• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources agree or disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


Q5: Do these sources agree or disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971? Explain your answer. These sources both agree and disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971 however there are more differences than similarities. The sources are both written by Historians and at the same time so their verdicts are going to be based on many different views as highlighted by source I 'The Myriad Faces of War' therefor their verdicts have many similarities. Sources I and J both contain several similarities they both largely emphasise the fact that the morale of the troops was low 'severe fighting, was having a bad effect on morale of everyone concerned.' This was due to the lack of success; between July and November only four miles were gained. ...read more.


This is similar to source J in that Warner feels that Haig's persistence was not justified, Haig was willing to sacrifice many men to eventually win the war. Source J is titled 'passchendaele' this source is directed directly at passchendaele where as Source I is based upon the many different views of war. Source J writes about General Von Kuhl, a German historian said 'the Flanders battle wore down the German strength to a degree which damage could not be repaired.' It also says that Haig was right in his judgement to continue with attrition. This is far more positive than Source I about the result of Haig's attack as it shows that it was not just the British morale which was low but also the German's 'Against the weight of the enemy's material, the troops [The Germans] no longer displayed their old stubbornness.' ...read more.


to the sacrifice' Both sources open with a moderately positive start 'Haig's great effort' and 'The Australian historian is scrupulously fair,' they both agree on that morale was low. The British were holding Ypres as a symbol of morale and propaganda. They should have retreated behind the natural defence of the canal earlier to massively reduce casualties, however they only did this in 1918. The two sources both agree and disagree on the result of Haig's attack, they both emphasise the loss of morale however source J is very positive about Haig's actions, the source shows that Haig's methods were working whereas source I is highly negative about Haig's actions. I feel that the two sources disagree more on the result of Haig's attack as one is positive and another is negative about the result of the attack however they agree on the fact there was a heavy loss of morale in the allied forces. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    Some found the conditions worse than they were at home. "I don't think I had a bath the whole time I was there. And I don't remember having my hair washed once." Nicola Harrison an evacuee talks about her experiences during evacuation taken from a History textbook on evacuation.

  2. Haig in sources

    even if the tommies did get across no mans land they would be held up by the barbed wire but not the machine gum fire as they would have been destroyed by the bombardment, and would not of been shot down and not as many deaths.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    many of us were quite familiar with origins of milk. Quite definitely, middle and upper class children were also evacuated in 1939, a frequently overlooked fact. However, Source F is quite unreliable. The very gender of the interviewee is undisclosed, and the lack of such basic information can only indicate

  2. The Third Battle of Ypres

    He seemed to be an incurable optimist who was quite incapable of learning from his recent experiences on the Somme! The weather Flanders was notorious for wet weather that usually started in the late autumn and the plan was for the attack to start in July, after the successful but limited Battle of Messines in June.

  1. The Battle of Passchendaele

    He needed another important victory on the way to the coast that would lift the morale of both the army and the government and civilians back in Britain. Passchendaele was in effect what Haig saw as another Somme or Verdun to drive back the Germans in victory.

  2. How far to sources G and H agree about the chances of success for ...

    And even though the battle went on for so long they still managed to achieve there primary objective, which was to Protect Petain and his French army from any serious attacks.

  1. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    The number of children in the photograph is only a fraction of that figure but it does illustrate what was happening in other cities across the country and the photograph is therefore more than likely an accurate interpretation of evacuation.

  2. 'Evacuation was a great success' - Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? ...

    Sources D and H deal with the stereotyping of evacuees. 'A traditional picture of evacuees emerged which suggested that all were infested with lice and disease, had atrocious manners, constantly wet the bed and were likely to commit any number of crimes.'(The Evacuation - The True Story, Martin Parsons and Penny Starns).

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work