• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster"

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster" AJP Taylor Is there evidence in sources A-F to support this interpretation? Sources and own knowledge -This statement is a very vague statement and as a result, it is a statement that can be easily justified using Sources A to F. In this response I will examine what each source is telling us, and whether it agrees, disagrees or is neutral to the statement, "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster". The Dunkirk evacuation, codenamed Operation Dynamo by the British, was the large evacuation of Allied soldiers from May 26 to June 4, 1940, during the Battle of Dunkirk. The plan was created by British Vice Admiral Bertram Ramsay and was accepted by Winston Churchill. In the 9 days, more than three hundred thousand (338,226) soldiers - 218,226 British and 120,000 French - were rescued from Dunkirk, France and the surrounding beaches by a hastily assembled fleet of about seven hundred boats. ...read more.

Middle

From my own knowledge I know that this photo is more than likely to have been taken before the bombing raids and the attack on the British soldiers started, as there are no boats shown in the photograph, when we know that boats were there when they were being attacked to take the soldiers home and this would explain the lack of disruption. Furthermore, photographs only show a snapshot in time, and as a result this source can prove neither that Dunkirk was a deliverance or disaster for the British. -Source C can support both claims that Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster. It shows this as soldiers are firing at planes with normal rifles, and could be succeeding in destroying them. The soldiers shooting at the sky and what almost looks like an explosion in the background show this. However the dark object in the background could just be a ship that had come to evacuate the soldiers. ...read more.

Conclusion

It tells us many of the facts that led him to create the statement. As Taylor was a British historian he would have considered all evidence before making his point and any other conclusion. As a result, this source shows maximum reliability, as he backs up his point with lots of evidence. -With each source taken into account, we can see that Dunkirk was both a great deliverance and a great disaster. However, we should also take into account the fact that Germany 'allowed' the majority of the British army to escape. This point shows that even if the evacuation is seen as a great deliverance it could have been completely different. In a summary, due to the evacuation of many soldiers and almost the entire of the B.E.F which made up the all of the fully trained British soldiers. I think Dunkirk was more a deliverance and a blessing in disguise. It showed that the whole of Britain was ready to protect their army and was ready for war; this served as a massive morale booster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    to save the lives of brave soldiers, they ignored all the dangers of being killed by the Luftwaffer and help saved many more lives. Churchill acknowledged their Bravery. It is a popular view that Dunkirk was a natural victory due to the amount of men that where saved in such a short period.

  2. Dunkirk: Miracle or Disaster?

    The propaganda machine was in full flow manufacturing the Dunkirk myth. Under media censorship, victory was clutched from humiliating military defeat. News of events at Dunkirk were not released to the British public until 30th May, 5 days after Operation Dynamo began.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The Prime Minister being panicked shows the true chaos that was Dunkirk. The source is reliable as it is a primary source written from Churchill to his General so it wouldn't be censored and Churchill wouldn't lie as his General would need to know the true situation.

  2. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    Another primary source is Ivan Daunt, he was at Dunkirk and was interviewed in 2004 for BBC. 2004 is many years after the event and the soldiers' might have forgotten some detail about Dunkirk. 'There was no food and we thought we were going to starve.'

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    Here are sources back up this view. Admiralty Records, quoted by Winston Churchill, shows a table of the dates of the evacuation, number of soldiers saved on each day and the total number of soldiers saved during Operation Dynamo. The source states the evacuation went on for a total of nine days saving 338,226 allied troops.

  2. The Evacuation of Dunkirk.

    It is from a book 'World War 2'. The source implies that the BEF left many of their equipment and much of it was destroyed. Many people believed that the British were forcefully pushed out of France and failed to stop the Nazis from attacking France.

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    The next source I looked at supporting this aspect of defeat was an article from the South Wales Echo written on 5th June 1940. The source tells us how Churchill feared that Dunkirk would be a 'Colossal Military Disaster' and how 30,000 British troops did not return to Britain.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    It also informed people that the ?miracle? was not a miracle at all. However, this source is limited in its usefulness as the event was recalled twenty-two years later; this may have resulted in slight exaggeration and memory loss. Also, it is one person?s view of the events that occurred which makes it less reliable.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work