• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster"

Extracts from this document...


"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" AJP Taylor Is there evidence in sources A-F to support this interpretation? Sources and own knowledge -This statement is a very vague statement and as a result, it is a statement that can be easily justified using Sources A to F. In this response I will examine what each source is telling us, and whether it agrees, disagrees or is neutral to the statement, "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster". The Dunkirk evacuation, codenamed Operation Dynamo by the British, was the large evacuation of Allied soldiers from May 26 to June 4, 1940, during the Battle of Dunkirk. The plan was created by British Vice Admiral Bertram Ramsay and was accepted by Winston Churchill. In the 9 days, more than three hundred thousand (338,226) soldiers - 218,226 British and 120,000 French - were rescued from Dunkirk, France and the surrounding beaches by a hastily assembled fleet of about seven hundred boats. ...read more.


From my own knowledge I know that this photo is more than likely to have been taken before the bombing raids and the attack on the British soldiers started, as there are no boats shown in the photograph, when we know that boats were there when they were being attacked to take the soldiers home and this would explain the lack of disruption. Furthermore, photographs only show a snapshot in time, and as a result this source can prove neither that Dunkirk was a deliverance or disaster for the British. -Source C can support both claims that Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster. It shows this as soldiers are firing at planes with normal rifles, and could be succeeding in destroying them. The soldiers shooting at the sky and what almost looks like an explosion in the background show this. However the dark object in the background could just be a ship that had come to evacuate the soldiers. ...read more.


It tells us many of the facts that led him to create the statement. As Taylor was a British historian he would have considered all evidence before making his point and any other conclusion. As a result, this source shows maximum reliability, as he backs up his point with lots of evidence. -With each source taken into account, we can see that Dunkirk was both a great deliverance and a great disaster. However, we should also take into account the fact that Germany 'allowed' the majority of the British army to escape. This point shows that even if the evacuation is seen as a great deliverance it could have been completely different. In a summary, due to the evacuation of many soldiers and almost the entire of the B.E.F which made up the all of the fully trained British soldiers. I think Dunkirk was more a deliverance and a blessing in disguise. It showed that the whole of Britain was ready to protect their army and was ready for war; this served as a massive morale booster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    We know that nearly all of the B.E.F were evacuated and many saw the evacuation as well improvised, well ordered and calm. Many regard Dunkirk as a psychological victory, for numerous soldiers and civilians Dunkirk boosted morale leading to a sense of bravery and unity known as 'Dunkirk Spirit'.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    Here are sources back up this view. Source 6 is two pictures of allied soldiers neck high in water boarding vessels in an orderly line. The men look organised and there is no sign of frantic struggles for the boat.

  1. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    The propaganda machine was in full flow manufacturing the Dunkirk myth. Under media censorship, victory was clutched from humiliating military defeat. News of events at Dunkirk were not released to the British public until 30th May, 5 days after Operation Dynamo began.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The photographs of soldiers being evacuated from Dunkirk shows soldiers neck high in water boarding vessels in an orderly line. The men look organised and there is no sign of panic or struggles for the boat. There are a lot of people in these pictures, so this suggests that a large number of people escaped.

  1. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    The president, Winston Churchill gave a speech to the House of Commons on the 4th of June when the rescued troops had returned home. In the speech, he praised the Dunkirk evacuation and talks of people looking back on the events in Dunkirk as a great success, no matter what records would show.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    Thousands of pounds were lost as British were forced to leave all equipment on the beach. Soldiers destroyed what had to be abandoned because they didn't want the Germans to have use of them. For soldiers who escaped German attack at Dunkirk, faced the cheers of people back home.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    they might have been waiting in quest in the sea for a boat, therefore they are traumatised by the time they get to the boat, and anyway this could be a one-off. The author has exadurated by calling the book 'Dunkirk: Pillar of Fire' he may have done this just to attract buyers for the book.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It also informed people that the ?miracle? was not a miracle at all. However, this source is limited in its usefulness as the event was recalled twenty-two years later; this may have resulted in slight exaggeration and memory loss. Also, it is one person?s view of the events that occurred which makes it less reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work