• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster

Extracts from this document...


"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" (AJP Taylor). Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? I believe that there is insufficient evidence in sources A to G to support this interpretation of Dunkirk. Although it appears that Dunkirk was a deliverance many of the Sources may be biased towards this view as they were published contemporaneously and would have had to be censored to keep morale high and it was actually a disaster well disguised. Source A shows Dunkirk to be deliverance as although the Luftwaffe were dropping bombs on the troops, unhindered by the RAF due to Churchill's decision to hold them back as "the war for France is over", they were still ordered and standing in queues awaiting rescue. ...read more.


And the ship in the background shows deliverance for the troops. Yet there was no heavy weaponry or AA guns as they had been destroyed. Source D states that "Our men have gained immeasurably in experience" which shows Dunkirk as a deliverance as the men who returned were now battle hardened. The source also says though "We have had great losses in equipment" which shows the disaster of Dunkirk as an army cannot fight without weaponry. Source D is likely to be biased to positive aspects of Dunkirk as it is a speech given by the Minister of War in June 1940 and may be propaganda to keep morale high. Source E mostly shows Dunkirk as deliverance by saying "Tired, Dirty, Hungry they came back-unbeatable" this implies that despite retreating from Dunkirk the British were the victors not the Germans. ...read more.


There was also the sinking of the Queen of the Channel with the loss of 1000 men, but this showed that the eastern mole could be used to allow men to be evacuated at a much higher rate. Acts of heroism were also shown such as Casel where British troops held out for three days against the Germans. In conclusion although the majority of the sources show Dunkirk to be a deliverance many of them were only snapshots of the beaches and do not give the full picture. Many were pieces of censored propaganda designed to keep up British morale during the War and they overlook the huge loss of equipment. It is because of this that I believe that Dunkirk was more of a disaster than a deliverance as despite rescuing 338,226 men, Britain had lost all of their weaponry and they were now ill equipped and not suited to fighting. 726 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Dunkirk was as much a setback for the Germans as it was a victory for the British resulting in Britain being able to continue to fight and Germany now participating in a two fronted war with Britain on the West and Russia on the East.

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    The reason some sources many years later still believed that Dunkirk was a miracle is because they wanted to keep raising the spirit of the people. Also the people, who may have published it, strongly believed that Dunkirk was a miracle.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    want to show them only what they want them to know, not the full truth. Source 19 is an account by a R.A.F pilot, shot down near Dunkirk. He describes what he saw when he reached the beaches. He starts of by saying 'Most of the men were exhausted' this

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    Hell of Dunkirk were ridiculous; he walked up and down the beach and never saw a single corpse and very little shelling, it is an eye witness because he walked along the beaches. This source is reliable because it is an eyewitness account.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Here are sources back up this view. Source 6 is two pictures of allied soldiers neck high in water boarding vessels in an orderly line. The men look organised and there is no sign of frantic struggles for the boat.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    and stating that 'many more are coming by day AND night' raises the morale of people because it makes them think that the operation is going well and Britain is not going to give up. Also, the newspaper emphasises on the strengths of the British and how they work as

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The third source that also has connotations to defeat and panic is an account of an RAF pilot. He was shot down during the time and he witnessed many bombings from the German Fighters. He describes how men simply dived for cover under the water and desperately shot their rifles at the passing planes.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    written by a soldier (supposing British) who fought at Dunkirk. This source shows the reality of events. ?The evacuation has been over-glamorised?I walked along the beaches several times and never saw a corpse, there was very little shelling. In every unit there are some men who have no stomach for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work