"Do you agree with the view that the Nazis were able to consolidate their hold on power so easily in the period Jan-March 1933 simply because of the use of terror and intimidation?"

Authors Avatar

Lauren Stevens

“Do you agree with the view that the Nazis were able to consolidate their hold on power so easily in the period Jan-March 1933 simply because of the use of terror and intimidation?”

The Nazis could not have risked using simply terror and intimidation to consolidate their hold on power once Hitler was elected. They had operated with the tactic of the “legal revolution” for the previous ten years and this was what had brought them to government. Reverting back to their original putschist tactics that had failed before would have been a disastrous move now they had obtained some power. In fact being seen to be a revolutionary party would not only have been unsuccessful but would also have caused major damage to their reputation. It would have alienated the middle class voters who had supported the Nazis because they saw them as a way as keeping law and order against a Marxist revolution. It would have also alienated the elites who had helped put Hitler into power by making them believe that he was suddenly out of their control and unlikely to do whatever they wanted.

Join now!

  Hitler wanted to be the head of a Nazi dictatorship but he had to go about it legally. The only way to do this was if Hitler had held a two-thirds majority of Reichstag seats, allowing him to create the desired dictatorship by amending the constitution. He tried to do this by persuading Hindenburg to call fresh elections within 24 hours of him becoming Chancellor.

  Before the election happened in March 1933 the Reichstag Fire broke out which was blamed on the Communists. Hitler was then able to convince Hindenburg of a Communist plot to overthrow the ...

This is a preview of the whole essay