• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides.

Extracts from this document...


Michael Argenti Different Aims and Purposes of the Historians Herodotus and Thucydides Every historian has certain personal, social and political contexts which affect their writing of history. This can be seen as early as Ancient Greek between the two historians Herodotus and Thucydides. The Greeks were amongst the first in the West to draw up histories by inquiring into such information that led to the facts concerning the past. It is a process that requires careful collection of information, judgment of sources, and the application of reason. Therefore, it attempts to develop history from a scientific rather than a mythical basis. Herodotus was the first Greek historian and is famous for the nine books he wrote on the rise of the Persian Empire, the Persian invaders of Greece in 490 and 480 B.C., the heroic fight of the Greeks against the invaders, and the final Greek victory (the 'Histories'). Thucydides was a Greek historian of the 400's B.C., who is famous for his 'History of the Peloponnesian War', in which he describes a war between Athens and Sparta (431B.C. - 404B.C.). Both historians used differing skills of re-telling the past and analysing the events that occurred. Herodotus' use of the historical method involved the careful accumulation of data, followed by deciding what conclusions the data support; this in turn greatly influenced later historians. ...read more.


is said; but I am not obliged to believe it all alike - a remark which may be understood to apply to my whole History.' It is important to note that Herodotus, being an immigrant into Athens, had to be able to gain support from the Athenian people and therefore, subconsciously adopting and echoing the Athenian mindset, he glorifies their contribution to the Persian wars. Herodotus also had an element of luck as one of the major Athenian statesmen, Pericles, was the son of Xanthippes, the general who defeated the Persians at Mycale. Herodotus consequently realised the momentous significance of the Persian wars and seised his opportunity. As a result, some of Herodotus' work was swayed into providing a biased or one-sided Athenian view on the Persian war; and this is important to keep in mind. This mentality was already present in other city-states, which felt vexed by the lavish glory Herodotus put upon Athens at the expense of Sparta, which led his common name the 'father of history' to be branded 'father of lies'. An example of the bias can be seen when he refers to the Persians (in reality, most who are royalty and aristocrats) as 'barbarians'. This is due to the fact that he was writing for the Athenians, to whom his loyalty is axiomatic, and he has chosen a selection of material that helps reinforce his view whilst excluding some differing information. ...read more.


yet after his expulsion in 424 B.C., he lived on his property in Thrace. There he spent a great deal of time travelling, which gave him the benefit of enjoying the rare advantage of contemplating the war from various points of view. Thucydides thought the war was worth recording because, it was the greatest the Greeks had ever fought. He set out to produce an accurate, unbiased account of the war, whilst visiting battlefields and talked to survivors from both sides. He also analysed the underlying political causes of the war and reported political speeches as a way of showing opposing viewpoints and reasons for certain actions. In conclusion, Herodotus had to deal with sorting through a range of secondary sources in order to document his findings, and at the same time appeal to the Athenian public. On the other hand Thucydides, the failed general, who, mixed with his aristocratic connections from all sides and brooding upon Athens over years of exile, attempted to create an accurate and precise recount of the Peloponnesian War. Both these points therefore explain the reasons for the differing aims and purposes of each historian, yet it must be remembered that social and political contexts did not only affect the reliability of the work from Ancient Greek historians, but rather has existed throughout time. To this day it is difficult sometimes to decipher what is a statement of fact versus what is influenced by popular socio-political principles. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE History Projects section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE History Projects essays

  1. What are the main differences between Tacitus and Thucydides?

    It is indistinguishable from what many would class as 'history'. What this method does do, however, is imprint the scene firmly in the mind of the reader. This is seen, for example, in the description of the Messalina's indulgence just before her affair is discovered.

  2. Herodotus: The Father of History or the Father of Lies. Which Judgement do you ...

    To the people of the 5th century, myth and legend were considered as much a part of their heritage and history as more recent events. Herodotus was the first author to make clear distinctions between 'real history' and myth. In this period, the word Histor�� simply meant an enquiry, rather than an investigation into the past.

  1. Cats in Ancient Egypt

    Millions of domestic cats were specially cultivated in temples associated with feline deities, only to be sacrificed, mummified and sold to devotees as temple offerings. Some cats were mummified elaborately, while others more simply. The cats were wrapped in lengths of linen and placed in elaborate coffins.

  2. De Bernieres describes History as 'Hearsay tempered with myth and hazy memory.' How does ...

    This view contrasts with the view of their role in resisting the Nazis, held by local people in Cephallonia, where the island is littered with monuments and memorials to the resistance fighters who died during the civil war. This view of the lack of activity from ELAS is most controversial

  1. It was the lack of buffalo that killed off the Plains Indian culture in ...

    horses and men than the white settlers who were just going into the villages, killing the villagers and taking their land, like when Evans a General in the army who believed the white settlers should kill the Indians, 750 troops marched into Sand Creek and murdered over 200 villagers.

  2. How does the Verulamium site enable modern historians to understand and explain life in ...

    travel to other parts of the country to because of roads system built and they would be able to travel to other parts of the Roman Empire to trade too. The fertile land around the banks of the River Ver is the final economic advantage.

  1. Objective histories.

    The past is not handed to us directly, but we perceive it through the eyes of the historians, who shape it to reflect their own political, social, cultural, religious and educational stances. Conversely, we have the primary sources/evidence available to us, which provide us with information about the past with an absolute minimum of interference of historians.

  2. The Third Crusade seen from different sides

    however we can consider him being truthful. Both Sources agree on the fact that Richards?s army was physically strong and powerful, this can be evident in the lexis used such as ?coat of a mail? in both eye witness reports, there was also another similarity in both of them which

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work