• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - (d) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources G and H. Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful? Sources G and H are both tables of statistics from the 1920's. There are two different ways of interpreting Source G, and it all depends on assumption. Source G shows that over the period of 1921 to 1929 the number of illegal stills seized and gallons of spirits seized increased considerably. Therefore, this could mean that the police were improving their efficiency and catching more criminals. This would seem to prove that Prohibition was successful - but only if we are assuming that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit were either staying relatively the same or decreasing. However, the major problem with these statistics is that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit that there were altogether is unknown. In other words, it is possible that the number of criminals were rapidly increasing over the years, and in fact the police were not catching anywhere near as many of them as they should have been to be successful. ...read more.

Middle

Ignoring this exception, and assuming that the number of drunks at any one time was staying approximately the same, Source H is proving that the police were doing a successful job in enforcing Prohibition. We can see this because over time the police were arresting more and more drunks. However, if we were to assume that the number of drunks were increasing over time, then it is impossible to say how well the police were doing, because we do not know how many people were drunk every year in comparison to how many people were getting caught. Therefore, the success rate is impossible to judge. Focussing on the exceptional figure previously mentioned, it could be argued that the drunks were learning their lesson and therefore there were less drunks to be caught altogether, in which case Prohibition had been a success in that area. But it could also be argued that the police were slacking, and they were simply not taking as much notice of the drunks as they had done before. ...read more.

Conclusion

I have been assuming that they are not, meaning the figures show totally new amounts for each year, but if they are cumulative, then that could entirely change the extent of the success of Prohibition. A final consideration to make for these sources is that they were produced by the police. The purpose of these statistics was therefore very likely to be to prove to the public what a good job the police were doing in enforcing Prohibition. This would suggest that, although statistics are one of the most reliable sources of evidence, in this case it is possible that they were altered for impressionable reasons (i.e. they wanted to make the public believe that the enforcement of Prohibition was succeeding whether it was or not). In conclusion, Sources G and H cannot be "proving" the success of Prohibition. There are different arguments for both sources and we simply cannot judge the rate or extent of success without knowing the total amounts, or knowing for certain that the police didn't alter any of the figures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    sentence is finished with, "And our shoes and stockings and food are in the saloon too, and they'll never come out." They do not mean this literally. The caption means that the money this family needs to buy clothes, shoes and food is being spent inside the saloon, so they will have to go without.

  2. History depth study coursework-USA 1919-1945.

    It shows that Prohibition was inevitable because of the attitude of the people ha changed. The gangsters who started the trade were unlikely to want it to stop as people would want the alcohol and would pay extortionate amount of money just to get it.

  1. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    Source D's explanation of low salaries allow us to infer agents were liable to corruption and there is no way we could gather this from Source C. The many figures presented in Source E offers evidence in support of Source C's suggestion that American authorities were utterly overwhelmed by the problem.

  2. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    In Source H, these statistics could have just been typical for one police force and not others, as Philadelphia could have been a city where Prohibition was just simply not working. Therefore, this statistic could have been reflection one part of Prohibition, not all.

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    The advantage of this form of sources is that it provides the appearance of historical scenes and it can be extremely accurate and detailed providers of information about the people and event. The disadvantage of these two sources are that the camera isn't correct, the photos can easily be tampared with.

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    The child wants to go inside but he is too young and can't. He mother also does not want the child to go in and see his daddy drunk. The sentence that finishes of the title is using the same method as source C.

  1. Free essay

    Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    I can support this because if you look at source I it says "The national gesture", which meant that everyone was taking bribes, including the federal agents.

  2. To what extent can it be argued that the issuing of the Emancipation proclamation ...

    'most of them seemed to agree with Douglass that the proclamation had, indeed, changed everything, even if the proclamation did not free every single slave'3 'it was a good beginning, the most significant step that had been taken in a generation of crusading'4.Iit is clear to see that the proclamation

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work