• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the successes of the Vienna settlement ou tweigh its failures?

Extracts from this document...


Did the successes of the Vienna settlement outweigh its failures? The congress of Vienna and its subsequent agreement marked a stabilisation of the balance of powers in Europe after the Napoleonic and Revolutionary Wars. It heralded the start of a century of Europe free from major conflict. Despite this, Historians disagree as to whether it was a success. For much of the nineteenth century, the settlement attracted more criticism than praise. Von Gentz, Metternich's principal advisor commented: " The congress resulted in nothing but the restorations which had already been effected by arms... quite arbitrary alterations in the possessions of the smaller states, but... no great measure for... the general good." Vienna led to the strengthening the position of the four greatest powers, Austria, Prussia, Russia and Britain. By reinforcing and merging many of the smaller stares, it created a stable situation in Europe whereby no one power could expand excessively. The 'Cordon Sanitaire' around France assayed public fears and ensured France could not rise again, while the strengthening of Central Europe prevented Russia from securing too strong a position. ...read more.


Prussia took control of the Rhineland and Saxony, going against desires in both states to become independent. Cavour, the Prime Minister of Piedmont in 1852, commented: "Resting on no Principle, neither that of legitimacy, nor of national interests, nor of popular will, taking account of neither of geographical conditions, nor of general interests, this august assembly, acting only by right of the strongest, erected a political edifice without any moral foundation." This was a view held by leading figures in most of the smaller states of Europe, accentuated by the refusal of the great powers to allow the lesser powers to take part in the congress. It has been argued that this disregard to self-deterministic feelings led to many of the revolutions that took place between 1815 and 1848 ("The Age of Revolution"), however, it should be noted that in 1815, nationalistic feelings were limited to a tiny section of the population, the middle classes. As well as this, those feelings of nationalism that did exist were bases on Xenophobia rather than the desire for self-determination. ...read more.


Specifically, the desire for peace through strengthening existing countries and the desire for no great power to be too displeased with the settlement. The pursuit of these two aims are what led to the long period of relative peace that followed. The Settlement may have failed in terms of internal order within the countries, (the many small rebellions), but in terms of collective European peace, it was incredible successful, marking the beginning of a long period of international harmony. While the settlement gave little ground to reform, it did represent a cautious step in the right direction. From the perspective of the present, away from the prejudices of the times, the Settlement was generally successful, especially when compared to more modern attempts at peace treaties between European powers. On the other hand, whether it would have been possible to satisfy a little more the urge for liberal and nationalism without severely hampering chances of International peace, is difficult to say. What is concludable however is that a greatly different peace treaty would have most likely led to one of the Great Powers feeling dissatisfied, and therefore threatening the delicate peace to readdress the balance. Alex Bartho L6JS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    There was a much greater number of unemployed as there was not enough employment for them all, so these ex-troops had to be paid benefit. This money had to be raised by increasing the taxes which made the whole of the country angry not just those who had lost their jobs.

  2. The Vienna Settlement

    It was agreed that Russia received most of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw while Prussia gained two-fifths of the Kingdom of Saxony. Other arrangements made by the Congress included the cession to Austria of Lombardy and Venetia in northern Italy, in place of her abandoned Netherlands and territory along the Adriatic coast and territory along the Adriatic coast.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    - Russia occupied Moldavia, Wallachia and the Adrianople. Finally the Treaty of Adrianople was signed. - The treaty stated that Greece gets independent from Turkey but she still needs to give yearly tribute. - Moreover, Serbia and some other Balkan states were given autonomy. - Turkey also lost some territory.

  2. To What Extent Was The United Kingdom Successful in Negotiations at the Congress of ...

    In June 9, 1815, the Congress's final decree was signed. Nine days before Napoleon was finally defeated at Waterloo. The congress's principal results were the enlargement of Russia and Prussia, which was given extensive territory in the Rhineland, the consolidation of Germany, the German confederation being put under the control

  1. The failures of Gallipoli

    Britain did not have enough soldiers to carry out the plan leading to a stalemate and trench warfare. They needed 100,000 soldiers but only got 20,000. This shows the inadequate troops and supplies in Turkey, and also poor command because the commanders should have seen that 20,000 soldiers was not

  2. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    With media pressure representing public calling the Germans in the other room may have made a guess that their future wasn't as rosy and cosy as Wilson had suggested. As June 24th then June 28th got closer, they had probably been made aware of the British light cruisers and destroyer

  1. The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles in Addressing the Causes of ...

    On the other hand, the League was not successful in stopping conflict altogether. For example, despite the League's efforts, they could not stop Poland from annexing Vilna or Italy from occupying Corfu in 1923. And it was difficult for the permanent members of the League to put aside their self

  2. "The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests"

    Without the trade from the other countries, Britain would have nothing to trade its own goods with and therefore the British people would have to buy there own produce. She (Britain) also needed to be eqipped to defend her allies if they needed, this would take time and money which, at that time Britain did not have.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work