• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - (d) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources G and H. Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful? Sources G and H are both tables of statistics from the 1920's. There are two different ways of interpreting Source G, and it all depends on assumption. Source G shows that over the period of 1921 to 1929 the number of illegal stills seized and gallons of spirits seized increased considerably. Therefore, this could mean that the police were improving their efficiency and catching more criminals. This would seem to prove that Prohibition was successful - but only if we are assuming that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit were either staying relatively the same or decreasing. However, the major problem with these statistics is that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit that there were altogether is unknown. In other words, it is possible that the number of criminals were rapidly increasing over the years, and in fact the police were not catching anywhere near as many of them as they should have been to be successful. ...read more.

Middle

Ignoring this exception, and assuming that the number of drunks at any one time was staying approximately the same, Source H is proving that the police were doing a successful job in enforcing Prohibition. We can see this because over time the police were arresting more and more drunks. However, if we were to assume that the number of drunks were increasing over time, then it is impossible to say how well the police were doing, because we do not know how many people were drunk every year in comparison to how many people were getting caught. Therefore, the success rate is impossible to judge. Focussing on the exceptional figure previously mentioned, it could be argued that the drunks were learning their lesson and therefore there were less drunks to be caught altogether, in which case Prohibition had been a success in that area. But it could also be argued that the police were slacking, and they were simply not taking as much notice of the drunks as they had done before. ...read more.

Conclusion

I have been assuming that they are not, meaning the figures show totally new amounts for each year, but if they are cumulative, then that could entirely change the extent of the success of Prohibition. A final consideration to make for these sources is that they were produced by the police. The purpose of these statistics was therefore very likely to be to prove to the public what a good job the police were doing in enforcing Prohibition. This would suggest that, although statistics are one of the most reliable sources of evidence, in this case it is possible that they were altered for impressionable reasons (i.e. they wanted to make the public believe that the enforcement of Prohibition was succeeding whether it was or not). In conclusion, Sources G and H cannot be "proving" the success of Prohibition. There are different arguments for both sources and we simply cannot judge the rate or extent of success without knowing the total amounts, or knowing for certain that the police didn't alter any of the figures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    In Source H, these statistics could have just been typical for one police force and not others, as Philadelphia could have been a city where Prohibition was just simply not working. Therefore, this statistic could have been reflection one part of Prohibition, not all.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    The 'behind the back' attitude is also demonstrated by the statement "He handed me an envelope, I took it and he was gone". It shows how quickly they had to do it and that they had to do it without anyone else seeing it as it is done in another

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    Both posters were designed to appeal to people's caring, sensitive nature. Both posters could have been published by a number of people, for example the Anti-Saloon League, the Women's Christian Temperance Union or other Christian/Temperance movements. From research I have done into Prohibition, I am aware that the Anti-Saloon League issued the poster in source D.

  2. America In 1920’s Sources Coursework

    In my opinion sources A, C (3), and D (4) are fairly reliable, because they are either straight facts or secondary sources. Whereas D (1) and (2) are both primary and less reliable sources, D (1) is only a photograph, but it's not clear what it's stating and only covers "flappers appearance".

  1. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    The photo is showing that Roosevelt had broken a promise by saying everyone benefits equally and in addition shows of him screening signs of racism. The Source is definitely against Roosevelt through propaganda, politically and also perhaps through racism. 4)

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    2. The message in Source C is one clearly saying that alcohol is beating the legislation of prohibition and the American attempt to prohibit the sale of alcohol. In the background the devil represents the evil alcoholic trade continuously pouring more and more bottles onto the pile.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    The bottom quotation is "paying his dues" which means that alcahol has become more like paying your weekly taxes than a drink you enjoy with your freinds. Alcahol was seen as a homewrecker, which caused devestation, misery and poverty to the families.

  2. Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Also the high increase of incidents of drunk driving may mean the police were accomplishing more and were doing their best. But then there are lots of reasons why it proves Prohibition was unsuccessful such as the majority of drink related crimes increased: Drunk increased from 14,313 in 1920 to

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work