• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that the revolution of February 1917 was the unexpected outcome of local upheaval in Petrograd?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Question 5 part b Do you agree with the view that the revolution of February 1917 was the unexpected outcome of local upheaval in Petrograd? I partially agree with the view that the 1917 revolution was due to a local Petrograd rebellion. It is because since the start of WW1 Russia had become more and more ineffective at supplying both the troops at the front line and the citizens at home. This led to animosity and resentment between solders and the working class. Also because the war was going on food and fuel were taking longer to get to Petrograd, only one third of food needed got through while only half of all fuel needs got through. This caused civil unrest and many of the civilian population now began to believe that entering the war was a rushed and rash move on Nicholas's part. The hardships of which the police put down people who complained about the war was also a trigger that turned many moderates against Nicholas. ...read more.

Middle

Source 5 goes on to say that it is hard to pinpoint a decisive blow to the Tsar which forced him to abdicate. The source says that the tsarist regime survived the 1905 revolution by making concessions and Stolypins cunning. The tsar had clearly forgotten about this previous rebellion or he would have thought ahead and made vital concessions where necessary. It would also have helped if the tsar hadn't kept changing the Dumas to just have his supporters in it. This act helped to alienate many moderates who may have supported the tsar in the 1917 revolution. However there were many factors which did not originate in Petrograd and which helped undermine the Tsar's regime even more. The army generals began to question the Tsar and his ability to rule. Many generals argued that the army couldn't fight a war and keep returning to deal with revolutionaries. The loss of support of the army generals was a blow the tsar was never able to recover from. ...read more.

Conclusion

The Tsar took no heed of this good advice and told Rodzianko to dissolve the Duma. If this did anything it made the Tsar lose more previously loyal supporters. Finally the final blow to the autocratic rule of Tsar came when he abdicated. The revolutionaries didn't mind that a new Tsar was to come they just didn't want it to be Nicholas. The Tsar chose his brother Grand Duke Mikhail to succeed him, however his brother refused when he say how difficult it was and refused the job. With nobody else to take the job Russian autocracy came to an end, as did the Romanov dynasty. In conclusion many factors of the revolution centred on Petrograd such as the police repression and the mass mutiny of the Volhynian regiment. However many factors centred on the war and other factors other that Petrograd. For example the desertion of the generals meant that the Tsar had lost the majority of the armies support. Also the fact that nobody else wanted to succeed Nicholas meant that the autocratic regime of the Tsar came to an end ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    For most of Nicholas' rule Russia was unstable. During his reign he had to cope with both the Russo- Japanese War and World War One. Failure in both of these was not good for his popularity, and he soon lost control of the country. So in a vain effort for popularity Nicholas created the Duma (the Russian Parliament)

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Rasputin was highly liked by the Tsar and Tsarina because he had found a way to cure their dying son. He also had a seductive and dominating influence over the Tsarina. Some Russians thought that the Tsarina was being controlled by Rasputin.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    Many of the middle and working class were exasperated by then. Nicholas once again turned down his only form of help to control war effort from the Duma and by doing so, turned it against him. "...the establishing of a responsible ministry," wrote the Grand Duke George, "...is considered to

  2. The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

    For example source A, the Durnovo memorandum, tells Nicholas exactly what he thinks is going to happen, and he is exactly right. However Nicholas chooses to ignore the warnings given to him and carries on with what he thinks is right, rather than listening to Durnovo who knows best at the time.

  1. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    After the 1905 Revolution, which didn't work because their was no actual leader, Tsar had to make the people happy so he signed the October Manifesto which created the Duma, the Russian parliament. The Duma was split into two the Elected Duma and the State Council.

  2. History - USSR - The main reason for the February/March Revolution was The World ...

    Anyone who criticised or disagreed with him was arrested. The Tsar's secret police, the Okhrana, enforced his rule.

  1. Why did the Tsar abdicate after the 1917 revolution

    The opposition was, The Kadets who were mainly middle class, Social Revolutionaries (Bolsheviks and Mensheviks) who were mainly peasants and The Social Democratic Party (Marxists) who were the main population, industrial workers. In 1905 they all wanted different things. The Kadets wanted two things, these were a constitution monarch and a republic.

  2. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    This petition was signed by 135,000 people and asked for both political and economic reforms, such as a Duma which would be elected by the people, freedom of speech, labour legislation, an eight hour working day and the introduction of a new and fair tax system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work