• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that the Treaty of versailles was unfair to Germany?

Extracts from this document...


Four years of painful fighting and tragic loss for both sides had ceased, but how do the Allies punish Germany? On the twenty-eighth of June 1919, representatives from thirty-two countries met in a grand palace in Versailles forty-two miles outside of Paris for a five-month conference to decide how to punish Germany and her allies. A treaty was formed. It consisted of seventy-five thousand words, four hundred and forty clauses and two hundred pages, which created the Treaty Of Versailles. The newly formed Republic of Germany had little or no say in the negotiations, and for 2 months refused to sign. Only the threat of military action and occupation made her reluctantly agree to sign it. But was it fair on Germany? Did they deserve the terms of the treaty? ...read more.


Also, the 'War-Guilt Clause' was inflicted on Germany. This meant under Article 231, 'Germany accepts responsibility for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied governments have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany.' For me, this is the most unfair of all the terms of the treaty because it is wrong to assume that Germany did cause and start the war. To work out what or who did, you have to consider what events took place preceding the war. You also have to think about 'Which spark lit the bonfire?' Was it the shooting in Sarajevo? In my opinion it was. If Franz Ferdinand and his wife had not been shoot in Bosnia then Austria wouldn't had needed Germany to help them. ...read more.


Also, the amount of land that was taken away from Germany was too severe and was just and invitation for other countries to try and take advantage. In addition, not letting Germany join the newly formed League of nations was stupid because the point of the treaty was to prevent another war happening and refusing them admission was just souring Germany further. Of the Big three that attended the conference I feel that Georges Clemenceau got what he wanted most of all and that Woodrow Wilson got least what he wanted. This is because Clemenceau wanted bitter revenge on Germany for the damage they caused. I feel he got this because the terms of the treaty were unfair on Germany. But Wilson just wanted world peace because he didn't want another war ever again. Unfortunately, not everybody shared these views because if they did then World War Two wouldn't have taken place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    there was a lot of arguments within Germany as to whether they should agree to it but the Germans had their arms twisted and there was not much else they could do, but agree. This was a dangerous situation because the Germans were extremely angered about this decision and it could lead to problems in the future.

  2. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    (Mein Kampf). Hitler formulated an idea named "Lebensraum", which in English means living space. In this policy, Hitler hoped to spread German frontiers, in order to make Germany more self-sufficient and spacious. This idea alone meant taking over other countries which were sovereign in their own right.

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    It was outside factors such as the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression which led on from the Crash and this hugely crippled the German economy along with the reparation payments and this meant that the American funded plans such as the Dawes plan was pulled out of Germany

  2. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    The German's armed forces (as previously discussed) were limited, and Germany was made to accept war guilt. France partially achieved some form of reparation. They demanded $200billion, but this was too much; as the Reparations committee decided. France wanted the Rhineland, rich in economical value, to be separated from Germany.

  1. The Treaty Of Versailles: Unfair?

    One of these ways was militarily. The German army was cut drastically to even less then it was before the war. The army was cut to only 100,000 and Germany could not own any armoured vehicles, submarines or any aircraft.

  2. The Antarctic Treaty: When and why was the treaty formed?

    place a dispute settlement procedure and a mechanism by which the Treaty can be modified; * prohibits nuclear explosions and the disposal of radioactive waste; * provides for inspection by observers, designated by any party, of ships, stations and equipment in Antarctica to ensure the observance of, and compliance with,

  1. Was the Treaty of Versailles Just?

    He also demanded that the wartime alliance between the Allies be continued. This differed significantly from the attitude and vision of President Wilson, who had only become involved with the war when it was absolutely unavoidable. Wilson was an idealist and wanted to let Germany off lightly.

  2. To what extent was the treaty of Versailles unfair

    it to the sea - and consequently separated Eastern Prussia from the rest of Germany.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work