• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster". Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your knowledge to explain your answer.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

History course question 2: "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster". Is there sufficient evidence in sources D to J to support this interpretation? Use the sources and your knowledge to explain your answer. There is sufficient evidence to support this in the information below: Source d is a first hand painting of the evacuation of Dunkirk it shows the ships being bombarded with shells, bombs and torpedoes form planes, It shows hundreds of men on the beach rushing towards the boats in big swarms, proving the fact that they were very nervous and desperate to get on board and off the beaches, thee is a lot of smoke coming from the destroyed ships, in which thousands of solders and crews would have been killed in each boat! Source e is a photograph of troops waiting on the beaches, this photo shows the troops quite in order and disciplined, there is also no attacks from the Germans at this point so this must mean that the attacks weren't on going and there were breaks. ...read more.

Middle

not point out that thousands dead and captured, calling the fleet an armada of ships-all shapes and sizes, but that was only the first article the second is more of a rundown version as it is calling the army: Tired, Dirty, Hungry but unbeatable this is not far from the truth, also saying that there was a touch of glory in the army as it was see-able on the solders face's. Source I is an extract from a book from 1965 written by an British Historian so this is a secondary piece of evidence, he gives a lot of information on the evacuation but we cant be sure that it is reliable as he was not there, he believes that operation dynamo succeed beyond all expectation, He gives evidence of boats such as destroyers and says that there was a wide verity of boats helping, he proves that on the 3rd June the last men were evacuated, in all 339, 226 men evacuated but only 139,997 were French ...read more.

Conclusion

were designed to go very low at an vertical axis (they were able to pull up very quickly and avoided crashing), which to the solders looked like it was going suicide to hit them, this caused more despair and a loss of self-confidence. There were 2 very long wave breakers that were untouched the navy tried to bring up a large destroyer beside one and it managed to collect about 1000 solders every hour, this was a quicker way of evacuating, but it was bombed and the ship was destroyed but this proved hat it worked, on the second wave breaker they retried this and it worked again, the Germans did not destroy this one and it proved effective. In the begging when the B.E.F. was sent to Dunkirk in September they were sent with insufficient food and equipment, which pro-told the events, which would happen. All together this evidence proves that it was a Great deliverance but a great disaster. Edward Semprini Form 3 History course work ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The book was written in 1957 so it is secondary evidence, however this means that the book is not part of propaganda and does not have to be sensitive to the situation. Collier also has the advantage of hindsight. Source 20 talks about how easy it was to kill many Allied soldiers on the Beach.

  2. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    With Source D we know it is accurate and reliable because we the documentarily was directly from the government Overall the 2 sources disagree with the statement Source I disagrees with the statement as well but does shows signs that the evacuation may have been a disaster.

  1. Haig in sources

    He lied, he didn't know whether the barbed wire was cut or even if there was any barbed wire, because he never visited the western front. Source G is a cartoon from Punch Magazine "There are two essential differences....1. The absence of the enemy.... 2. The absence of the general."

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    It may be biased and only show the worse aspects of Dunkirk, a German took it and I'm sure they might have been using this as both propaganda and to demoralize their opposition. The British were known for their high morale and the German Army were desperately trying to eliminate their opponents in body and mind.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    However the sources differ as they have different views of evacuation. Source C shows a fairly positive view of evacuation whereas source F shows a very negative attitude towards evacuation. Sources C and F are also different types of sources.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The large boat could belong to the navy and would be very valuable, loss of this would be very expensive, along with the rest of the abandoned equipment. The source seems reliable as it is first hand primary evidence. It is useful for showing defeat as it displays what it looked like at Dunkirk after the evacuation.

  1. Evaluation of sources for the sufficiency, drawing conclusions from evidence - "Dunkirk was a ...

    Since a British War Minister wrote and spoke this speech means it will definitely be biased.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    written by a soldier (supposing British) who fought at Dunkirk. This source shows the reality of events. ?The evacuation has been over-glamorised?I walked along the beaches several times and never saw a corpse, there was very little shelling. In every unit there are some men who have no stomach for

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work