• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources agree or disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971? Explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Q5: Do these sources agree or disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971? Explain your answer. These sources both agree and disagree in their verdicts on the result of Haig's attack at Ypres in 1971 however there are more differences than similarities. The sources are both written by Historians and at the same time so their verdicts are going to be based on many different views as highlighted by source I 'The Myriad Faces of War' therefor their verdicts have many similarities. Sources I and J both contain several similarities they both largely emphasise the fact that the morale of the troops was low 'severe fighting, was having a bad effect on morale of everyone concerned.' This was due to the lack of success; between July and November only four miles were gained. ...read more.

Middle

This is similar to source J in that Warner feels that Haig's persistence was not justified, Haig was willing to sacrifice many men to eventually win the war. Source J is titled 'passchendaele' this source is directed directly at passchendaele where as Source I is based upon the many different views of war. Source J writes about General Von Kuhl, a German historian said 'the Flanders battle wore down the German strength to a degree which damage could not be repaired.' It also says that Haig was right in his judgement to continue with attrition. This is far more positive than Source I about the result of Haig's attack as it shows that it was not just the British morale which was low but also the German's 'Against the weight of the enemy's material, the troops [The Germans] no longer displayed their old stubbornness.' ...read more.

Conclusion

to the sacrifice' Both sources open with a moderately positive start 'Haig's great effort' and 'The Australian historian is scrupulously fair,' they both agree on that morale was low. The British were holding Ypres as a symbol of morale and propaganda. They should have retreated behind the natural defence of the canal earlier to massively reduce casualties, however they only did this in 1918. The two sources both agree and disagree on the result of Haig's attack, they both emphasise the loss of morale however source J is very positive about Haig's actions, the source shows that Haig's methods were working whereas source I is highly negative about Haig's actions. I feel that the two sources disagree more on the result of Haig's attack as one is positive and another is negative about the result of the attack however they agree on the fact there was a heavy loss of morale in the allied forces. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. 'Evacuation was a great success' - Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? ...

    There could be a number of reasons for this. For example, the interviewer could have been asking what these people thought were the failures of evacuation. However, it is not impossible that all three did have bad experiences. 'There was no typical evacuation experience' (The Evacuation - The True Story,

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    This was because of the pre-evacuation rehearsals. Teachers, students, and some mothers had practised the journey to the train station in the summer term of 1939, as portrayed in Source B. The relevant aspects of Source B are discussed in question 1, but the main thing about the source is

  1. The Battle of Passchendaele

    He needed another important victory on the way to the coast that would lift the morale of both the army and the government and civilians back in Britain. Passchendaele was in effect what Haig saw as another Somme or Verdun to drive back the Germans in victory.

  2. Study Sources I & J. To what extent do the two maps in ...

    All of the sources agree about the above facts but they portray them in a different way because they are very different sources. But because of this so of the sources can show things that the over sources can. For instance the maps can show the terrain much better than

  1. How far to sources G and H agree about the chances of success for ...

    And even though the battle went on for so long they still managed to achieve there primary objective, which was to Protect Petain and his French army from any serious attacks.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation?

    Furthermore, the motive of the photograph needs to be examined. It is very probable that the government took the picture and did it to raise the support and publicity for evacuation making this propaganda. If this were the case the government would aim to make evacuation look good meaning they wouldn't show an accurate depiction of evacuation.

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    The source shows a varied opinion because the father says some villagers considered sending their children and then changed their mind. Many families did not want to send their children to an unknown family in an unknown destination. Having said that Source I only shows one point of view out

  2. "Evacuation was a great success." Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain ...

    The number of children in the photograph is only a fraction of that figure but it does illustrate what was happening in other cities across the country and the photograph is therefore more than likely an accurate interpretation of evacuation.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work