• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the power of television force the United States to leave Vietnam

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

How useful are Sources A to C to explain why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam? By: Reem Berhane The sources A, B and C, give us some insight into why the United States became involved in the war in Vietnam. Alternatively, it does not tell us the full story. In source A, President Johnson is giving his public speech, on April 1965 [a month after 'Operation Rolling Thunder' began], about stopping Communism. He says, "We fight in Vietnam because we have a promise to keep". The 'Truman Doctrine' is a list of various promises signed and written by every American president. Johnson signed this in 1948. The promise they're fighting for; 'promise to help any threatened by Communism'. And that is exactly what they intend to do. The 'Domino Theory' is also another reason; they're involved in the war in Vietnam. It's the fact, that if you let one country fall to Communism other countries will, one after the other, like dominoes, And so the U.S. ...read more.

Middle

However the way, Christianity appeals to the U.S. is very biased. In my opinion, I find source A, very useful, but however limited because there is no actual fact. Everything said is opinion based. It's a very biased speech, because it's just President Johnson's speech. Also, he is telling the public what they want to hear, he's therefore trying to persuade the U.S. public. In source B, President Johnson is speaking in a private conversation in May 1964. At this time Lyndon Johnson only just became president, but when he was vice president he knew Vietnam quite well. Johnson, in this speech is saying a number of things to criticize the U.S. public about the knowledge they have of Vietnam; [which is not a lot]. This private opinion states that Johnson thinks USA can not win this war. And he obviously has a very low opinion of the U.S. public. ...read more.

Conclusion

This part of the conversation especially was biased because Chomsky himself is an Anti-American, and is therefore being biased towards America. Also, over exaggerating when stating your opinion, makes it very weak. Therefore this source isn't as useful because of the over exaggeration. To conclude, all of the sources value usefulness but also have limitations. In my view source B is most useful because, it was a private conversation with Johnson, criticising and humiliating the U.S. public and their knowledge of Vietnam. The conversation, had swearing involved which would be quite shocking knowing that, in those days the U.S. people didn't appreciate bad language. This conversation was supposed to be kept secret and private. On the other hand, secret tapes were hidden in all of the rooms is the 'White House' recording everything said. So when this conversation was found, it was revealed to everyone. You would find a secret most useful in this situation because you find out the real truth, of Johnson's thoughts and opinions, which are quite shocking in this conversation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Explain why the United States became increasingly involved in the war in Vietnam

    In the intermittence between 1956 and 1960, nothing much occurred aside from Diem's continual purging of Communists in the south and a terrorist bombing in Saigon, 1957; part of a wider campaign by the Vietcong (whose name now averted any patriotic meaning)

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    The Vietcong tactics were based around those used by Mao Zedong in china. The Vietcong worked together in small groups. They were split up in to groups of about ten or fewer soldiers. The groups were known as cells. The groups worked together however the knowledge they had of each other was to a bare minimum.

  1. This statement suggests that television was an important reason why the United States lost ...

    They thought it was a Nazi thing slaughtering all those people who were innocent. This would have maybe contributed to television losing the war for America if it got shown as an interview on television. It may not have been shown on television so may not have helped contribute to television losing the war.

  2. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the problems faced ...

    scored so low on the intelligence tests that they would never have been let into the normal peacetime army." This quotation says a 'rising number' but it doesn't mean a majority so there will be some that are well educated.

  1. Did The Power Of Television Force The United States To Leave Vietnam

    This source is trying not to fault the blame upon to the soldiers, but it's signifying that many soldiers had useful motives. I quote "many of them thought they were going to something courageous on behalf of their country". This was something which they thought was the ('American Ideal').

  2. Explain why the United States withdrew its forces from Vietnam in 1973

    A key factor in forcing the US out of the war was the strength of the peace movement in the United States. The war, which could clearly not be won, had become very unpopular which led to the very foundations of the war, with American pride, being crumbled away.

  1. How useful are sources A, B, C in explaining why the U.S.A. involved in ...

    It leaves out huge chunks of important information such as the advisors that were at the time in Vietnam as well as the obvious worries about the spread of communism to South Vietnam and the concerns about the domino theory.

  2. How useful are the sources A to G for explaining why there was an ...

    The result of this continuing spiral of poor strategy and younger and younger recruits et al. meant many of the objectives which had been planned, ultimately failed in response to the effort which was being put in; low morale in existing, serving soldiers also played its part.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work