• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Does Haig deserve the nickname Butcher of the Somme?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Does Haig deserve the nickname ?Butcher of the Somme?? There are various reasons why Haig deserves his nickname ?Butcher of the Somme?, on the first day of the Somme he led ?57,000 men to slaughter?. Haig was given the responsibility of these men, and therefore their lives. Due to his poor organisation ?no one quite knew what they were doing?, he left his men sitting targets for the German machine gunners. Haig?s lack of organisation also meant the British didn?t reach the front line in time. Due to the ?slow pace of the British? the Germans were able to emerge from their dugouts and set up their machine guns. This now meant the British were up against a highly defensive German army who were prepared for the British arrival; whereas ...read more.

Middle

Even though he was advised by an expert that they did not have enough to launch an attack, Haig still put forward an attack. ?The British had 49 tanks but only 15 took part in the battle?, This was because they either got stuck or broke down before they even got to the battle field; this links in with Haig?s poor organisation skills to control his army, leading weak tanks and their crews into slaughter. However, despite all of Haig?s faults in the war, many things were over exaggerated about him. In 1915 the British and French leaders decided to launch a joint offensive on the Germans. If this was to take place they would have to do it on the French/British sectors, this being the Somme. ...read more.

Conclusion

But since it was necessary to relieve French pressure at Verdun, he was ordered to continue on with the Somme. People also do not take into account that defensive and offensive technology was different then. There were far better ways of killing people than preventing troops from being killed. This meant Haig was doing what every other army was doing; he just came up against a better equipped army, whereas he was left with one with little to no experience. In conclusion perhaps Haig does not deserve his nickname ?Butcher of the Somme?; he understood and recognised flaws in the British/French offensive, but when pointed out, little notice was taken. Over the war the French and Germans had more mobilised men killed than the British; so if Haig was a ?Butcher?, what nicknames would have been given to the French and German generals? Adam Harris ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. General Haig - Butcher or Hero?

    After all that had been said about Haig's supposedly poor tactics, Foch refutes this, inferring that Haig's good tactics resulted in the Allies' success. This refutes sources 9 and 10, as they give the impression that the generals were incompetent, and cared not for their massive losses ('He boasts and skites...

  2. Does Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher Of The Somme?

    Rawlinson put up a good argument for this and was well researched. Besides, he and Laffargue were convinced it would work. Awareness Because of his distance from it, Haig really had no idea (and probably didn't care) what the situation was on the front line.

  1. Haig butcher of the Somme?

    It is expected that he supports the General's actions. This further contributes unreliability of this source. Haig designation of the job and the way he accomplished what was planned as a result of the battle, satisfied many people. S.Warburton asked in an article for a history magazine in 1988, 'Would there have been anyone better for the job?'

  2. Field Marshall Haig: 'The Butcher of the Somme?'

    This may be incorrect if George were to be afraid of Haig, this may not be his true if George did not want to reveal his true opinion. Source J is very negative about Haig's plans, despite it is written by Lloyd George (the previous source).

  1. was haig butcher of the somme

    men' which is a distinction between Coppards comment 'reinforcing for months' suggesting that there are too many so many German troops that they must have been reinforcing for a long time to get that many soldiers which is clearly inconsistent to 'short of men'.

  2. Haig Fully Deserves His Reputation as 'Bungler and Butcher of the Somme.'Discuss

    Another source that suggests that he was a butcher but also a bungler is: " Very successful attack this morning all went like clockwork. The battle is going very well for us and already the Germans are surrendering freely. The enemy is so short of men that he is collecting them from all the parts of the line.

  1. Does Haig deserve the title 'The Butcher of the Somme'?

    they knew that they would be vulnerable and could be attacked at any time with all the British soldiers just waiting, the last thing the Germans were going to do was just leave and go back to Verdun, and if they did, (which would be crazy)

  2. Does Field Marshal Haig Deserve To Be Called The Butcher of the Somme?

    of men would have been killed and the Allies would have been more successful. Therefore due to his apparent ignorance and snobbery, many historians would argue that Haig was to blame for the failings on the Western Front in 1916 and 1970.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work