• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Do you think this MP would have approved of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles? Explain your answer, referring to the Treaty and this Source.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Sarah Huckle 10 ? Monday, 07 October 2002 History Pages 41 - 43 Assessment Exercise 1. Study Source A. Do you think this MP would have approved of the terms of the Treaty of Versailles? Explain your answer, referring to the Treaty and this Source. I think that the British MP who made the remark in Source A, would have agreed with the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, because it was very harsh on Germany, and I think that this MP has mixed feelings about Germany. I think that he hates Germany for what they had done to Belgium, France and Britain, but on the other hand, I think he does not place the blame on the whole of Germany. There is Hitler and the German government who ordered the attacks upon the Allies, but there are the innocent Germans, such as the children who had no idea what was really going on around them. 2. Study sources B & C. a. How far do these two sources differ in their views on how to treat Germany? Source B explains that what restrictions you place on Germany, if she feels that she has been mistreated, she will find ways of taking revenge. You can take away their army, but they will assemble another one. ...read more.

Middle

If that had happened then the Allies would not have got reparations payments, and although the Allies would find a way of getting the money for the rebuilding of their countries, this defeated the object of taking revenge on Germany. 4.Study Source E. How far does this source show that Wilson failed at the Paris peace conference? Explain your answer. I think that this source shows, that Wilson feels that they have done as much as they can, and now it is up to the gods to decide their fate. He says that 'as no-one is happy, we have a just peace'. I think he is saying, that if one person, got everything they wanted then although that person may be happy, the other people may not, because they may have disagreed with what that person was saying. None of the victors got the peace they wanted, not least because they all wanted a different kind of peace. However, even when the nations first assembled in Paris, they were not free to shape the peace as they wished. Wilson was one of the victors who did not get everything they wanted. Not all his 'fourteen points were debated by the representatives from each country, so he felt that he was not satisfied with the outcome of the treaty. ...read more.

Conclusion

The treaty was an attempt to make sure this sort thing didn't happen again. They resolved this by disarming and punishing the alleged aggressors. But it was only an armistice for fifteen years, and when the fifteen years was up there was the possibility of revenge. It also showed the world that if anyone tried to take over another land and destroy its freedom, democracy and human rights, they couldn't get away with it, and should expect to pay. It was easy to see it as justified from the Allies side, but there were the ordinary people of Germany to consider. Whilst it was easy to feel the military and financial restrictions were justified at the time, by today's standards it appears rather short sighted and harsh, for example: the devaluation of the German economy caused by the German government, printing huge amounts of worthless bank notes to pay off reparations, had a devastating effect on the lives of ordinary men, women and children. Whilst the terms may seem harsh to us today, I am quite sure that people living at the time, who experienced terrible loss and devastation would feel it was more than justified, against what they must have seen to be a totally evil and hostile race. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Was The Treaty Of Versailles Justified?

    5 star(s)

    The economic strain put on Germany was probably the single most important factor in increasing hostility of the Germans towards Britain and France. The Germans by 1921 had paid off almost half of the $5,000,000,000 charged by Versailles. Then the reparations committee finally met and determined that Germany should pay

  2. Peer reviewed

    Why did the treaty of versailles provoke widespread hostility among Germans?

    4 star(s)

    This clause created a great deal of anger and hatred amongst the ordinary Germans. It seemed, to many, to show the Allies true feelings towards them - distrust and hatred. However, it is important to note that there were several problems that faced the Allied Peacemakers.

  1. "Was the treaty of Versailles fair?"

    By October of that year, Hitler called off the operation, realizing that the British could not be defeated. Following Hitler's failure in the Battle of Britain, Hitler moved on to conquer the Soviet Union in order to gain power on their oil, minerals, and wheat fields.

  2. was the treaty of versailles justified?

    Germany thought that these reductions were unfair, because no other nations had any intention of disarming or had their armies reduced, even though disarming was originally one of Wilson's objectives. This meant that Germany would be a weaker nation than many countries in Europe.

  1. Free essay

    Study Source A. Do you agree with this interpretation of the importance of ...

    This German quote supports Haig's opinion of the effect of the Somme on the troops in the German army. Other than reports from captured prisoners its unclear how he can have been sure of this at the time. Whilst he has not lied in the report, Haig might be seen

  2. The Treaty of Versailles.

    Free trade between countries 5) Colonies to have a say in their own future 6) Russia to be free of German troops 7) Belgium to be independent 8) Alsace Lorraine to go to France 9) New frontier between Austria and Italy 10) Self determination for people of Eastern Europe 11)

  1. What were the Fourteen Points and how far were that implemented in the Treaty ...

    Britain also objected strongly to point two, offering complete freedom of the seas. As Britain was a colonial empire, she relied heavily on her navy as a fighting force, and this point was hamper her ability to wage unrestricted naval warfare.

  2. Woodrow Wilson's Views and the Peace Treaty.

    I believe if Germany and Austria were to join forces it would raise tensions between the European countries once again which could possibly lead to conflict. Hence, that?s why I agree with Lloyd George and Clemenceau that it would be better to keep the countries separate.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work