• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

Extracts from this document...


Question (f) - Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable? I am going to structure my answer by first saying how each source proves that the failure of prohibition was inevitable, and then I am going to say how each source shows that the failure of prohibition was not inevitable. Source A says how some states in America had tried prohibition before, they tried prohibition in 1917 and it was not successful, this shows how that if it had not succeeded in a few states, then the chance of it succeeding nationwide was slim. It did not work because as the source says, 'for no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans', this is saying how the law was going against what people did on a daily basis, and the law was stopping them doing this, and they thought that this was unacceptable and so they carried no drinking even though it was illegal. ...read more.


Source F does not have a reason as to why prohibition might fail, as it is all a reason why it would not fail. Sources G and H both do not show that the failure was inevitable as they are only figures from the time of prohibition so therefore cannot be a prediction of prohibition failing, the only thing that these prove is that alcohol had an increase in sales and production when the law was made so therefore more people were drinking so prohibition was failing. Source I shows that prohibition would fail as it shows many of the highest ranked citizens such as; prohibition agents, police officers, politicians, magistrates, party officials and clerks, could be bribed into ignoring people breaking the law, then how could the ordinary people be expected to take the laws seriously Source J shows that the failure of prohibition was inevitable as it was too difficult for an ordinary policeman to not get corrupted so therefore people could get away with drinking easily as the people who were supposed to be upholding the law were turning a blind eye to it. ...read more.


Sources G and H show that prohibition might not have failed as more people were being arrested for drinking and so the police were working harder at enforcing the law. Although this information can also show that more alcohol was being made and therefore the law was not working. Source I does not show that prohibition could have been a success, but from my own knowledge I know that many officials were keen on enforcing prohibition at the very start in 1919. Source J shows that prohibition could have been successful as the policeman does say that he tried to enforce the law, he just found it very hard as there were so many bribes around. In conclusion I feel that although some of the sources show that prohibition could have succeeded the majority of the evidence I collected shows that prohibition was an inevitable failure. This is because everyone was still drinking even when the law was in action. Also nobody believed that it could work and therefore didn't waste their time trying to make it work. David Baines ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    But the source only talks the work of the 'Anti-Saloon League' and does not mention other possible reasons for the introduction of prohibition. Source C and D are both posters which were published in 1910 and 1915. Both posters showing the bad effects alcohol has on family life.

  2. History - Prohibition

    But they did have a few things in common: they both had a taste for killing, the 'Chicago typewriter' (a machine gun) and they both came from poor neighbourhoods. As I have mention above, it was impossible to enforce Prohibition because nobody was prepared to obey the law.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Source J is a policeman talking about Chicago in the 1920's. He is explaining about the corruption that went on in the police force and how he was not allowed to enforce the law banning alcohol. He explains in this statement that if he tried to enforce the law he

  2. Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable?

    no respect for the law then not one person would obey that law, making its existence pointless. Source G is a table of statistics showing the activities of federal government agents enforcing prohibition between 1921 to 1929. It shows an increase over the years of the amount of illegal stills

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    Also he was the first commissioner and needed to make a good impression. The date shows that it was the start of prohibition and he has not seen what was to come unlike source F. From the evidence above, my conclusion is that Source E is more reliable as evidence

  2. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    This is a way of showing that despite America's good intentions of prohibition, the task of trying to eliminate all of the alcohol problems is far too hard for the small force (represented by Uncle Sam) that had been given the job of eliminating the alcohol.

  1. Was the failure of prohibition inevitable?

    By the 1928 there were 30,000 speakeasies in just New York all backed by gangsters all making it a violent business. Propaganda was used to make people feel guilty and not drink by using images of children being left poor by a drinking father of a family and the family

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    1930 describes an attempt to round up stills used to make alcahol where they find 130 gallons of alcahol on farm of Senator Sheppard who was the man responsible of proposing prohibition in first place! This showed if the man who introduced prohibition did'nt care, why should anyone else?

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work