• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question (f) - Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable? I am going to structure my answer by first saying how each source proves that the failure of prohibition was inevitable, and then I am going to say how each source shows that the failure of prohibition was not inevitable. Source A says how some states in America had tried prohibition before, they tried prohibition in 1917 and it was not successful, this shows how that if it had not succeeded in a few states, then the chance of it succeeding nationwide was slim. It did not work because as the source says, 'for no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans', this is saying how the law was going against what people did on a daily basis, and the law was stopping them doing this, and they thought that this was unacceptable and so they carried no drinking even though it was illegal. ...read more.

Middle

Source F does not have a reason as to why prohibition might fail, as it is all a reason why it would not fail. Sources G and H both do not show that the failure was inevitable as they are only figures from the time of prohibition so therefore cannot be a prediction of prohibition failing, the only thing that these prove is that alcohol had an increase in sales and production when the law was made so therefore more people were drinking so prohibition was failing. Source I shows that prohibition would fail as it shows many of the highest ranked citizens such as; prohibition agents, police officers, politicians, magistrates, party officials and clerks, could be bribed into ignoring people breaking the law, then how could the ordinary people be expected to take the laws seriously Source J shows that the failure of prohibition was inevitable as it was too difficult for an ordinary policeman to not get corrupted so therefore people could get away with drinking easily as the people who were supposed to be upholding the law were turning a blind eye to it. ...read more.

Conclusion

Sources G and H show that prohibition might not have failed as more people were being arrested for drinking and so the police were working harder at enforcing the law. Although this information can also show that more alcohol was being made and therefore the law was not working. Source I does not show that prohibition could have been a success, but from my own knowledge I know that many officials were keen on enforcing prohibition at the very start in 1919. Source J shows that prohibition could have been successful as the policeman does say that he tried to enforce the law, he just found it very hard as there were so many bribes around. In conclusion I feel that although some of the sources show that prohibition could have succeeded the majority of the evidence I collected shows that prohibition was an inevitable failure. This is because everyone was still drinking even when the law was in action. Also nobody believed that it could work and therefore didn't waste their time trying to make it work. David Baines ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    But the source only talks the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and does not mention other possible reasons for the introduction of prohibition. Source C and D are both posters which were published in 1910 and 1915. Both posters showing the bad effects alcohol has on family life.

  2. Does the evidence of source C support the evidence of sources A and B ...

    Source C does not support source B because source C shows men in casual clothes so they were definitely not working. However it may be a Sunday so everyone is resting and they are not working so they are wearing their own clothes.

  1. History - Prohibition

    The caption is 'The saloon is well named "the poor man's club" - it keeps its members and their families always poor. It sends out the message that alcohol damages family life and that once a man starts drinking, there is no way of stopping him, and that alcohol is a social drug.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    One other reason is bribery. As historians we are aware that a lot of people took bribes such as the police and the agents enforcing Prohibition. By 1925 they may have realised that they could get away with it and were therefore taking bribes more often.

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    This is a way of showing that despite America's good intentions of prohibition, the task of trying to eliminate all of the alcohol problems is far too hard for the small force (represented by Uncle Sam) that had been given the job of eliminating the alcohol.

  2. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    The song is full of optimism for the New Deal, 'He's got things in full sway', so for people to sing this they may have been full of hope at the time, showing their confidence in Roosevelt as their new president Both sources are in favour of Roosevelt so it is difficult to tell, which is a better public opinion.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Law enforcers faced impossible tasks to stop those whole was breaking the act, as the number was gradually rising very quickly. What is similar between Source C and D is that no date is given. The historians are presumed to believe it was taken in the prohibition era, so this

  2. Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable?

    Prohibition was turned into a money making scheme by gangsters who saw an opportunity to fill a gap in the market and supply the "public demand" which was part of the criminal boom that evolved. A law that was openly broken by so many would never be taken seriously.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work