• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that it was primarily the lack of co-ordination of his opponents that enabled the Tsar to survive the 1905 revolution?

Extracts from this document...


Do you agree with the view that it was primarily the lack of co-ordination of his opponents that enabled the Tsar to survive the 1905 revolution? In 1905 tsarism suffered a dreadful battering, Tsar Nicolas III had to cope with opposition from all sides. The workers and the army were unhappy with their working conditions; they wanted minimum wage and more rights. The peasants wanted more land and the liberals wanted a better political system that was more democratic and gave them more say in how the country was run. He had to contend with numerous strikes, uprisings, assassinations and mutinies. It is surprising, therefore than the Tsar managed to remain in his throne throughout 1905. Lack of co-ordination of his opponents played a large part in ensuring the survival of Tsar during the 1905 revolution. Throughout 1905 there were numerous strikes and uprisings; in January there was a general strike in St Petersburg, paralysing the city. Moscow suffered a damaging national general strike in October and another uprising in December. Many similar events took place throughout 1905, including naval mutinies - such as in Kronstadt or the famous Pokemkin mutiny at Odessa, and the assassination of Grand Duke Sergi, the Tsars uncle. ...read more.


Witte realised that the liberals were a potential danger to the tsarist regime, so he proposed the October Manifesto as a way of 'buying them off.' If they were satisfied then the Tsar could easily control the peasants and workers. Source 1 states the points of the Manifesto, including; 'fundamental civil freedoms will be granted', 'participation in the Duma will be granted', and 'no law can come into pass without its approval by the State Duma'. This was met with great joy from the people of Russia, workers went back to work and the liberals and middle class were placated. Despite this outward display towards democracy Nicolas III had little intention of letting Russia head towards a democratic system. Key quotes in the Manifesto show that the Tsar still intends to place limitations on it; 'Participation in the Duma will be granted to those classes of the population which are at present deprived of voting powers' The phrasing of this quote is very vague, it does not state specifically who will be allowed to participate, but instead leaves it more open to debate. Later the Manifesto states 'We call on all true sons of Russia' this immediately shows that despite Nicolas's new 'democratic' ways he will still inforce racial restrictions. ...read more.


They played no part in orchestrating the revolution so as Source 3 says 'revolution occurred in spite, rather than because of them' and the Tsar was saved from having to control them too. Had Nicolas's opponents united together and co-ordinated their agitation on the regime then Nicolas III would not have survived the 1905 revolution. He would not have been able to control organised, timed uprisings across Russia and indubitably the regime would have fallen. However, lack of organisation on their part was not the only factor that allowed him to remain in control. His advisors were crucial to his survival, Witte presented him with the October Manifesto - another key part in saving his regime. Without the October Manifesto the liberals may have organised the resistance against the Tsar and found a way of removing him from his throne. Stolypin's policy of repression was also vital, it frightened many people out of protesting and the loyalty of the army ensured the Tsar remained in control. Finally the determination of the government to survive helped it to remain in charge, had the government been weak it would have likely collapsed in the first wave of strikes. The lack of co-ordination of the workers, peasants, liberals etc. did primarily save the Tsar, but these other factors contributed. Lorna Harris 12OW ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    The man he chose was Peter Stolypin, a former governor of one of Russia's provinces. He was rather forceful in his tactics used to repress revolution in Russia and if he had lived longer, these tactics would have fully succeeded.

  2. The fall of Tsarism in Russia.

    In this source Rasputin is looking very sinister, as if he has other plans for Tsarism. The source shows Rasputin as a puppeteer, controlling the Tsar and Tsarina. The sheer fact that Rasputin has been drawn larger that the Tsar and Tsarina suggests he is becoming increasingly powerful.

  1. How did the tsar survive the 1905 revolution?

    Factories had no access to raw materials, so they had to lay off workers or shut down. At the beginning of the war people were willing to support the war effort, but when news of defeat arrived they became disgruntled and demanded higher wages, the formation of trade unions and

  2. How did the Tsar survive in 1905?

    Nicholas made as few concessions as possible Witte, the new Chief Minister, advised Nicholas II to make concessions. He eventually agreed and published the October Manifesto. This granted freedom of conscience, speech, meeting and association. He also promised that in future people would not be imprisoned without trial.

  1. 'Given time Stolypin's work might have saved Tsarism'. How far do you agree?

    After the agrarian reforms Stolypin moved on to urban reforms to help save Tsarism. He sought to bring peace to the industrial workplace. Between 1907 and 1912 the number of strikes declined and the industrial workforce relatively subdued this however was not due to Stolypin's reforms.

  2. How and why did the Tsarist regime survive the 1905 revolution?

    At first the people were willing to support the war effort, but when news of defeat arrived they became angry. They demanded higher wages, the formation of trade unions and the abolishment of certain laws. On January 22, 1905, the movement culminated in a march of thousands of industrial workers,

  1. Was the October Revolution inevitable

    This investment from overseas was key in understanding Russia's reluctance towards war. Prior to the October revolution the country was running on low resources and poor moral due to the Russo-Japanese war. Russia had been reluctantly drawn in to fighting against Germany and Austria-Hungary but after the assassination of

  2. Why did 'Bloody Sunday' take place?

    We have suffered but are driven further and further into the abyss of poverty, injustice and ignorance.' This shows to us that the peasants were fed up of being treated like they are just work horses and that it didn't really matter how they were treated.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work