• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that it was the actions of the Army that destroyed the Tsardom in 1917?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree that it was the actions of the Army that destroyed the Tsardom in 1917? In 1917, Russia faced drastic changes after Nicholas II decided to abdicate for himself and his son Alexi. This decision as made after the Romanov dynasty had lost support and faced great hardship in the last few years. The loss of support was due to many factors. For example; World War One and its consequences both on the home and fighting front; rapid proletariat growth in cities causing mutinies; the actions of individuals, for example: Rasputin; and also the actions of the army. This can be argued as the most pressing factor on the disturbance of the Tsardom. All of these causes played an important role in Nicholas II position and ultimately they led to the downfall of the Romanov family. The army's actions can be thought to be one of the most important causes in the Tsardom downfall. The army generals had a huge over Nicholas II position and advised him throughout his reign on important military decisions. ...read more.


The proletariats were a main factor in the destruction of tsardom. Many peasants left the country after Stolypins failed attempts of land reform, to join the working force in industrial cities, which made the great spurt became ever more successful. But as industry was improving the conditions for the workers were decreasing and many became discontent leading to a second revolution in 1917 once again starting at the Putilov Factory in Saint Petersburg. These demonstrations were exacerbated by the war where many of the proletariats faced great hardship and discontent from starvation and also inflation. Therefore low morale was present in the cities and many turned against Nicholas blaming him for the problems that were present. The peasants in the rural areas were also growing increasingly annoyed with the tsardom after the lack of influence the reforms had on agriculture especially Stolypins attempt, they all still held bitterness from the emancipation of the serfs as well. The war also had a huge effect on the rural peasants as the were suffering from starvation as all of their food products were being sent out to the Army and if they did have food then it would be rotten due to the villages being so remote. ...read more.


Even though Rasputin was 'more of a symptom of decay of the Tsarist system than a cause of it' he still had a head on affect to the downfall as he portrayed the weakness of Nicholas and his family. The World War was a prominent cause in pushing many people to realise their hardship and so, eventually reject the Tsar. It highlighted the poor state of Russia and its rule and emphasised the point that before other countries were sorted out it should sort it own problems to create stability. In conclusion, there cannot be one most important in the downfall of the Tsardom as it involved many different classes each voicing different opinions. However, the army's action seem to be a significant cause as the Tsar relied heavily on them, but it was the opinions of other groups and the fact of the war which tainted the opinions of the army and so acting as a catalyst for their actions which eventually led to loss of support towards Nicholas and hence his abdication. Consequently, it can be said that the Army's actions was not the main cause in the abdication of Nicholas but, was an essential contributing factor. ?? ?? ?? ?? Stacey Griffin 13HF - 1 - ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    The Tsar's armies were away fighting Germany on the western borders leaving no or little methods of control within the towns and cities. Source A, although slightly bent from the truth gives us a brief idea of what had irrupted in Petrograd.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    In source D, it says "How glad I am that I need no longer attend to those tiresome interviews and sign those everlasting documents!" This shows that the Tsar could have tended to Russia's problems, but he couldn't be bothered, and would rather "Read, walk, and spend time with [his] children".

  1. What Were Stolypin's Reforms Trying To Achieve? How Successful Were They?

    Nevertheless this was not the main reason way this failed in order for this to work he needed to break the power of the Mir which it didn't, in fact by 1917, 95% had return to it. This was because many peasants were against leaving the commune and those who weren't were afraid to go against the commune.

  2. Assess the extent to which the political incompetence of Nicholas II led to the ...

    Even though the Tsar was not in the winter palace at the time and hadn't ordered the troops to fire the popular image of the Tsar was eroded as was the structure of tsarist regime (http://www.planetpapers.com/Assets/788.php). The liberals became worried about the deterioration of the nation.

  1. What happened to the Romanov family? - Study Sources A and B. Sources A ...

    or realised that the investigators were Whites who would persecute anyone who helped to kill their leader whereas Medvedev would have twisted the truth in Source D to save his persecution from the Whites which may well have been in the form of his execution.

  2. Were Was it the length of World War I that destroyed the Reign of ...

    Evidently, leaving Petrograd was a terrible mistake made by Nicholas as he really should have been trying to sort out the homefront, rather than worrying so much about the warfront. In his absence the Tsarina, Alexandra, was left in charge of the country, to the great disapproval of the whole country- politicians, aristocracy and peasants alike.

  1. What Happened To the Romanov Family?

    In source D it says that Medvedev was probably tortured by Whites and that he gave himself up in strange circumstances. This could have easily had an affect on what he was saying, because although he was a red, he may have been telling the whites what they wanted to hear, i.e.

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    It has to be systematically prepared over years and decades. This lesson has been demonstrated by the whole of history, especially the history of the twentieth century. Rosa Luxemburg, that great revolutionary and martyr of the working class, always emphasised the revolutionary initiative of the masses as the motor force of revolution.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work