• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that Stalin successfully removed ‘treachery’ and ‘counter-revolution’ in the USSR in the 1930’s?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with the view that Stalin successfully removed 'treachery' and 'counter-revolution' in the USSR in the 1930's? The use of terror became a central part of the soviet regime during the 1930's with the launching of the great terror against prominent party members. A series of show trials were held which saw former leaders of the regime accused and then executed. The purges went beyond former leaders who had fallen out with Stalin, and were extended to include army personnel and middle-ranking party officials. In fact, anyone who found himself or herself labelled as an 'enemy of the people' be them peasants, factory workers, class enemies, even the secret police themselves became a victim of the great purges. Throughout this time, millions were forced into labour camps, executed, tortured, put on trial, died of diseases and starvation or simply 'disappeared'. The justification of all the death and terror that took place was that all these people had committed the crime of being an enemy of the state and were trying to overthrow the revolution. ...read more.

Middle

Collectivisation was the second of Stalin's economic changes and was his answer to the belief that Russia's agriculture was in a terrible state. Stalin felt that Russia should be able to feed itself or at the very least should be providing enough food for the workers in the factories. Collectivisation was a revert back to Lenin's idea of War communism, all farms were to be gathered together to form one massive farm. The larger the farm was, the more food that could be grown and therefore cities and factories could be suitably fed. Without this policy Stalin felt that the five-year plan would not succeed. However collectivisation didn't work, under NEP even the poorest peasants had been given land and now through the sudden revert back to the ideologies of war communism it was all to be taken away from them. Some peasants had worked hard and done well. These richer peasants were called kulak and were especially against the idea of collectivisation, they felt that their had work was being taken advantage of. ...read more.

Conclusion

In some cases a person would be told so many times that they were an enemy of the people that they would start believeing it them self......... Was Stalin's paranoia justified? There was a split within the bolshevik party however stalin had placed all loyal supporters in important positions. And every one was too scared to say anything in case of the consequences. There was a threat of allied invasion during 1920-1921 and during the 1930's they were the only communist country surrounded by other countries who were openly anticommunist. However this does not justify the killing of thousands of innocent peasants who had no contact with capatalist countries. The peasants threat of revolution, they were opposed to collectivisation they burnt cattel and grain.........however at its introduction in 1928 it was referred to as 'voluntary' If anything these purges where more damaging to russia than anything else However Stalin's increasing paranoia and the fact he believed everyone was out to get him led to him killing off many of this loyal supporters within the Bolshevik party ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people.' How ...

    that the West was less likely to get attacked by countries like China. In addition, extravagant projects were carried out to display the might of the new Soviet industrial machine. This was the 'Dnieprostroi Dam' in the eastern USSR, which was for two years the world's largest construction site, and it increased the Soviet electric power output, dramatically.

  2. Stalin and the Five-Year Plans.

    This would help him to appear to be a sociable person and he would appear to be listening to the ideas of the USSR people even if they were ideas like the 'Dnieprostroi Dam' where Stalin didn't approve of the project at first.

  1. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    How far do you agree with this statement? I do not agree with this statement because the war, although important in order for the March Revolution to happen, it was not the main cause. There were other long term and more important causes which I will explain later.

  2. Explain why there was an Industrial Revolution

    In summer they visited new holiday resorts such as Blackpool and Southend. Fresh food could be transported easily, to the benefit of both farmer and townspeople. Railways were also a strong impetus to further industrial growth. One important effect was reduced transport costs of raw materials and manufactured goods.

  1. 'The Five Year Plans brought glory to Stalin and misery to his people' - ...

    Nevertheless, the glorification is by far not the only way or the most important way in which the achievements of Stalin's ambitious agenda could be described. There is sufficient evidence to prove that through Stalin's motivated plan, Russia's heavy and light industries as well as her communication, agriculture and academic system improved drastically to a staggering extent.

  2. How true is it to say that Stalin effectively removed opposition to the exercise ...

    The main difference was the terror in the 1920's was usually applied to obvious opponents of the party; whereas the terror in the 1930's was mainly against members of the party and against people had committed no offences to be considered as opposition.

  1. How and with what results to 1939 did Stalin succeed in asserting his personal ...

    By eradicating his most powerful opposition from the party, Stalin secured his position as leader and gained almost complete control of the Communist regime, which, in time, would lead to the assertion of his personal authority over the USSR. This may be seen as cunning on Stalin's part, but there

  2. The blance sheet for russia.

    Although the Bolshevik Party played a fundamental role in the Revolution, this was not a simple one-way process, but a dialectical one. Lenin pointed out many times that the masses are a hundred times more revolutionary than the most revolutionary party.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work