• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History Coursework - (d) Koral Jackson 10R Study Sources G and H. Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful? Sources G and H are both tables of statistics from the 1920's. There are two different ways of interpreting Source G, and it all depends on assumption. Source G shows that over the period of 1921 to 1929 the number of illegal stills seized and gallons of spirits seized increased considerably. Therefore, this could mean that the police were improving their efficiency and catching more criminals. This would seem to prove that Prohibition was successful - but only if we are assuming that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit were either staying relatively the same or decreasing. However, the major problem with these statistics is that the number of illegal stills and gallons of spirit that there were altogether is unknown. In other words, it is possible that the number of criminals were rapidly increasing over the years, and in fact the police were not catching anywhere near as many of them as they should have been to be successful. ...read more.

Middle

Ignoring this exception, and assuming that the number of drunks at any one time was staying approximately the same, Source H is proving that the police were doing a successful job in enforcing Prohibition. We can see this because over time the police were arresting more and more drunks. However, if we were to assume that the number of drunks were increasing over time, then it is impossible to say how well the police were doing, because we do not know how many people were drunk every year in comparison to how many people were getting caught. Therefore, the success rate is impossible to judge. Focussing on the exceptional figure previously mentioned, it could be argued that the drunks were learning their lesson and therefore there were less drunks to be caught altogether, in which case Prohibition had been a success in that area. But it could also be argued that the police were slacking, and they were simply not taking as much notice of the drunks as they had done before. ...read more.

Conclusion

I have been assuming that they are not, meaning the figures show totally new amounts for each year, but if they are cumulative, then that could entirely change the extent of the success of Prohibition. A final consideration to make for these sources is that they were produced by the police. The purpose of these statistics was therefore very likely to be to prove to the public what a good job the police were doing in enforcing Prohibition. This would suggest that, although statistics are one of the most reliable sources of evidence, in this case it is possible that they were altered for impressionable reasons (i.e. they wanted to make the public believe that the enforcement of Prohibition was succeeding whether it was or not). In conclusion, Sources G and H cannot be "proving" the success of Prohibition. There are different arguments for both sources and we simply cannot judge the rate or extent of success without knowing the total amounts, or knowing for certain that the police didn't alter any of the figures. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE USA 1919-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE USA 1919-1941 essays

  1. Study sources G and H - Do these sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    In Source H, these statistics could have just been typical for one police force and not others, as Philadelphia could have been a city where Prohibition was just simply not working. Therefore, this statistic could have been reflection one part of Prohibition, not all.

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework.

    The poster in source C was published in 1910, five years before the poster in source D and 10 years before Prohibition came into effect across the United States in 1920. Both posters were used to gain support for prohibition and were directed at people from all walks of life.

  1. America In 1920’s Sources Coursework

    Furthermore "the popularity of jazz made many Blacks into high-profile media figures and the black neighbourhood of Harlem in New York became a centre of musical creativity." Lastly Source D (4) another secondary source agrees, saying "The flapper was the most obvious but by no means the only example of the new American cult of youth."

  2. Roosevelt Sources Questions

    The photo is showing that Roosevelt had broken a promise by saying everyone benefits equally and in addition shows of him screening signs of racism. The Source is definitely against Roosevelt through propaganda, politically and also perhaps through racism. 4)

  1. Prohibition Sources Questions

    Gambling was also a big part of alcahol process and bringing violence into many states. The sources provenance prooves that with the title of "Poor man's club-most expensive in the world to belong to", this indicates the poor men of America were so desperate for alcahol to relieve their depression

  2. Prohibition Sources Coursework

    2. The message in Source C is one clearly saying that alcohol is beating the legislation of prohibition and the American attempt to prohibit the sale of alcohol. In the background the devil represents the evil alcoholic trade continuously pouring more and more bottles onto the pile.

  1. Study Sources G and H, Do these two sources prove that Prohibition was successful?

    Also the high increase of incidents of drunk driving may mean the police were accomplishing more and were doing their best. But then there are lots of reasons why it proves Prohibition was unsuccessful such as the majority of drink related crimes increased: Drunk increased from 14,313 in 1920 to

  2. Prohibition. Sources A and B are from the same time period, the 1970s. This ...

    man is handing over his weeks wages for drink and not supporting his family. The picture in the bottom right emphasises this. It shows a woman and her little child with hardly any food to eat, as the money is being spent by the father on drink.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work