• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree that the Versailles Treaty was a damaging treaty for the future of the Weimar Republic

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree that the Versailles Treaty was a damaging treaty for the future of the Weimar Republic? This is an important question to look at because the Treaty of Versailles was heavily influential on Germany's future for the next twenty years. It is important to look at how the different terms within the treaty, and how they affected Germany as a nation and consequently; Europe as a continent. Article 231, which was also known as the War Guilt Clause, was damaging to the pride of many Germans, although this does seem to be fair because of Germany's application of the Schlieffen plan to a situation that was developing hundreds of miles away from French borders in Serbia. (Since the Schlieffen plan involved an immediate assault on France with a strategic aim of taking Paris). The blame cannot entirely be shouldered with Germany as the conflict originated in the Balkans, and Germany was really drawn in by her ally Austria-Hungary. The allies (Britain, USA, France and Italy) really wanted to implement Article 231 in order to justify reparations that they forced Germany to pay. Article 231 can be seen to be damaging because it caused resentment in many Germans towards the treaty, especially the War Guilt Clause, and those who had accepted it; the government of the Weimar Republic. ...read more.


Extremist left wing groups such as the KPD became popular with the working classes who were receiving no pay due to the economic climate. One of the other fast-growing political group was Hitler's National Socialists, this group was fast becoming popular because they stood up against the Treaty of Versailles but now also promising Germans prosperity, full employment and national unity, through ridding Germany of its 'impurities'; such as the Jews. Many people in the German middle classes soon began to believe the Nazi propaganda and many soon became very impressed by it. Therefore, it can be seen that the reparations clauses of the Versailles Treaty were damaging both in the long term, through encouraging support for extremists within Germany, and the short term through causing the massive devaluation of the mark. There were military stipulations in the Treaty of Versailles with the aim of safeguarding France's borders from another German attack, this in the long run, of course, failed. These clauses said that Germany's military should be significantly reduced in terms of size and striking power. More significantly, Germany's army was to be no larger than 100,000 men, conscription was outlawed, tanks and armoured cars were not allowed either. ...read more.


The differences between the allied leaders in terms of what they wanted as an outcome of the Treaty meant that it was neither too harsh nor too lenient, and so sat in the middle rather uselessly. The combination of it being so harsh as to strongly damage the Germans pride in what Hugo Preuss described as 'a shameless blow in the face' yet so lenient that it could rise again and cause the damage it did in World War 2 is proof of its ineffectiveness. The Weimar Republic was with a huge disability through the Versailles Treaty; 'That it did not collapse immediately under the strain is striking proof of the intrinsic vitality of its basic principles; but its implementation and evolution were inevitably fatefully restricted and lamed thereby.' The different stipulations of the Versailles Treaty meant that there would need to be significant change in Germany before it could become a major power once more, an idea thoroughly popular with the majority of Germans. This meant that the Weimar Republic and its government was effectively doomed from the outset. It was perhaps unfortunate that the treaty was not harsh enough that Germany was permanently weakened as George Clemenceau wanted, extremist views such as those of Hitler may then have been dismissed as delusional, and hence, Europe and the World may have been saved from the evils of Nazism. Ben Waite ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Treaty Of versailles

    5 star(s)

    In particular, many people felt that Germans were themselves operating a double standard. This meant that they were being hypocritical with their comments towards the treaty. Their call for a fairer treatment did not square with the harsh way they had treated Russia in the Treaty of Brest-Livtosk in 1918.

  2. How did the Treaty of Versailles contribute to Hitler’s rise to power?

    party since the Weimar government was held in the town of Weimar and not the capital Berlin since it was deemed too politically unstable for them, and Weimar constitution meant that there was a system of proportional representation. This meant that if for example you had 20 votes you got 20 seats.

  1. How satisfied were the Allied Leaders with the Treaty of Versailles?

    One of the main demands by Clemenceau was that he wanted Alsace Lorraine back, as it had been taken by German in 1890 during a previous war. However, Clemenceau was disappointed with the treaty, although harsh military restrictions and a large amount of reparations had been imposed on Germany, he still wanted the treaty to of been harsher.

  2. Germany, 1918-1945 - Treaty of Versailles.

    This proved himself to be a dominant and powerful character for the job-just what Germany needed. This is good as Germany felt humiliated after the First World War and then the Treaty of Versailles and needed someone, like Hitler, to regain Germany's strength and self-control.

  1. Why did the Nazis replace the Weimar Republic?

    ii. racial policy - ensuring that from German society iii. His own popularity - mainly meant that Hitler wanted to see a reduction in unemployment and the careful running of a propaganda campaign to bolster his image. Since these three issues were working well, Hitler had no reason to become involved in day to day administration.

  2. Why did most German's hate the treaty of Versailles?

    One of the main focuses of the treaty was weakening Germany's armed forces. For example: the German Air- Force had to be disbanded, the army was limited to 100,000 soldiers and the navy was restricted too. This may have been seen as an act of cowardice.

  1. Discuss the view that the Versailles treaty created as many problems as it solved.

    As Germany army's had retreated back in to Germany numerous French villages and town's were pillaged and destroyed. Some might say in acting in this way the Germans led themselves into a situation where they should have be able to be punished to the full extent of what the most affected nations saw as fit punishment.

  2. WWII History Revision Notes. How far did the Weimar Republic Recover between 1924-1928.

    worse as prices fell How did the Depression Weaken the Weimar Republic? 1. Unpopular Economic Policies: 1. The Weimar Government did not want to print money and increase Government expenditure (give people jobs so they pay tax etc) because they were afraid of the effects of Hyperinflation in 1923.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work