• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

Extracts from this document...


Michael Argenti Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides Every historian has certain personal, social and political contexts which affect their writing of history. This can be seen as early as Ancient Greek between the two historians Herodotus and Thucydides. The Greeks were amongst the first in the West to draw up histories by inquiring into such information that led to the facts concerning the past. It is a process that requires careful collection of information, judgment of sources, and the application of reason. Therefore, it attempts to develop history from a scientific rather than a mythical basis. Herodotus was the first Greek historian and is famous for the nine books he wrote on the rise of the Persian Empire, the Persian invaders of Greece in 490 and 480 B.C., the heroic fight of the Greeks against the invaders, and the final Greek victory (the 'Histories'). Thucydides was a Greek historian of the 400's B.C., who is famous for his 'History of the Peloponnesian War', in which he describes a war between Athens and Sparta (431B.C. - 404B.C.). Both historians used differing skills of re-telling the past and analysing the events that occurred. Herodotus' use of the historical method involved the careful accumulation of data, followed by deciding what conclusions the data support; this in turn greatly influenced later historians. ...read more.


is said; but I am not obliged to believe it all alike - a remark which may be understood to apply to my whole History.' It is important to note that Herodotus, being an immigrant into Athens, had to be able to gain support from the Athenian people and therefore, subconsciously adopting and echoing the Athenian mindset, he glorifies their contribution to the Persian wars. Herodotus also had an element of luck as one of the major Athenian statesmen, Pericles, was the son of Xanthippes, the general who defeated the Persians at Mycale. Herodotus consequently realised the momentous significance of the Persian wars and seised his opportunity. As a result, some of Herodotus' work was swayed into providing a biased or one-sided Athenian view on the Persian war; and this is important to keep in mind. This mentality was already present in other city-states, which felt vexed by the lavish glory Herodotus put upon Athens at the expense of Sparta, which led his common name the 'father of history' to be branded 'father of lies'. An example of the bias can be seen when he refers to the Persians (in reality, most who are royalty and aristocrats) as 'barbarians'. This is due to the fact that he was writing for the Athenians, to whom his loyalty is axiomatic, and he has chosen a selection of material that helps reinforce his view whilst excluding some differing information. ...read more.


yet after his expulsion in 424 B.C., he lived on his property in Thrace. There he spent a great deal of time travelling, which gave him the benefit of enjoying the rare advantage of contemplating the war from various points of view. Thucydides thought the war was worth recording because, it was the greatest the Greeks had ever fought. He set out to produce an accurate, unbiased account of the war, whilst visiting battlefields and talked to survivors from both sides. He also analysed the underlying political causes of the war and reported political speeches as a way of showing opposing viewpoints and reasons for certain actions. In conclusion, Herodotus had to deal with sorting through a range of secondary sources in order to document his findings, and at the same time appeal to the Athenian public. On the other hand Thucydides, the failed general, who, mixed with his aristocratic connections from all sides and brooding upon Athens over years of exile, attempted to create an accurate and precise recount of the Peloponnesian War. Both these points therefore explain the reasons for the differing aims and purposes of each historian, yet it must be remembered that social and political contexts did not only affect the reliability of the work from Ancient Greek historians, but rather has existed throughout time. To this day it is difficult sometimes to decipher what is a statement of fact versus what is influenced by popular socio-political principles. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. To what extent can historians be objective?

    Zinn assigns to history a social task. The choice of what to write, from the array of available material, should be made with this idea in mind. Zinn likens historical writing to mapmaking - to aim for full objectivity in historical study is analogous to attempting to compose a map which shows every single feature of a piece of terrain.

  2. Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you ...

    This gives the impression that he regards some of the digressions that he recounts in his book, simply as stories, and that if you are credulous, as he makes out to be then you will believe. Herodotus does indeed appear to tackle his history like a true historian, when it comes to sources.

  1. It was the lack of buffalo that killed off the Plains Indian culture in ...

    In the same year at 'the battle of Wounded Knee' the settlers' army slaughtered the Indians army, women, children, even the elderly as they tried to flee.

  2. From where did Elizabeth face the greatest challenge to her aims in the framing ...

    or eight of the members listed later conducted official Privy Council business. Closer examination of the document would appear to nullify Neale's use of it as evidence of organised 'pressure from the left.'7 Haigh affirms the view that the so called 'puritan choir' was 'not an organised pressure group able to dominate the commons.'8 P.

  1. How does the Verulamium site enable modern historians to understand and explain life in ...

    This would help the Romans who lived in Verulamium because with the roads that were built they would be able to travel to "Londinium" and trade with other Romans to get money and materials. The trade links available to Verulamium were a major economic advantage because they were able to

  2. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    Modern history does tend to focus on the motives behind actions and occurrences. Events could never occur without a reason; this could be why Thucydides' work is recognised as a guideline for modern history. Tacitus' work is highly colourful and descriptive and may seem to be more akin to fiction than fact.

  1. Describe the problems of living in a newly set up town in the West.

    Other jobs available to women were also more difficult, like farming, as they were simply not strong enough to work the land on their own. Also, with a lack of women in the towns, they often faced abuse from single men, which could sometimes turn nasty, in the forms of rape and physical abuse.

  2. The Third Crusade seen from different sides

    From Source F we can learn that the Muslims and Saladin hated Lord Richard evidence to show this is 'When news that King Richard was approaching was brought to those who lived in Jerusalem they were struck with terror,' meaning they didnt want to face their enemy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work