• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" (AJP Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? I believe that there is insufficient evidence in sources A to G to support this interpretation of Dunkirk. Although it appears that Dunkirk was a deliverance many of the Sources may be biased towards this view as they were published contemporaneously and would have had to be censored to keep morale high and it was actually a disaster well disguised. Source A shows Dunkirk to be deliverance as although the Luftwaffe were dropping bombs on the troops, unhindered by the RAF due to Churchill's decision to hold them back as "the war for France is over", they were still ordered and standing in queues awaiting rescue. ...read more.

Middle

And the ship in the background shows deliverance for the troops. Yet there was no heavy weaponry or AA guns as they had been destroyed. Source D states that "Our men have gained immeasurably in experience" which shows Dunkirk as a deliverance as the men who returned were now battle hardened. The source also says though "We have had great losses in equipment" which shows the disaster of Dunkirk as an army cannot fight without weaponry. Source D is likely to be biased to positive aspects of Dunkirk as it is a speech given by the Minister of War in June 1940 and may be propaganda to keep morale high. Source E mostly shows Dunkirk as deliverance by saying "Tired, Dirty, Hungry they came back-unbeatable" this implies that despite retreating from Dunkirk the British were the victors not the Germans. ...read more.

Conclusion

There was also the sinking of the Queen of the Channel with the loss of 1000 men, but this showed that the eastern mole could be used to allow men to be evacuated at a much higher rate. Acts of heroism were also shown such as Casel where British troops held out for three days against the Germans. In conclusion although the majority of the sources show Dunkirk to be a deliverance many of them were only snapshots of the beaches and do not give the full picture. Many were pieces of censored propaganda designed to keep up British morale during the War and they overlook the huge loss of equipment. It is because of this that I believe that Dunkirk was more of a disaster than a deliverance as despite rescuing 338,226 men, Britain had lost all of their weaponry and they were now ill equipped and not suited to fighting. 726 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    Hell of Dunkirk were ridiculous; he walked up and down the beach and never saw a single corpse and very little shelling, it is an eye witness because he walked along the beaches. This source is reliable because it is an eyewitness account.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The table is extracted from the "Admiralty Records" quoted from Winston Churchill. The source is primary evidence so it may be a part of propaganda and tell the people that more soldiers were saved than there actually was, however the figures seem accurate.

  1. Dunkirk and the Battle of Britain - 'Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a ...

    This source lacks evidence of delivery because there is many things missing that would fit with my knowledge there is also no evidence of disaster. It is also an example of British propaganda to help boost morale. Source C is also a photograph supposedly taken at Dunkirk in 1940.

  2. Dunkirk was a Great Deliverance and a Great Disaster

    sizes, shapes" and I know from my own knowledge that many men were rescued with the 'Mosquito Fleet' and source D does show ships of different sizes so possibly corroborating, but is not sufficient on it's own to prove or disprove the question.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    Immediately this tells me it is a book of learning so will state facts and will had collected different evidence because it is secondary, but where it covers such a large area of war history it will not be in great detail.

  2. Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster. (A.J.P Taylor) Is there sufficient ...

    This source is likely to be propaganda because it tells everyone that it was a great victory. The purposes of the newspapers were to tell everyone that everything was fine and to keep the morale of the public high. It suggests a great deliverance because the evacuation was a success.

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    A myth surrounding Dunkirk is the extent of the "Little Ship's" participation. Although between them they lifted around 26,000 men, this was a mere 8% of the total evacuated. The British Government did not make they're appeal for civilian help until 3/4 of the BEF had already been evacuated.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    a fight.? From this quote we can infer that the scenes weren?t chaotic, the soldiers were gutless and weak. The bombings weren?t as bad as they were made out to be. This source was created to show people the reality of what actually happened at Dunkirk.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work