• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." AJP Taylor. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...


"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." AJP Taylor. Is there sufficient evidence in sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer. "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" AJP Taylor. I will be looking at whether there is sufficient evidence to support this interpretation of Dunkirk. I will study a variety of sources and decide if they agree or disagree with this interpretation. On 27th May 1940 Winston Churchill, who led the British Government, put into action a plan called "Operation Dynamo". It was a plan to evacuate 350,000 British and Allied troops from the Dunkirk and it's surrounding beaches. The Allied forces had retreated to the Channel port on the Northern coast of France because the German army had pushed them back using Blitzkrieg tactics, which focused on the speed. The entire British Expeditionary Force (BEF) were located in France and all had retreated to Dunkirk. The BEF was Britain's Professional army and were the only troops that were being used by Britain. ...read more.


This is reliable as it is evidence of what happened at that time, but is limited as to what it can show. It shows Dunkirk as a Great Disaster as they resorted to such desperate measures and also because there are British Casualties. Source D is a speech by Anthony Eden, Minister of War, made in June 1940. The speech is called "The Spirit Of The British Army" It is very biased as he probably would try to raise moral or put a certain spin on Dunkirk. "...great losses in equipment." This phrase supports the view of Dunkirk being a great Disaster. But Anthony Eden also describes the BEF as "a body of seasoned veterans." and also says they have a "refusal to accept defeat". Although the Minister of War admits they had great losses in equipment he does not believe it matters as they have grown hugely in morale and have gained a self belief that "is the guarantee of final victory". If this is to be believed then it illustrates a great deliverance. Source E is an extract from The Daily Express in May 31 1940. ...read more.


I also know that almost 27,000 of the troops rescued were done so by Civilian boats and this was a huge morale boost and shows the unity of the Britain. All of this lends weight towards Dunkirk being a great Deliverance. The British left behind 1200 field guns, 1250 anti-aircraft guns, 11,000 machine guns and 75,000 vehicles. This was a great disaster for the British as they would have to quickly make all of this again. Overall, 1,121,000 Dutch, Belgian, French and British Prisoners were taken in just 6 months leading up to and at operation dynamo. This was a great disaster After Dunkirk, the German army turned south and quickly captured Paris and the remaining parts of France, almost the whole of Europe was under Nazi control. The French officially surrendered three weeks later. This effectively meant that Britain was out of the war and was a great disaster. In conclusion I believe that Dunkirk was a great Disaster because their evacuation from Europe meant that they would have to invade Europe by Sea or Air, whilst the entire German army was stationed there. I also think that their huge losses in equipment would have a huge effect as they would have to build all their vehicles and a lot of weaponry again. By David Locke ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    Hence, on May 30th, he ordered that French and British troops be evacuated in equal numbers. Having researched both miracle and disaster aspects of Operation Dynamo, there is one fundamental factor that I have not explored. A world away from the treacherous beaches, a very different kind of warfare was raging in newsrooms across Britain.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    This shows that there was a lot of machinery lost and the dive bombing tactics from the Luftwaffe were successful in sinking many rescue ships. This source is reliable because pictures do not lie; However the pictures could have been taken to create propaganda that Britain were doing well.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    Men had gone for days without food or water and had to keep running for safety from the Germans. Again the negative aspect of an autobiography is that things can become exaggerated to make their selves sound good for example 'All I could do as I passed these groups of

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    However even though many years later different interpretations were revealed some British newspapers still produced that Dunkirk was a miracle. The source on the following page, which is a supplement in "The South Wales Echo" published in the 1980s, 40 years later.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    German morale was at an all time high, and a retreating B.E.F wasn't exactly going to harm this. The first defeatist source is a picture taken at the beaches of Dunkirk in which trucks are built onto the sea to facilitate the evacuation, some may see it as brilliant improvisation

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    This source is from the book "The Defence of The United Kingdom" therefore this source should be quite reliable because a respected historian, Brian Collier wrote it. He does not seem to be biased towards Britain because the source is very negative.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Triumph?

    The validity and the reliability of this source are very weak in regards to the interpretation because the author who wrote the source is a traitor, this makes him biased towards the Germans side and exaggerate the questions to ?undermine the British confidence?.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    Although the Germans were bombing they missed the British, this allowed them to escape. Source E, a primary source shows an image of British soldiers waiting to be evacuated whilst sitting on the beach at Dunkirk. The British soldiers are shown as being relaxed and happy.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work