• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that the revolution of February 1917 was the unexpected outcome of local upheaval in Petrograd?

Extracts from this document...


Question 5 part b Do you agree with the view that the revolution of February 1917 was the unexpected outcome of local upheaval in Petrograd? I partially agree with the view that the 1917 revolution was due to a local Petrograd rebellion. It is because since the start of WW1 Russia had become more and more ineffective at supplying both the troops at the front line and the citizens at home. This led to animosity and resentment between solders and the working class. Also because the war was going on food and fuel were taking longer to get to Petrograd, only one third of food needed got through while only half of all fuel needs got through. This caused civil unrest and many of the civilian population now began to believe that entering the war was a rushed and rash move on Nicholas's part. The hardships of which the police put down people who complained about the war was also a trigger that turned many moderates against Nicholas. ...read more.


Source 5 goes on to say that it is hard to pinpoint a decisive blow to the Tsar which forced him to abdicate. The source says that the tsarist regime survived the 1905 revolution by making concessions and Stolypins cunning. The tsar had clearly forgotten about this previous rebellion or he would have thought ahead and made vital concessions where necessary. It would also have helped if the tsar hadn't kept changing the Dumas to just have his supporters in it. This act helped to alienate many moderates who may have supported the tsar in the 1917 revolution. However there were many factors which did not originate in Petrograd and which helped undermine the Tsar's regime even more. The army generals began to question the Tsar and his ability to rule. Many generals argued that the army couldn't fight a war and keep returning to deal with revolutionaries. The loss of support of the army generals was a blow the tsar was never able to recover from. ...read more.


The Tsar took no heed of this good advice and told Rodzianko to dissolve the Duma. If this did anything it made the Tsar lose more previously loyal supporters. Finally the final blow to the autocratic rule of Tsar came when he abdicated. The revolutionaries didn't mind that a new Tsar was to come they just didn't want it to be Nicholas. The Tsar chose his brother Grand Duke Mikhail to succeed him, however his brother refused when he say how difficult it was and refused the job. With nobody else to take the job Russian autocracy came to an end, as did the Romanov dynasty. In conclusion many factors of the revolution centred on Petrograd such as the police repression and the mass mutiny of the Volhynian regiment. However many factors centred on the war and other factors other that Petrograd. For example the desertion of the generals meant that the Tsar had lost the majority of the armies support. Also the fact that nobody else wanted to succeed Nicholas meant that the autocratic regime of the Tsar came to an end ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was Nicholas II Responsible for His Own Downfall? What can you learn from ...

    4 star(s)

    Nicholas II had huge pressures upon him to succeed; he was in power from 1894- 1917. The peasants were important to Nicholas' success but he couldn't keep them happy so in return they gave him grief. For most of Nicholas' rule Russia was unstable.

  2. Why did the Tsarist regime fall in 1917?

    Conditions worsened even more, as the First World War affected Russia colossally. The effects of the First World War contributed to the fall of the Tsarist regime in 1917 because of a number of factors. Firstly, the discontent amongst ordinary Russian civilians would have been greatly increased due to the food shortages, and defeats caused by the First World War.

  1. Examine the importance of Russian weaknesses in WW1 in explaining the start of Revolution ...

    He believed in Romanov tradition and believed that he ruled through divine right, which meant he believed he was chosen by god and refused to embrace any type of change.

  2. The February Revolution 1917.

    As this source is by a British historian it immediately suggests that it could be biased and exaggerated, but it doesn't mean that is unreliable. However it shows a huge rapid increase of support of the growing number of people who wanted down with autocracy.

  1. The February Revolution 1917 - Was Nicholas responsible for his own downfall?

    For instance, if Nicholas had known exactly what was going on then he wouldn't have ignored all the warnings he had and would have done something in order to try and stop the soldiers from mutinying and stop more workers from going on strike.

  2. How Successful Was Roosevelt’s New Deal?

    Source M also mentions 'the terror' whereas source L is not specific as it only refers to Stalin's 'dark and evil side'. Source M justifies why Stalin did what he did 'the terror was necessary, not only to keep men obedient, but even to make them believe in him'.

  1. Why did the Tsar survive the revolution of 1905, but not that of 1917?

    He paid the soldiers all the wages that he owed them and improved army conditions. The soviets however, still did not trust Nicholas and carried out further strikes and demonstrations in revolt against him. The Moscow soviet called a general strike, which resulted in a 10-day fight between the Russian troops and the soviets- 10,000 workers were killed.

  2. "What caused the Russian people to act in such a radical manner as to ...

    This petition was signed by 135,000 people and asked for both political and economic reforms, such as a Duma which would be elected by the people, freedom of speech, labour legislation, an eight hour working day and the introduction of a new and fair tax system.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work