• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that the Treaty of versailles was unfair to Germany?

Extracts from this document...


Four years of painful fighting and tragic loss for both sides had ceased, but how do the Allies punish Germany? On the twenty-eighth of June 1919, representatives from thirty-two countries met in a grand palace in Versailles forty-two miles outside of Paris for a five-month conference to decide how to punish Germany and her allies. A treaty was formed. It consisted of seventy-five thousand words, four hundred and forty clauses and two hundred pages, which created the Treaty Of Versailles. The newly formed Republic of Germany had little or no say in the negotiations, and for 2 months refused to sign. Only the threat of military action and occupation made her reluctantly agree to sign it. But was it fair on Germany? Did they deserve the terms of the treaty? ...read more.


Also, the 'War-Guilt Clause' was inflicted on Germany. This meant under Article 231, 'Germany accepts responsibility for causing all the loss and damage to which the Allied governments have been subjected as a consequence of the war imposed upon them by the aggression of Germany.' For me, this is the most unfair of all the terms of the treaty because it is wrong to assume that Germany did cause and start the war. To work out what or who did, you have to consider what events took place preceding the war. You also have to think about 'Which spark lit the bonfire?' Was it the shooting in Sarajevo? In my opinion it was. If Franz Ferdinand and his wife had not been shoot in Bosnia then Austria wouldn't had needed Germany to help them. ...read more.


Also, the amount of land that was taken away from Germany was too severe and was just and invitation for other countries to try and take advantage. In addition, not letting Germany join the newly formed League of nations was stupid because the point of the treaty was to prevent another war happening and refusing them admission was just souring Germany further. Of the Big three that attended the conference I feel that Georges Clemenceau got what he wanted most of all and that Woodrow Wilson got least what he wanted. This is because Clemenceau wanted bitter revenge on Germany for the damage they caused. I feel he got this because the terms of the treaty were unfair on Germany. But Wilson just wanted world peace because he didn't want another war ever again. Unfortunately, not everybody shared these views because if they did then World War Two wouldn't have taken place. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    Tens of thousands were jailed and sent to concentration camps, just because they happened to be Jewish religion. Not willing to take on the issue, the Allies were unable to stop the German's from taking over Austria. As Hitler grew bolder, so did his conquests.

  2. Who was most pleased with the Treaty of Versailles. Woodrow Wilson or George Clemenceau?

    However, others thought that this would weaken Germany too much. Eventually compromise was reached where no German soldiers were allowed in the demilitarised zone. Another peace of land up for dispute was the Saarland. France wanted it for itself for it was a coal rich area.

  1. To what extent was the Treaty of Versailles justifiable?

    It was outside factors such as the Wall Street Crash and the Great Depression which led on from the Crash and this hugely crippled the German economy along with the reparation payments and this meant that the American funded plans such as the Dawes plan was pulled out of Germany

  2. Was the Treaty of Versailles unfair to Germany?

    The amount that they were allocated for their army was barely enough to defend their country inside against revolutions let alone if another country decided to attack them. This allocation made the Germans very angry because they were very proud of their army and it meant a lot to them,


    Ruhr to force Germany to pay up: as well as causing chaos at the same time.

  2. The Treaty Of Versailles: Unfair?

    This was to cause great disruption in Germany. Financially Germany was greatly affected. The economy slowed down due to land being taken away and the country with wide spread unemployment so there were fewer taxpayers giving the government money. Coalfields and iron mines were lost which were great parts of

  1. How far do you think that the Treaty of Versailles was unfair on Germany?

    This was then used to justify the reparations. This was unfair as Germany were not the only country to blame for the war (although modern day historians agree that it was mostly Germany?s fault). The Treaty was also unfair as the allies demanded reparations but through The League of Nations (which Germany was excluded from and the US didn?t even join)

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    he did not concern himself with demands for compensation. As, in effect, America had not suffered nearly as much as the European allies and even made money out of the war. This is because while Germany, Britain, France, Russia, etc. were fighting the countries that normally traded with those countries looked to America to supply them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work