• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the PLO's Peaceful Methods Achieve More or Less Than Terrorism

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q2-Did the PLO's Peaceful Methods Achieve More or Less Than Terrorism Since the 1960's the Arafat led PLO had gained worldwide publicity and acknowledgement for its cause of destruction against Israel. This was achieved through various peaceful methods but maybe more famous or infamous for its terrorist activities such as the Munich Olympics killings. Although the PLO was mostly remembered worldwide for its terrorist activity it was also involved in peace talks which some may view as more affective. The PLO started originally by mounting surprise, guerrilla attacks on Israeli military targets but was rapidly realized to be pointless as small, unequipped, Palestinian splinter cells were not going to unravel the might that was the Israeli army. The PLO soon resorted to terrorism which proved much more successful in attracting attention for their cause. They used several methods such as taking hostages at public events as seen at the Munich Olympics, which was especially beneficial as it was broadcast around the globe getting maximum coverage for the PLO. ...read more.

Middle

In return the PLO would be allowed to enter negotiations that might lead to the Palestinian controls of Gaza and the West Bank. In 1987 the people of the West Bank and Gaza started an uprising called Intifada. This convinced Arafat that the time was right and subsequently publicly agreed to the American demands in 1988. The uprising made it look like Arafat was accepting from a strong position. The American government welcomed them into the peace talks. This understandably angered a lot of Palestinians as accepting Israel went against everything the Palestinians have fought for. The angered Palestinians looked to another group called Hamas this group was not willing to comprimise at all with the Israeli government, Arafat saw that it was important that they found peace soon before they took over and there would be no chance of peace. This all put pressure on Arafat to strike up a peace deal with Israel. In 1990 Iraq, led by Saddam Hussein invaded Kuwait. ...read more.

Conclusion

the agreement; Israeli armed forces remained present in the Palestinian territories and it offered nothing to the Palestinians living in refugee camps in Lebanon, Jordan and Syria. All this angered a minority of Palestinians including Hamas and some frections in the PLO. It is clear from this that the peaceful methods of the PLO brought about this peace agreement in Oslo. All they accomplished through the use of terrorism was aggravating the Israelis so much that they would invade countries just to try and destroy them, in the process the PLO getting kicked out of the country as seen in Jordan and Lebanon. They did manage to gain publicity but some may argue it was the wrong kind and they did manage to gain supporters but then again they lost some when they adopted terrorism as their main offensive. They achieved much more with the use of peace talks and accepting terms set out by the Americans yet they did have to accept Israel as a state an that was against everything they had believed in from the start. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1945-1991 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1945-1991 essays

  1. Are any of these reasons more important that the others is causing some Palestinians ...

    Because of these events the Arabs started acts of terrorism and in the 1930's the Jews started to emigrate from Germany to Palestine. This led to a civil war between the Arabs and Jews. And then in 1947 a huge decision by the UN meant the Jews would get back their own state.

  2. Did the PLO achieve anything using terrorism

    The PLO used terrorism and guerrilla fighting to keep themselves in the public eye around the world. It meant publicity for the Palestinian cause, and was supported by many of the splinter cell organisations inside the PLO. For instance, George Habash, the leader of the PFLP, said 'We believe that

  1. Arab Israeli Conflict

    Israel, Most Gazans live in eight refugee comps in which the United Nations delivers health, education and other services. A lot of the Palestinians are squashed into this area and the living conditions are extreme. The Palestinians are treated unjustly and the Israelis have no right in making the Palestinians suffer the way they have.

  2. Free essay

    2.) Did the peaceful methods of the PLO achieve more, or less, than terrorism

    This involved Israelis withdrawing from the West Bank and the Gaza Strip.President Clinton of the United States brought Yitzhak Rabin and Yasser Arafat togther for a historic handshake after the signing of the Israei-PLO peace accord at the White House on the 13th September 1993.

  1. Question 2. Explain why the rest of the World is so interested in the ...

    Said Iain Duncan Smith, the former Conservative leader. Jihad has been quite significant in the Arab-Israeli conflict as the Muslims wasn't to protect what is rightfully theirs. The literal meaning of Jihad is struggle or effort, and it means much more than holy war.

  2. The basic idea of my project is to demonstrate that Colombia's global reputation, drugs ...

    It is obvious that Colombia's global reputation has been decaying over the past decade. This has to stop. I think that we're taking too much time to ask for a bit of respect. (Carlos Ulloa says: The Resolution 141 of the U.S congress "May 23 2001" demands that the U.S

  1. Cold War Short Essays - Questions and Answers.

    One reason why relations changed was because of Reagan?s Evil Empire speech in 1983. In this speech he claimed that the USSR were ?morally evil? and that the real crisis was not bombs and weapons; rather it was the test of US moral, faith and will.

  2. How successful were the PLO in promoting its cause between 1960-1980?

    Such as in 1976 when a PFLP splinter group hijacked a plane with one hundred civilian hostages, who in the end were safe but it didn?t fail to send the Israelis a threatening message. Many Arab groups and communities began to build up respect for the PLO for showing their resistance against Israeli power.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work