the rise of the Nazis. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How stable was Weimar Germany Between 1924 & 1929?

    His policy of fulfilment was successful. It was constructive diplomacy, whereby there was no antagonistic behaviour and where diplomacy was followed through negotiation and compromise. Stresemann fulfilled the terms of the treaty instead of rebelling against them as Germany had done previously as shown by the invasion of the Ruhr in 1923).

  2. To what extent were the problems of 1919-1923 overcome by the Weimar Government by ...

    Putsch took place during the depression as they believed hatred for the government would inspire a desire for revolution among the people. In 1924, the Weimar Government called off the passive resistance in the Ruhr, and thus restarted production. The introduction of the Dawes Plan in 1924 changed the currency

  1. Indeed, the perception that the rise of the NSDAP is accountable to the "failure" ...

    As a result, due to the massive expenditure to meet the post-war societal demands, the delivery of the promise of an effective welfare system became a means of discrimination and control. Therefore, it not only failed the expectations of the German people but also exacerbated the inflation through its expenditure.

  2. "By the beginning of 1929, the prospects for the survival of the WeimarRepublic looked ...

    If the short-term credits are called in, a large section of our economy would collapse...."2 This is highlighted in that Germany's share of world production had declined heavily from 14.3% in 1913 to 11.6% in 1926-29. As it is, wages just about kept pace with the cost of living but

  1. To what extent can the years 1924 – 1929 be described as “Golden” ones ...

    Britain and France did not want to see Germany driven into the arms of the Soviet Union. Luckily the two Western European powers did what Stresemann had hoped and this lead to a series of international agreements from which Germany benefited substantially; * In 1924 French troops withdrew from the

  2. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    KD Bracher "Hitler's deputy, Rosenberg, had proved to be a hesitant theoretician, unequal to the practical demands of political life." The party faced severe problems if it was to become a major political force. For one thing, its membership had drastically reduced during Hitler's time in prison.

  1. A Period of Relative Stability - The Dawes Plan and the Creation of Economic ...

    the Ruhr locked out 260,000 workers in a protest against compulsory arbitration in wage disputes. This highlighted the vast gap between workers and employers in Germany, and consequently many workers joined the KPD or the SPD, while industry gave increased support to the DNVP, questioning the levels of support for democracy in Weimar.

  2. Nazism and the New Age.

    NAers offering the same package to naive Christians, for the same purpose.] Hitler's vision of returning to "pure" pagan religion was echoed, or more accurately anticipated, by psychoanalyst Carl Jung in 1923: "We [Germans] need new foundations. We must dig down to the primitive in us, for only out of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work