• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Did the successes of the Vienna settlement ou tweigh its failures?

Extracts from this document...


Did the successes of the Vienna settlement outweigh its failures? The congress of Vienna and its subsequent agreement marked a stabilisation of the balance of powers in Europe after the Napoleonic and Revolutionary Wars. It heralded the start of a century of Europe free from major conflict. Despite this, Historians disagree as to whether it was a success. For much of the nineteenth century, the settlement attracted more criticism than praise. Von Gentz, Metternich's principal advisor commented: " The congress resulted in nothing but the restorations which had already been effected by arms... quite arbitrary alterations in the possessions of the smaller states, but... no great measure for... the general good." Vienna led to the strengthening the position of the four greatest powers, Austria, Prussia, Russia and Britain. By reinforcing and merging many of the smaller stares, it created a stable situation in Europe whereby no one power could expand excessively. The 'Cordon Sanitaire' around France assayed public fears and ensured France could not rise again, while the strengthening of Central Europe prevented Russia from securing too strong a position. ...read more.


Prussia took control of the Rhineland and Saxony, going against desires in both states to become independent. Cavour, the Prime Minister of Piedmont in 1852, commented: "Resting on no Principle, neither that of legitimacy, nor of national interests, nor of popular will, taking account of neither of geographical conditions, nor of general interests, this august assembly, acting only by right of the strongest, erected a political edifice without any moral foundation." This was a view held by leading figures in most of the smaller states of Europe, accentuated by the refusal of the great powers to allow the lesser powers to take part in the congress. It has been argued that this disregard to self-deterministic feelings led to many of the revolutions that took place between 1815 and 1848 ("The Age of Revolution"), however, it should be noted that in 1815, nationalistic feelings were limited to a tiny section of the population, the middle classes. As well as this, those feelings of nationalism that did exist were bases on Xenophobia rather than the desire for self-determination. ...read more.


Specifically, the desire for peace through strengthening existing countries and the desire for no great power to be too displeased with the settlement. The pursuit of these two aims are what led to the long period of relative peace that followed. The Settlement may have failed in terms of internal order within the countries, (the many small rebellions), but in terms of collective European peace, it was incredible successful, marking the beginning of a long period of international harmony. While the settlement gave little ground to reform, it did represent a cautious step in the right direction. From the perspective of the present, away from the prejudices of the times, the Settlement was generally successful, especially when compared to more modern attempts at peace treaties between European powers. On the other hand, whether it would have been possible to satisfy a little more the urge for liberal and nationalism without severely hampering chances of International peace, is difficult to say. What is concludable however is that a greatly different peace treaty would have most likely led to one of the Great Powers feeling dissatisfied, and therefore threatening the delicate peace to readdress the balance. Alex Bartho L6JS ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    French, it would have only complicated matter further if they had been there. They did not know anything about the peace conference so did not know anything that had been said at the conference so still did not know that the Treaty was not to be based on the fourteen-point plan.

  2. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    and Turkey fought against Russia. * Russia was alone to fight the European countries. Finally, Russia was defeated. * Peace Conference after the Crimean War * 1. A Black Sea Clause was set up: asked Russia to give up fortification in the Black Sea. Russia had exclusive rights to use the Black Sea before.

  1. The Vienna Settlement

    It was agreed that Russia received most of the Grand Duchy of Warsaw while Prussia gained two-fifths of the Kingdom of Saxony. Other arrangements made by the Congress included the cession to Austria of Lombardy and Venetia in northern Italy, in place of her abandoned Netherlands and territory along the Adriatic coast and territory along the Adriatic coast.

  2. The Successes and Failures of the Treaty of Versailles in Addressing the Causes of ...

    On the other hand, the League was not successful in stopping conflict altogether. For example, despite the League's efforts, they could not stop Poland from annexing Vilna or Italy from occupying Corfu in 1923. And it was difficult for the permanent members of the League to put aside their self

  1. To What Extent Was The United Kingdom Successful in Negotiations at the Congress of ...

    Even Britain, which went to the conference with no ambitions on territorial rearrangements that would favour the country, obtained some compensation through the acquisition of colonial bases. Finally yet importantly, Legitimacy was the other subject of discussion at Vienna. This topic would be used by all nations to discuss the

  2. The failures of Gallipoli

    If they thought about this maybe less troops would have died and therefore maybe there would not have been a lack of troops. Dust and dirt also made life very difficult. Trenches sometimes had 8 meters difference between them so you couldn't throw grenades from one to the other due to the chance of them being thrown back.

  1. Analyse the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Versailles Settlement.

    Expectation that plebiscites, the right to national self-determination and access to the means of production would be adequately moderately (or morally for that matter) distributed was a silly notion on a grand scale. That Italy felt cheated, Russia ignored meant a poverty-addled start to world peace.

  2. "The Versailles Peace Settlement failed to secure British Foreign Policy interests"

    government, or by voting with the party in power to prevent its defeat. Britain also needed to be defended both internally and externally. The trade routes that Britain used were mainly through france and Germany into other neighbouring countries, without this entry, Britains trade would decrease, meaning unemployment and reduced customer demand.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work