• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Free essay example:

Sean B.C                                 Question D

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Sources G and H both give evidence that proves prohibition was successful. Although you could say that the evidence may be corrupt or unreliable, because both tables of statistics were published by the law enforcers of America, who wanted to show they were doing their job right.  Source G shows that the federal agents were seizing more stills and spirits each year between 1921 and 1929.  These figures show that the agents must have been really good at their job, because between 1921 and 1925 the gallons of spirits seized, rose from 414,000 to an amazing 11,030,000.  This rise in the number of gallons seized shows us that Prohibition was working.  The amount of illegal stills being seized also rose between, 1921 and 1925 this also supports the idea, that Prohibition was successful.  Although these figures look good, we can see that between 1925 and 1929 the gallons of spirits seized had not risen anywhere near as much as it had in the last four years.  There could be two explanations for this, either the people who made the spirits became better at hiding it or stopped altogether. I know that the figures between 1925 and 1929 do not make sense, because there was a lot of corruption in the police at that time, which could explain the statistics.  I can support this because if you look at source I it says “The national gesture”, which meant that everyone was taking bribes, including the federal agents.

Source H gives us reliable evidence which also shows us that Prohibition was successful, but as well as that it shows us that when the amount of drink people should really be decreasing to show that Prohibition is working it is actually rising.  We can see this if we look at the total number of drunks, drunk and disorderly conduct and drunk drivers as they rose between 1920 and 1925.  We should really see a decrease in the amount of drunkenness.  Source G shows that the amount of alcohol being seized is actually raising, showing that people must not be able to get hold of alcohol.  We can also see that the number of drunk and disorderly are dropping by 1925, this shows us that people are either not drinking which can not be supported or they are being more cautious in choosing where they drink.  Just like source G, source H was also published by law enforces who are trying to show they were enforcing Prohibition.  We can also say that these statistics are corrupt.  The reliable evidence we can see is that the amount of people being arrested is going up.  This shows that the police are doing there job, but that Prohibition is not very successful, otherwise people would not drink alcohol.    

I have come to a conclusion that these two sources do not prove that Prohibition was successful .The evidence shows that Prohibition was being enforced to an extent, but does not prove it was successful.  We can see the amount of illegal stills and gallons of spirits seized are both rising.  This shows that even though the stills are being seized, the people are still getting hold of the alcohol - if they were not, the police would not need to seize the spirits because there would not be any.  The conclusion we can draw from this, is that the police may have fixed these statistics, to show they were enforcing Prohibition properly.  I also know from my own knowledge, that there was a lot of corruption in the police and government.  Bribes to cops were controlled by people, like Al Capone who made Prohibition a big business.  I think due to my analysis and knowledge of Prohibition, these sources don’t prove that Prohibition was successful.  Others may think differently, because they may not be aware of the corruption in the police force at that time.          

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    In Chicago Al Capone ran the city and, it seems the police department. Finally the police officer goes on to explain about an involuntary bribe he once took, when a man just presented him with $75 in the street. Although both sources J and I support one another's claims there is no concrete evidence in either source.

  2. Prohibition 1920 Sources Question

    I don't know who took the photograph, but I do know that it is a primary source, because it was taken during the 1920's. This particular source was taken to show agents for prohibition after a speakeasy. This particular photograph looks very artificial, as it might have been used as

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    This all shows that the task that America was attempting to do was far too hard for the small force assigned to it, and that it was not being helped by the criminals. This source is backing up the views made by the German poster, and so they both support each other.

  2. Prohibition Sources Questions

    It also may be factually inaccurate. However, it can be very detailed and informs reader about common opinions and attitudes. What the 3 sources have in common is that all offer a desperate view of on-goings faced by law enforcers and agents, while prohibition was around.

  1. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    Source F is not as reliable as Source E due to the fact that this is a speech and he is only talking about what the public want to hear. This means he is talking about all the positives and talking about how it will definitely be enforced by using

  2. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Source H also increases, but this shows people being caught committing drunk-related offences. This could show that the police were successfully enforcing Prohibition. However, it could also show that more people are committing crime, as there are more drunk-related offences.

  1. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    New Deal and Moneys is being thrown away as the water represents money and the water leaking shows money is leaking, otherwise being wasted. There is also a taxpayer who is shown as a normal working person who is suffering to help Roosevelt with the New deal, which is not

  2. Study Sources G and H - Do these prove that Prohibition was successful?

    amount of criminal activity kept on growing, the reason that the amount of confiscated alcohol rose was that the percentage chance that a criminal activity was constantly rising so the percentage chance that there was a bust was too high to miss.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work