• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Free essay example:

Sean B.C                                 Question D

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Sources G and H both give evidence that proves prohibition was successful. Although you could say that the evidence may be corrupt or unreliable, because both tables of statistics were published by the law enforcers of America, who wanted to show they were doing their job right.  Source G shows that the federal agents were seizing more stills and spirits each year between 1921 and 1929.  These figures show that the agents must have been really good at their job, because between 1921 and 1925 the gallons of spirits seized, rose from 414,000 to an amazing 11,030,000.  This rise in the number of gallons seized shows us that Prohibition was working.  The amount of illegal stills being seized also rose between, 1921 and 1925 this also supports the idea, that Prohibition was successful.  Although these figures look good, we can see that between 1925 and 1929 the gallons of spirits seized had not risen anywhere near as much as it had in the last four years.  There could be two explanations for this, either the people who made the spirits became better at hiding it or stopped altogether. I know that the figures between 1925 and 1929 do not make sense, because there was a lot of corruption in the police at that time, which could explain the statistics.  I can support this because if you look at source I it says “The national gesture”, which meant that everyone was taking bribes, including the federal agents.

Source H gives us reliable evidence which also shows us that Prohibition was successful, but as well as that it shows us that when the amount of drink people should really be decreasing to show that Prohibition is working it is actually rising.  We can see this if we look at the total number of drunks, drunk and disorderly conduct and drunk drivers as they rose between 1920 and 1925.  We should really see a decrease in the amount of drunkenness.  Source G shows that the amount of alcohol being seized is actually raising, showing that people must not be able to get hold of alcohol.  We can also see that the number of drunk and disorderly are dropping by 1925, this shows us that people are either not drinking which can not be supported or they are being more cautious in choosing where they drink.  Just like source G, source H was also published by law enforces who are trying to show they were enforcing Prohibition.  We can also say that these statistics are corrupt.  The reliable evidence we can see is that the amount of people being arrested is going up.  This shows that the police are doing there job, but that Prohibition is not very successful, otherwise people would not drink alcohol.    

I have come to a conclusion that these two sources do not prove that Prohibition was successful .The evidence shows that Prohibition was being enforced to an extent, but does not prove it was successful.  We can see the amount of illegal stills and gallons of spirits seized are both rising.  This shows that even though the stills are being seized, the people are still getting hold of the alcohol - if they were not, the police would not need to seize the spirits because there would not be any.  The conclusion we can draw from this, is that the police may have fixed these statistics, to show they were enforcing Prohibition properly.  I also know from my own knowledge, that there was a lot of corruption in the police and government.  Bribes to cops were controlled by people, like Al Capone who made Prohibition a big business.  I think due to my analysis and knowledge of Prohibition, these sources don’t prove that Prohibition was successful.  Others may think differently, because they may not be aware of the corruption in the police force at that time.          

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Study sources C and D Were the artists of these two posters for ...

    Firstly, Source I depicts the corruption within the government. There are seven people standing in a row who are the most important people that are meant to be enforcing Prohibition. But, they all have hands behind their back which shows that they were corrupt and were bribed.

  2. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    It is fair to conclude that as the new law increased crime, so did the police action.

  1. Study Sources G and H - Do these prove that Prohibition was successful?

    The source only shows that the numbers where made by the Police Department in the City but does not show for what reason the statistics where made. The table holds information about th amount of people that were drunk, drunk and disorderly conduct, drunk drivers and the total of all these figures.

  2. Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    It could also be pointed out that the police were slacking hugely in the area of drunk drivers, because these figures are so much lower than the others. But of course the explanation for this is most likely that there were hardly any drunk drivers to catch anyway, because there were not many cars in those days.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    However the families need the money for food and clothing, but the men spend it in the saloon so the family has to go without. The more they drink, the more they want and the more money they spend. At the bottom of the poster it says, "slaves of the saloon", meaning the men are unable to break the habit.

  2. Prohibition Sources Question.

    This misses out a lot of information about prohibition because we know that there were many reasons why the country became "dry" and not just patriotism. This source has no need in being unreliable it is only the fact that is general and simplistic that would make the source unreliable to use as information to back up an argument.

  1. America: Prohibition Sources Question

    Source C states that another reason for campaigning for prohibition was the low efficiency of workers who were addicted to alcohol. This was mainly supported by the more powerful businessmen and factory owners, who were concerned that their employees were not working as hard as they could.

  2. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    to gain more enemies for Roosevelt and make him loose some voters through propaganda. The photo may have also been taken from a wealthy person who has not benefited from the New Deal, but are loosing out. The photo basically symbolises that not everyone has benefited from the New Deal and black are being treated differently.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work