• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam? Source A tells us that the reasons for the USA becoming involved in Vietnam were mainly because of the threat from communism which can be better explained through the Domino Theory. This was the idea that the countries of South East Asia were closely linked together and if one fell to communism the theory was that the others would also fall, like a row of dominoes. Source A says that Vietnam was important as a free country and its economy was essential that to of South East Asia. ...read more.

Middle

Sources A and B support each other as source A is written by Kennedy, US Senator and source B by the State Department. They are both part of the USA government which possibly leads to bias. Both see the US involvement as a battle against the communists and tried to appeal to the US people to support this. Kennedy's ideas were very similar to that of the State Department. The Americans made it clear they would fight because they were a strong enemy of communism and that was their main reason. Both sources were written at about the same time. However source C doesn't support the evidence in source A. ...read more.

Conclusion

They were persuaded to volunteer by the saying 'ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country' and as war is always attractive to young men it was easy to get volunteers. Being a fighter in the war he took a much more down-to-earth view of the war, he felt their mission was not to save democracy but to kill as many Vietcong as possible. He tells us that the US officers were given body count targets of dead Vietcong. Sources A and B are both involved in the US government so they share the same views. C is by a fighter from the war, he sees what's happening in the war better than the US government and therefore has a different view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    to fight for, when US troops weren't sure about the reasons for being involved in this war. North Vietnamese were passionate about finishing the war and uniting their country, rather than just wining it. Vietcong felt that by fighting for communism they are doing a noble thing, therefore they were ready to sacrifice their lives for their country.

  2. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    Johnson had hoped to put to use in his vision for the Great Society - instead of helping to improve the lives of Americans, the American economy is vested entirely in continuing the war against North Vietnam. The cartoon also reflects the fact that popular support for the war is

  1. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    that had left it undecided. The year after, October 1970 the majority of people still wanted their forces to be brought back home although the figures had decreased from the year before. More people wanted there forces to continue however more people now had formed a view as there was a fewer percentage of people who left it undecided.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    This therefore infers that media could have been import for the deciding of the course of the war hence making the source not as useful at proving that media did not have an influence on the war. Source Q backs the view that media had not influence and says,' Among

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    that there wasn't a 'better man for the job' an also a German officer called the battle field 'a muddy German grave' all this shows Haig in a better light however he says that 'Haig's numerous mistakes contributed to half a million casualties' Warburton gives a fair account but seems

  2. Why were there different reactions in the US

    Gruesome events such as these were openly displayed by the media to the world, resulting in arguments against continuing the war.

  1. Australia's Involvement in the Vietnam War

    Australia's alliance with Brittain no longer provided strategic security in the Asia Pacific region and as a result the US became out strongest ally. In order to ensure Australia's security the government signed treaties with countries in the region; these included ANZUS (Australia, New Zealand and United States)

  2. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    It suggests that Haig was the reason that people died and also implies that he didn't care. I think that the poster was produced after he died in 1928 because source H said that Haig was a national hero when he died.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work