• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable?

Extracts from this document...


Do these sources support the view that the failure of prohibition was inevitable? Prohibition was introduced in 1920. It banned the making, selling and transporting of alcohol all across America. The law was repealed in 1933; historians question whether the failure was inevitable. Source A is from an American history book, published in 1973. It tells us about the reasons for introducing prohibition and then the consequences that followed. I feel source A does the support the idea that prohibition was bound to fail as it mentions that "no earlier law had gone against the daily customs, habits and desires of so many Americans" meaning that if so many Americans were against this law then they would join together and oppose it, causing an uproar throughout the country. The fact that it is their daily customs would have angered the people of America as they would see being able to drink alcohol as one of their human rights and if you make a law forbidding that then you would not receive the warmest response. With the law in motion a criminal boom occurred and that was the last thing they needed and was definitely one of the main negative results of prohibition. ...read more.


This shows us that alcohol became more popular over time as more was about. The jump from 414,000 gallons seized to 11,030,000 four years later would also indicate an increase in production, because of these figures it tells us that people did not see the law as an obstacle and merely went around it. In addition it supports source E's claim that drinking had increased during prohibition. Source H is another table of statistics, this time published by the City of Philadelphia Police Department, showing the number of arrest for drinking-related offences, 1920-25. It becomes clear that the amount of alcohol consumed must have soared to create such an increase in a short space of time, going from 14,313 arrests to 45,226 arrests in three years. Source I is a cartoon from the time of prohibition and is titled "The National Gesture". In the cartoon you see a row of men, facing away with their hands out behind their backs. On the back of the men's jackets are written certain job titles all involved in the enforcement of prohibition. This cartoon is meant to raise awareness of the backhanders taken by the law enforcers and as it is a "national gesture" we know that this corruption was widespread throughout the states. ...read more.


Along side the poster is "and our shoes and stockings and food are in the saloon too, and they'll never come out" it again forwards the message that alcohol leads to poverty and neglect as items which are detrimental to living and supporting a family are unattainable as money is wasted on alcohol in the saloon, following the fathers addiction. Source F is an anecdote again however from John F. Kramer, the first prohibition commissioner from 1920. He believes that prohibition will be strictly obeyed throughout the country and has the greatest intentions to make sure that happens although John F. Kramer was not lying this source was written too early on in prohibition for him to see the true results of prohibition, that being not a lot. This source may be misleading to those who have not heard of the consequences of prohibition as John F. Kramer was dead set on the law being followed and had all hopes of its success. In conclusion I believe these sources weigh more towards the view that prohibition was bound to fail as they bring light to the fact that crime had risen throughout the country. Another reason brought up is the lack of law enforcement and corruption throughout the law, without a firm hand there to control the country then all sense would be lost. ?? ?? ?? ?? Laura Hood ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition bound to fail?

    (F) I think that it is fair to say that the majority of the source's view A to J is that the failure of prohibition was inevitable. Prohibition was introduced at a time where there was pressure not to drink, this is because there were groups like the Women's Christian Temperance

  2. Why did prohibition fail? - Gangsters, Widespread illegal drinking, lack of support, impossibility of ...

    Some had stills in their own homes and some visited speakeasies. Convicted offenders against Prohibition were often let off lightly. Average fines were about $130 and even serious offenders were imprisoned for less than six months. Juries and police often let off offenders and one jury foreman told a judge

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Firstly source A reads, 'It created the greatest criminal boom in American history' because Americans felt it was going against their basic rights, and otherwise law abiding citizens felt justified in breaking this law. He writes, 'No earlier law produced such wide spread crime.

  2. Do these sources support the view that the failure of Prohibition was inevitable?

    Drinking became a game for some of the best citizens and if they could not uphold the law then how could ordinary citizens be expected to?

  1. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    He has no reason to be biased.. As he says "I hoped that it would be widely supported by public opinion and the day would soon come when the evil effects of "alcohol would be recognized. I have slowly and reluctantly come to believe that this has not been the result" This shows how he wanted the

  2. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    The source again mentions God and country, and at this time, people believed in their religion, and were afraid that they would not receive God's protection, and that America would be destroyed under the influence of alcohol. This source does not tell us the consequences of prohibition, and doesn't tell us what happened after prohibition.

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    It says that in 1920 there were only 1,520 prohibition agents, who's salaries were only around $1,200 to $2,000, and that by 1930 there were only 2,836 being paid around $2,300 to $2,800. This shows that there were not enough agents being employed, and that those who were, were underpaid.

  2. Was Prohibition bound to Fail

    Rockefeller says that a vast army of lawbreakers has appeared. In a history book it says that, "thousands of illegal distilleries and brewers were in operation throughout the USA." This was a letter written by John D. Rockefeller in 1932, just 1 year before prohibition ended.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work