Do you agree with the view that the Nazis were able to consolidate their hold on power so easily in the period Jan-March 1933 simply because of their use of terror and intimidation?

Authors Avatar

Do you agree with the view that the Nazis were able to consolidate their hold on power so easily in the period Jan-March 1933 simply because of their use of terror and intimidation?

I do agree with this view in some ways as the Nazis did use some terror and intimidation, such as the Reichstag fire; however the Nazis did not just use terror and intimidation they also used promises and reassurances to the German people.

        Some methods of terror and intimidation that the Nazis did use to keep their hold on power were on the 27th February Hitler used the Reichstag fire to build up a German hatred of the Communists who he claimed had begun the fire, he also accused them of plotting to overthrow the state.

 On 28th of February Hindenburg issues an emergency decree for the protection of the Nation and the State under which communists, members of the SPD and leaders of the trade unions were put into ‘protective custody’ although this was not a direct act of terror it was a policy for it.

Join now!

Hitler was clever during this time and didn’t always result to violent measures he managed to gain the support of the Centre Party who would agree to support the decree if Hitler promised he would protect the Catholic Church and respect its morals. Here Hitler has gained more support and has a stronger chance of holding onto his power through promises.  

Leading up to the passing of the enabling act Hitler and the Nazis had managed to gain control over most of the German media such as radio and newspapers which he used to rally as much support as ...

This is a preview of the whole essay