• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you agree with the view that until the end of January 1933 it was by no means certain that Hitler would come to power?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Do you agree with the view that until the end of January 1933 it was by no means certain that Hitler would come to power? That Hitler should have found himself in a situation whereby he was even considered for the position of Chancellor in January 1933 must of course be in part accredited to his leadership skills and manipulative abilities which were evident from his earliest entrance into politics when invited to join the German Workers' Party in 1919. Many are of the opinion that he rose to power by means of political genius. However, his personal appeal and struggle for leadership from this time did not deem his being appointed Chancellor an inevitability; similarly nor did any one exclusive event preceding his appointment. Instead, we must consider the long term factors and circumstances which led to Hitler's coming to power including the weak democratic government of the Weimar Republic and Germany's social and economic scene in the 1930s that made the people restless and ready to follow another dictator, suppression of what little opposition existed through the legalisation of the SA and political intrigue. To argue that until January 1933 it was by no means certain that Hitler would come to power is a recognition of his having expended fourteen years in politics before such a breakthrough, and ...read more.

Middle

Despite the above noted change of tactics employed by Hitler, the NSDAP were often unable to take full advantage of the weak government they opposed which consisted of ever changing, unworkable coalitions. This was clear from the unstable support they received in elections, with votes rising from 2.6% in May 1928 to 37.3% in July 1932 followed by a decline to 31.1% in November 1932. Hitler also failed to win a majority vote when standing in the 1932 Presidential election against Hindenburg. There seemed no signs of certainty that he would come to power at this time, a mere nine months away from his eventual appointment. Kershaw refers to the 'adulation of a third of the population for Hitler' this of course in turn, identifies the two thirds of German people who did not support the future dictator. When analysing the situation in Germany between 1924 and 1928, referred to as the 'golden age', it could almost seem unthinkable that only four years later the country would be under the tyranny rule of Hitler. Germany saw economic recovery and political stability and even an acceptance and tolerance from ex-enemy powers. The most crucial factors behind this recovery lay with Gustav Stresemann and intervention from America. ...read more.

Conclusion

Of course the context of Source 4 must be noted in that Meissner's statement was made to the Nuremburg Tribunal after the Second World War, it is quite possible his loyalties may have still lay with Hindenburg and as such his intentions may have been an attempt to alleviate blame attributed with the President's appointment of Hitler as Chancellor. In conclusion, I strongly concur with the view that it was not certain Hitler would come to power until his eventual appointment in January 1933. There were of course many and varied reasons why the German people were not supporting their current government, but it was apparent that they voted for extremism often as much as a result of apathy as desperation and despite Germany suffering enormous social and economical devastation, Hitler and the NSDAP never drew the majority support they required to be voted into government. Hitler's appointment came as a result of Papen's persuasions and even he did not support the future dictator but believed the position of Chancellor would restrain Hitler and his party and used it as an opportunity to seek revenge against Schleicher. A success which was ironically born out of the dislike for his political motives and objectives and based on a decision made by those who were largely attempting to protect themselves is difficult to view as one which was foreseeable from the outset. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Germany 1918-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Germany 1918-1939 essays

  1. How significant was Nazi Propaganda in maintaining Hitler in power in the years ...

    Some historians would argue, therefore, that to say Hitler's power rested purely on 'totalitarian terror' is, perhaps, only a partial truth. (Kershaw, 1991, p.62). Moreover, some would argue that terror, in some instances, was actually approved to a degree as it was seen as necessary for the restoration of order.

  2. To what extent was the backstairs intrigue responsible for Hitler being able to take ...

    After World War I, Germany lay defeated, humiliated by the Treaty of Versailles, its industrial regions occupied by foreign powers, saddled with enormous war reparations, and with no military to defend itself. Yet throughout the 1920s, Hitler could not exploit these setbacks to achieve political power.

  1. How Were the Nazi's Able to Come to Power in 1933?

    However, Hindenburg was persuaded by the Chancellor and others to stand for re-election. Hitler decided to oppose him and run for the presidency himself. "Freedom and Bread" was the slogan used by Hitler with great effect in his camping. Joseph Goebbles again waged a furious propaganda campaign on behalf of Hitler, outdoing the previous election effort of 1930.

  2. Why did the Nazis come to power in Germany in 1933?

    He also realized that he had to gain the popularity of the army and business community.

  1. Why was Hitler appointed Chancellor in 1933?

    The failure of the Schleicher and Von Papen governments led to more support for the Nazi party, their support peaking in the 1932 election with 230 seats in the Reichstag. Every Chancellor had to rule by decree. Without lack of Government stength, there would have been no need for a strong alternative leader.

  2. Weimar, 1924 - 1929

    We come as enemies! Like the wolf tearing into the flock of sheep, that is how we come." d. Finance To change into a mass party, the Nazis needed more than the money obtained from members' subscriptions. Therefore, contacts were made to find finance from industrialists.

  1. adolf hitler

    After the SPD refused to reduce unemployment benefits, Mueller was replaced as Chancellor by Heinrich Bruening. However, with his party only having 87 representatives out of 577 in the Reichstag, he also found it extremely difficult to gain agreement for his policies.

  2. Why did Hitler come to power in 1933?

    to the downfall of the Weimar Republic and resulted in debilitating levels of both poverty and unemployment in Germany. This stirred up hatred in the German people that they directed at the Weimar Republic as they had signed it and resulted in them being branded as the ?November Criminals?.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work