• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do sources A-F support the view that the Nazis succeeded in creating a Volksgemeinschaft in Germany between 1933-39?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Laura Spandler Do sources A-F support the view that the Nazis succeeded in creating a Volksgemeinschaft in Germany between 1933-39? When the Nazis came to power in Germany in 1933 one of their main aims was to create a Volksgemeinschaft, a united, national community based on blood and race, in which the people would be politically committed to the Nazi regime. This new society required a change in the consciousness of the German people, perhaps not possible in the short time the Nazis had. Sources A-F paint an extremely complex picture of the level of success achieved, but the overall feeling is that at best the Nazis achieved apathy towards the policy, not a belief in their ideology, although it very much depended on the individual's experience. Propaganda was a major tool used by the Nazis in inculcating their ideology, and the radio, source A, was especially important as 70% of Germans at the time owned a radio and, along with loud speakers in the streets, all could hear the F�hrer. However, looking at sources A and B together, we realise even though everybody could hear the F�hrer most people didn't listen. ...read more.

Middle

Neither Maschmann nor Clare had any personal reason to oppose the regime and so they could be apathetic towards the bad parts. There is evidence that the Volksgemeinschaft could have succeeded; sources C and E show partial successes for the regime. Source C says, 'Germany was a wonderful place to be alive' as long as you were not in a minority group, but by definition the majority of people never are. However, the Nazis could never succeed if many groups were excluded. Source E shows partial success for Volksgemeinschaft. Maschmann says she experienced the desired egalitarian society in the youth camps, also believing it 'could be extended infinitely'. However, in both sources the reasons for attraction to the regime were not a belief in the ideology, key to the success of a real Volksgemeinschaft, but they were more for desire to be part of a group or for personal gain, Maschmann says that it gave her 'an escape from a childish, narrow life'. She also admits that in reality it was only successful on a small scale. ...read more.

Conclusion

The question of the success of the Volksgemeinschaft is immeasurable because it depended on the experience of the individual. For some like in sources C and E it was a good thing, but for others it was terrible, Jews for example. Different groups in society reacted differently to the Nazi message. There is evidence, in sources D and E, that the Nazis had the most success with the youth of Germany and the least with the 'older industrial workers'. However, there is no suggestion made in any of the sources that any group believed whole-heartedly in the ideology of the Volksgemeinschaft, key to its success. Many of the reasons for support were for personal gain or patriotism, as in source C. This means they achieved apathy towards the ideology, rather than belief. Overall the success of the Volksgemeinschaft was extremely limited, there is no evidence to show that even a small part of German society believed in the ideology of the Volksgemeinschaft and the Nazi regime, but many conformed to Nazi policies. However, this was not what the Nazis intended. They needed a complete change in attitudes but as source D says, 'there can be no suggestion of Nazism having effected a social revolution'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How Far Did The Nazis Control Everyday Life In Germany After 1933

    At the weekends the groups went camping and sang songs just like in the Hitler Youth however they altered the lyrics to purposefully mock Germany. When they spotted bands of Hitler Youth they taunted and sometimes attacked them. In contrast to the Hitler Youth the Pirates included both boys and

  2. Did Hitler succeed in creating a Volksgemeinschaft?

    The future role of the girls was to be good mothers and be the perfect housekeeper and wife for the working men. Their lessons were based around looking after the home and family. Biology lessons were used to teach Nazi racial ideas i.e.

  1. Why Did Kristallnacht Take Place? (a) A ...

    It completely contradicts the statement that Kristallnacht was spontaneous, as it clearly states that 'most German people have nothing to do with these riots and burnings', therefore implying that Kristallnacht was a planned event by the Nazis. Source F is a cartoon about Kristallnacht, published in a Russian newspaper on 10 November 1938.

  2. To what extent and with what degree of success did the Nazis establish a ...

    Fuhrerprinzip (principle of leader) was the oath of allegiance that people were acquired to swear to Hitler and by which he was acknowledged as the sole political leader. By this act afterwards, the democracy in Germany was considered dead.3 C.

  1. How far did the Nazis control everydaylife in Germany after 1933?

    The Nazi government used a mixture of force, and rewards to try to win workers support. They banned trade unions in 1933, in case they tried to organise opposition against Hitler. But Hitler also created a lot of jobs. The number of unemployment's dropped spectacularly from 6 million to 300,000!

  2. To what extent do you consider that Hitler and the Nazis had achieved their ...

    German Children were to be brought up as good National Socialists and loyal followers of Hitler. A new way of education was introduced alongside the Hitler Youth movement. With the youngsters Hitler was going to make a new world. Children were to have physical education every day, many after school youths clubs were introduced.

  1. The sources A-F all show the different impact and success of Volksgemeinschaft in Germany ...

    These "undesirables" included outsiders such as Jews and Homosexuals. Maschmann supports Clare's comment on how Nazi Germany was a "wonderful place to be alive" for those inside Volksgemeinschaft by speaking of her enjoyment of youth group activities. George Clare's comment also implies that there was successful persecution of the Jews

  2. ­­How much support was there for the Nazi regime between 1933 and 1939?

    What he said might not have been an accurate representation of what he thought, or what was true. However, he said this to a Social Democratic Party agent in the summer of 1936. The SDP were opposed to Hitler, but by this time, they had been forced underground, so this would have been said in secret.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work