• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does General Haig Deserve the Title The Butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does General Haig Deserve the Title "The Butcher of the Somme"? The battle of the Somme was one of the most significant events in British war history. Over 57,000 casualties were made on the first day. Many people believed that the battle symbolised all the horrors of warfare in World War One. There has been an ongoing debate whether Douglas Haig, Britain's commander-in-chief during the war, was right in leading many British men and even boys to their deaths. Haig had the responsibility of deciding if he would loose thousands of mens lives, and have a slight chance of winning, or to stay with the stalemate. As General Haig was a military person he knew that lives are always going to be taken during a battle, but at this great quantity was it worth it? ...read more.

Middle

Haig when he realised that his plan wasn't working, could've probably saved the battle by making a few adjustments, but he didn't. Many people believe that his tactics were outdated which he could've changed, he was arrogant believing that 'god was on his side' and shouldn't have used bombardments as they warned the Germans they were coming. General Haig has been given so much criticism after that battle, one of the criticisms were that he just threw men onto no-mans land without a second thought. This is not entirely true, as he had tried to use tanks instead of men, but there was no break through. Politicians had been one of the groups to criticise Haig, but the General had claimed to have told them of how great the losses there would be and they had agreed. ...read more.

Conclusion

But the real question is was this all worth loosing thousands of lives and could the same results have been achieved without the enormous human sacrifice. It is easy now to look back and think that there must have been a better way to have dealt with the situation, but at the time it would have not been easy to have come up with a alternative solution. We must judge General Haig with this in mind, but even back then there must've been some other way to have fought the battle without such a great loss. I believe that what happened in the summer of 1916 was wrong and could've been solved in a different way, but the title "Butcher of the Somme" is probably too harsh for General Haig as it is judging him by todays, knowledge and understanding. However, this is an argument that will go on continuously in history, and everyone will have different opinions. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Does General Haig deserve the title Butcher of the Somme?

    5 star(s)

    This factor as well as the fact that Haig was not used to the tactics of a war of attrition may have caused Haig to act rashly and therefore if he was not under so much pressure he may have acted differently.

  2. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    thinks he's very brave'). Also, Foch's views of Haig refute these negative allegations straight away. The privates knew relatively little about those of superior ranks, and so assumed that the generals sat in their chateaus, drinking copious amount of wine.

  1. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    what the situation was on the front line. He was quite happy to believe his generals when they said that the wire was cut and the men were in high spirits so he probably didn't enquire further even though he must have wondered why so many people were dying if his plans were working so well.

  2. Does General Haig deserve to be remembered as the Butcher of the Somme?

    This source blames Haig for all the deaths as letters were sent home to the families that had lost a family member due to the war. This source shows it's reliable in a way and cannot be made up, as it is a fact.

  1. Was General Haig a donkey or a great commander?

    and 56 artillery pieces were captured, whereas during the same period at Arras 18,128 prisoners and 230 artillery pieces were taken.

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    It comments on how George 'expressed his doubts to Haig', though he did not. He may be writing this after the battle as he does not want any blame for the deaths of thousands of men. He has no praise for Haig, which he did in source I, and says nothing to explain he previous feelings.

  1. Does General Haig Deserve to be remembered as 'the butcher of the Somme?'

    The main part of this plan was the artillery being able to destroy the German defences. However Haig seriously overestimated the ability of the artillery. The Germans had been in control of the Somme for a long time and had been busy building heavy defences.

  2. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    This was clearly not the case as he didn't consider that the Explosions under the German line were all going to be synchronized, or that the Germans might survive in their dugouts. Also, and even more disastrous, he didn't have a plan B.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work