• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam? Source A tells us that the reasons for the USA becoming involved in Vietnam were mainly because of the threat from communism which can be better explained through the Domino Theory. This was the idea that the countries of South East Asia were closely linked together and if one fell to communism the theory was that the others would also fall, like a row of dominoes. Source A says that Vietnam was important as a free country and its economy was essential that to of South East Asia. ...read more.


Sources A and B support each other as source A is written by Kennedy, US Senator and source B by the State Department. They are both part of the USA government which possibly leads to bias. Both see the US involvement as a battle against the communists and tried to appeal to the US people to support this. Kennedy's ideas were very similar to that of the State Department. The Americans made it clear they would fight because they were a strong enemy of communism and that was their main reason. Both sources were written at about the same time. However source C doesn't support the evidence in source A. ...read more.


They were persuaded to volunteer by the saying 'ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country' and as war is always attractive to young men it was easy to get volunteers. Being a fighter in the war he took a much more down-to-earth view of the war, he felt their mission was not to save democracy but to kill as many Vietcong as possible. He tells us that the US officers were given body count targets of dead Vietcong. Sources A and B are both involved in the US government so they share the same views. C is by a fighter from the war, he sees what's happening in the war better than the US government and therefore has a different view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    This source cannot be seen as being very reliable because we cannot be sure that the same number of people form the Australian public were asked this after a year and thus the results could be fairly inaccurate. The source is merely a table presenting information.

  2. How useful are sources A to C in helping to explain why the United ...

    President Johnson strongly believed that South Vietnam alone could not win the war. What Chomsky was trying to get across was that America's involvement did not help the situation in Vietnam but instead worsened it. Vietnam was devastated. The Americans used a chemical called 'Agent Orange' to destroy the Vietnamese forests in which the Vietcong were hiding.

  1. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    The publicity surrounding the My Lai massacre proved to be an important turning point in American public opinion. It showed the deterioration in the behaviour of US troops and undermined the moral argument about the need to save Vietnam from communism.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    On the other hand this is a Ph. D. Dissertation meaning that it should most likely reliable and be of use for supporting this particular point of view. I am making the assumption that the student did a lot of research into this topic in an effort for the paper

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Source F is biased in Haig's favour as Haig's family asked Duff Cooper to write his biography it is true that if Britain had refused to fight on the Somme the French connections would no longer exist. However just because Haig was in charge doesn't mean he relived Verdun.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    press, news agencies would never have exposed incidents such as those at Trang Bang and the war may well have continued for a long time afterwards. It is worth noting however that Source M indicates the media would bring an end to any future conflict by itself, whilst Source E

  1. Why were there different reactions in the US

    Gruesome events such as these were openly displayed by the media to the world, resulting in arguments against continuing the war.

  2. Australia's Involvement in the Vietnam War

    Australia's alliance with Brittain no longer provided strategic security in the Asia Pacific region and as a result the US became out strongest ally. In order to ensure Australia's security the government signed treaties with countries in the region; these included ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand and United States)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work