• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10

Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

Extracts from this document...


Dunkirk Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Defeat Hitler's troops had captured Sedan and had started charging at 60 miles a day across France to the English channel. Churchill realised a speedy evacuation was needed to save the British Expeditionary Force, Operation Dynamo was put into action after, the allied troops retreated to Dunkirk where the Germans had pinned them in. Historian's views on Dunkirk are divided some feel that Dunkirk was a defeat because Britain lost a lot of ground, machinery, lives and morale in the forces and the British public was severely damaged. But then other historians feel Dunkirk was a victory due to the amount of men saved, the heroism of the air force, soldiers, navy and the British public who sailed their boats across and also the fact that the B.E.F was saved In many ways the defeat of Dunkirk can be defined in 3 ways, natural, military and morale defeat. A natural defeat is the number of soldiers killed in action and if there was wide spread panic. The other form of defeat is military this is the loss of craft(planes, ships, motor vehicles) and weaponry(tanks, ammunition, guns). A defeat in morale is a visible decrease in morale in the armed forces and in the public. There are many sources that back up Dunkirk was a natural defeat. Source 7 informs us of how men panicked while being bombed, it also talks about men queuing for boats up to their necks in water. When a boat did come men were fighting to get aboard them, this shows the panicked nature of the evacuation. This source came from a British Private, it is primary evidence and therefore would be biased towards allies, however this source is very negative towards Britain, this would suggest that it is reasonably reliable. This source is also only one-person's account of the evacuations, he may have a different opinion to what panic and fighting actually is. ...read more.


He comments on "How in the midst of our victory, glory came to the island people". I would expect this source to be reliable because the Prime Minster has all the facts available to him. But Churchill may be biased towards the allies this source is also a part of a propaganda piece, so some relevant points may be left out. This source is primary evidence and Churchill may have wanted to boost his reputation Source 16 comments on how Britain snatched glory out of defeat and also the bravery of the public who made an excursion to hell on holiday steamers and came back victorious. This source is primary evidence and was extracted from a speech from J.B. Priestley a very highly respected radio presenter. His show was broadcasted every Sunday. J.B. Priestley was British so he could be biased towards the allied forces. Also his speeches were a main source of propaganda to keep the British public thinking that the Allies would be victorious. So his speeches may leave out information that the forces are doing badly in the war. He may also exaggerate the good aspects of the British army. Source 17 is a speech from the British Prime Minister. He states that whatever happens in Dunkirk victory or defeat Britain will fight on. He also comments on a "over powering white glow which has ran through the country from end to end." This speech kept the spirits high of fellow politicians and the British public. This source has been extracted from Churchill's memoirs published in 1959 but written during the war; therefore this source is primary evidence. I would expect this source to be reliable because the Prime Minster has all the facts available to him. However he will probably be biased towards the allied forces. This is because he does not want to create public concern. Also his speech is propaganda so facts would be left out or exaggerated. ...read more.


It is not clear why the tanks halted but without question that delay increased the number of soldiers saved. Another factor that helped the evacuation was the cloud of smoke from burning wreckages this offered the ships cover from the Luftwaffe, 47,310 men were saved because the smoke hindered the nazi attacks on the evacuating boats. Sources that have helped me come to this conclusion that Dunkirk was natural victory are source 5 part (I), and source 10 this sources informed me of the number of allied troops saved and the effectiveness of Operation Dynamo. Operation Dynamo lasted nine days and saved 340,000 soldiers and this is why is think Dunkirk was a natural victory. I also think that Dunkirk was a morale victory because of the up-beat mood of the nation through out the country during the evacuation. Propaganda made the public that Britain would become victorious no matter what the outcome of Dunkirk. Churchill had a big part to play in keeping the spirits high with optimistic to the public and to politicians. The propaganda machine encouraged people to help in the war effort. Hundred of people gave their boats to help evacuate soldiers off the beaches of Dunkirk. So brave Britons also sailed there boats across the English Channel some with no military experience and help save the lives of their fellow countrymen. These acts of braveness were acknowledged by some of the top figures. J.P Preistly stated on one of his radio broadcast. "How little holiday steamers made an excursion to hell and came back glorious" Sources that back up my view are source 16,and 17 these sources are examples of the propaganda machinery that kept British people believing that they would win the war. So overall I conclude that Dunkirk was a military defeat but also a success because of the way the country contributed to the war effort and also the extraordinary amount of soldiers who were saved from imprisonment or death. Dunkirk Defeat Deliverance or Victory 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Another is the loss of equipment or military warfare that can do severe damage to Britain as an army. Finally, the killing and casualties of troops that will directly affect Britain's World War effort. A panicked evacuation that results in mass demoralization and fright is an important factor that is strongly linked with defeat.

  2. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    Source B is a cartoon by David Low published in the Evening Standard on 8th June 1940. It shows the British and French soldiers on boats evacuating Dunkirk whilst being bombed. Meanwhile Source D is an extract of the commentary about the Evacuation of Dunkirk from Movietone News.

  1. In what ways were people's lives affected by evacuation during the second world war?

    "The wife had been a domestic servant and regarded evacuees as domestic help", a first hand account . Some were evacuated to places like Wales were they couldn't understand their language which made communication very difficult. "I could not understand a word that was said to me", a primary source.

  2. Dunkirk. Source A is a modern painting by war artist Charles Cundall after the ...

    most of the sky, we also see that there are many Luftwaffe in the sky which suggests that there is a massive bombardment from above but they aren't very accurate, as they have only hit one civilian boat. The men are portrayed as calm and not bothered, about the fact that, bombs are exploding above their heads.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    There were many books and interviews published about the tragedies of Dunkirk many years after the event. Brian Horrocks, an evacuee from Dunkirk wrote an autobiography about his memoirs of the event - published in 1960. He's an eyewitness that makes it a primary piece of evidence written on behalf

  2. The nation(TM)s old ways of life and thought perished in the mud of Flanders

    the war so he does not believe that the war was the cause of Labours rise to eventual power. Interpretation 2; A Marwick in 'The deluge, British society and the First World War' completlet disagrees when he says 'It was during the war that the Liberal Party, going down, met the Labour Party coming up.'

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    also written in 1999 near to the year 2000 which boosts the reliability of the source to an extent that the author knows what he is talking about. Although there are many positive interpretations that Dunkirk was a triumph, there are many sources which say the opposite to this.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It doesn?t tell you who created this source or when it was produced, the source is limited because it?s a use of propaganda therefore it could have been staged by the British government. Some sources however show the opposite and support the fact that the evacuation was a ?miracle? and a success.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work