• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question F Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable? In the 1910's, a lot more pressure was put on the American Government to ban alcohol. Posters and protesting marches were very common throughout the 1910's. Finally in 1920, the prohibition law was passed this meant the making, selling and transporting of alcohol was banned. I think Prohibition was bound to fail as so many people disliked as it went on, and from then on you knew that it was going to fail due to the lack of public support. Prohibition actually caused a lot more crime, which has been highlighted in the other sources (A, B, E etc) and made drinking matters worse throughout the 1920's. I have studied 10 sources on prohibition and most of them suggest that prohibition be bound to fail than succeed. Such as in the 2nd Paragraph on Source A, which says that no other law had produced so much crime and had gone against the 'desires of so many Americans'. ...read more.

Middle

Source H shows the number of arrests from the effects of alcohol; this figure has also increased over the years in Philadelphia, from the time period of 1920-1925. This means that it was most probably the same in other cites. This fact here is again backed up with Sources A, B and E. Sources I and J again show the downfall of prohibition. As Source I suggests that a lot of important men who were involved with prohibition took bribes i.e. Politician, Police Officer, Prohibition Agent. Source I show a line of important men offering there hands out for a bribe. The picture in Source I supports what the policeman says in Source J. As he says that where he patrolled, there was a saloon and the keeper of this saloon would give a bottle of beer to him, anytime he walked in there. This was to make sure he turned a 'blind eye'. He was also paid $75 to keep his mouth shut about this saloon. ...read more.

Conclusion

But some of these sources would have been biased especially Source F as it was written by a Prohibition Commissioner and so would of not suggested that Prohibition could of would of failed. Sources G and H did not tell us the whole facts either, so this meant the statistics of other cities and of other beverages might of worse or better. I conclude that Prohibition was bound to fail after it caused so many problems throughout the USA. That it actually made matters worse rather than better which it was supposed to do. Even the best citizens began to break the law, which shows how much of a failure prohibition actually was. People did not take this law serious enough and this led to Gangsters taking over cities. It also caused a huge amount of corruption and crime throughout the US society at this time. Prohibition lost its support rapidly after becoming a law, it then lost it's respect from other people and after this it was totally finished. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    The bottle was there and you were supposed to drink it'. It also explains how they made law enforcers accept bribes 'He handed me an envelope, I took it and he was gone'. The money was there and the law enforcers were just meant to take it.

  2. Why did prohibition fail? - Gangsters, Widespread illegal drinking, lack of support, impossibility of ...

    quite a dramatic increase, as much alcohol was consumed that wasn't seized. Before Prohibition there were approximately 15,000 legal saloons in New York and by 1932 there were about 32,000 speakeasies in the city - so called because customers had to speak quietly so they were not discovered.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Therefore 1500 was nowhere near enough. In putting these two facts together, without actually saying so, I think the writer believes that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. The way he writes about this and the gangsters leads me to believe that because of all the things he is describing he never believed it could succeed after these events.

  2. The USA Was Prohibition bound To Fail?

    that the police and federal government agents are cracking down and preventing alcohol sale but really there is a massive underground business of alcohol, and all the police are doing is be influenced and turning a blind eye on the matter.

  1. (Q1) Describe some of the key features of Americn society in the 1920's?

    Soon gangsters came to control of whole suburbs of the cities and of most of the politicians who ran them. Whilst gangsters bribed most of the politicians (such as the mayor of Chicago), officers and agents, more and more crime began to increase than before.

  2. To what extent was organised crime the main factor that led to the failure ...

    By the mid 1920's I think that the failure was quite conclusive and it was obvious that the majority of the country still drank and were breaking the law. It was the Depression that actually prohibited ordinary citizens from drinking, as many of them lost their jobs and simply could

  1. Was Prohibition bound to fail? - source related study.

    suggests they are willing to take a 'backhander', however Source J suggest the officer tried to carry out his duties but was more or less forced into neglecting his job, 'if you tried to enforce the law they'd put you in a post where there was nothing but weeds'.

  2. The USA: Was prohibition bound to fail?

    The cartoon in source I shows a web of corruption, as people of power who should be taking part in the enforcement of the law are holding their hands out behind them, signifying "taking a back-hander" - a bribe.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work