• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 1. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? (8) A French cartoonist published source A so the source has to be questioned about its reliability as the view could possibly be bias. The caption quotes "Visit the USSR, see the pyramids." This is a cynical and ironic cartoon source. The pyramids of skulls represent the millions of peasants, kulaks and victims of Stalin's purges of 1934 who were killed. Stalin looks quite evil in the cartoon with his squinted eyes and looks quite proud with his friendly guiding hand to show the on-looker his "achievements" of the deaths of many quite innocent civilians. This source gives a bad impression of Stalin and makes it different from the other two sources. Source B is similar to source A as they were both published in the 1930s but are different because it is published by the soviets themselves and hence could be used as propaganda and even part of 'cult of personality' in which Stalin is made out to be a god-like figure. ...read more.

Middle

Overall my conclusion is that source B and C are similar to each other but they are different to source A. The sources give similar and different views of Stalin. They are all similar to each other in the way that they are all visual but different as source A portrays a pessimistic impression whilst source B and C are optimistic impressions of the Russian leader. Question 2. Does this source provide any useful information about Stalin? (9) This source tells me almost nothing useful about Stalin. This is unreliable as it was written by Stalin himself and was probably used for propaganda. The impression that Stalin is trying to depict is that he cares about people saying, "I told them off for having more concern for animals than for men." He is shown as a caring leader when all he cares about is power and how he is determined to keep it. This is not an accurate piece of information because it gives a positive attitude about Stalin and I know for a fact that he didn't care about people because there was an estimated 13 million kulaks ...read more.

Conclusion

It is if to say that Stalin would never do anything like that even though we have the knowledge to show that he would and has taken advantage of his people and treated the brutally and maliciously. Stalin ruled Russia through fear and force and not from being a successful and good leader. The citizens of Russia were afraid of Stalin and would do anything to keep their lives. Consequences of the purges tell me that many peasants, kulaks and communist party members were shot. 20 million Russians had been transported to labor camps and made to work in horrendous working conditions and very harsh hours. Over 90% of the soviet army generals were removed from their positions and people lived in dear in their homes, work places and even in the streets. This knowledge goes against what the source is telling me the reader, and is not useful at all if I was to be looking for reliable and trustworthy information. This source is almost certainly only for propaganda purposes and not a dependable source of knowledge about Joseph Stalin. Question 3. Which of these two sources is the most reliable? (10) ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. These three sources do not all give the same impression of Stalin. Source A ...

    Question 3 Source E is a speech by a writer to the congress of Soviets in 1935. The speech was published in Pravda, the paper of the communist party. The speech praises Stalin, but to an extent where it seems like it's sarcastic.

  2. Source A comes from a cartoon published in Paris in the 1930s. It shows ...

    to win over Eastern Europe and to build a positive image in a war weary USSR. It explains his disgust to how men treated each other. He is disgusted at the lack of concern they show their fellow men. Ironically, Stalin then says that he told them off for not having respect for a human life.

  1. Stalin Sources Questions

    In Source E we are exposed to a man who is fervently in support of Stalin. From the source we can see that this Russian man perceives Stalin as the "god-like" figure of Russian life. The source was written in 1935.

  2. Source related questions on Joseph Stalin

    Although Stalin was a very lazy leader, he was very clever in the way he did things. Stalin used his position as secretary general (before he became leader) to appoint people in party positions who would support him. To add to that, Stalin stopped the publication of Lenin's will, in which he said that Stalin was 'rude'.

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    Explain your answer. From my point of view Source D doesn�t provides us real evidence which proves how was really Stalin like, although people maked up their own opinions. The impression I get from this Source is that Stalin was a hypocritical man.

  2. Do these sources give similar or different impressions of Stalin? Explain your answer with ...

    Some people saw him as a saviour, some as a monster. 2. Study Source D. Does this source provide any useful evidence about Stalin? Explain your answer. This source is a personal account from Stalin, written in 1945. This source is useful because it allows us to be aware of

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    the Tsar is supposed to have been shot", "there is no real evidence as to who or how many victims there were" and "a train left Ekaterinburg and it is believed that the surviving members of the royal family were in it".

  2. What happened to the Romanov Family? - Sources A and B give similar accounts. ...

    In sources A and B the text is maintained as very informative throughout, with little discussed of the minutiae of how the Romanovs were killed, and instead focusing on the more obvious points of the disappearance of the Tsar. Finer details given in C such as: 'The fatty matter in the corpses ran out and mixed in with the soil.'

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work