• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam?

Extracts from this document...


Do sources B & C support the evidence of source A about the reasons for US involvement in South Vietnam? Source A tells us that the reasons for the USA becoming involved in Vietnam were mainly because of the threat from communism which can be better explained through the Domino Theory. This was the idea that the countries of South East Asia were closely linked together and if one fell to communism the theory was that the others would also fall, like a row of dominoes. Source A says that Vietnam was important as a free country and its economy was essential that to of South East Asia. ...read more.


Sources A and B support each other as source A is written by Kennedy, US Senator and source B by the State Department. They are both part of the USA government which possibly leads to bias. Both see the US involvement as a battle against the communists and tried to appeal to the US people to support this. Kennedy's ideas were very similar to that of the State Department. The Americans made it clear they would fight because they were a strong enemy of communism and that was their main reason. Both sources were written at about the same time. However source C doesn't support the evidence in source A. ...read more.


They were persuaded to volunteer by the saying 'ask not what your country can do for you but ask what you can do for your country' and as war is always attractive to young men it was easy to get volunteers. Being a fighter in the war he took a much more down-to-earth view of the war, he felt their mission was not to save democracy but to kill as many Vietcong as possible. He tells us that the US officers were given body count targets of dead Vietcong. Sources A and B are both involved in the US government so they share the same views. C is by a fighter from the war, he sees what's happening in the war better than the US government and therefore has a different view. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Vietnam 1954-1975 essays

  1. Escalation of American involvement in Vietnam

    This showed that USA failed to win the hearts and minds of South Vietnamese people. The other reason, that led USA to failure in Vietnam, was that Vietcong had short and effective supply routes, whilst US had a long supply routes, therefore resources like weapons and other supplies had to travel a long distance to reach Vietnam.

  2. Why are there different views about the influence of media on the course of ...

    it says that the media has little power to change policies of the system for policy making thus also inferring that the media would not have had enough power to influence the course of the war. I.E causing the USA to pull out.

  1. Vietnam Coursework Comparing sources

    He then says that a friend compares the crimes at My Lai to the crimes committed by the Schutzstaffel (SS) or Geheime Staatspolizei (Gestapo) of National Socialist Germany, quoting them as saying "It was a Nazi thing.

  2. Did the power of television force the US to leave Vietnam?

    It is however useful is helping us to understand why America was not able to win over the Vietnamese people and how the American methods left Vietnam devastated. Source G: Source G is the reaction of an American soldier after having heard about the My Lai massacre.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    Anthony Livesey also mentions about how Haig's greatest failing was 'often misplaced optimism' which was because he was getting misinformed about what was happening at the battles. Source E is written by the prime minister of the time David Lloyd George and is a biased view of the battle of

  2. Why did the US get involved in Vietnam

    This is because the main purpose of this speech was to make the American people have faith in their president and belie that it was right for them to enter the war. Source B Source B is private conversation that President Johnson is having with an unknown listener.

  1. John Keegan, a modern military historian, suggests that Haig was an efficient and highly ...

    This source does not support Keegan's view. It is the opposite view. Source C. Haig wrote all the three parts and they are quite useful for showing Haig's views at the start of the battle of the Somme. The title of the source says Haig wrote this first part in June 1916 before the battle of the Somme.

  2. Why were there different reactions in the US

    Gruesome events such as these were openly displayed by the media to the world, resulting in arguments against continuing the war.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work