Dunkirk Was A Great Deliverence and a Great Disaster

Authors Avatar

“Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster.” Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer

In this essay I am going to use sources A to F to see whether there is sufficient evidence to support the interpretation that “Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster.”

Source A shows the official war artist Charles Cundall’s interpretation of Dunkirk. The painting shows Dunkirk in two different ways. One is the fact that boats are carrying people away to safety and the other that people are still left on the beaches and still in danger. They are however very organised and well structured which shows that they are a good, well-organised army. Source A is however biased as it is written by the official war artist Charles Cundall and therefore it may be closely monitored and will have to show this impression of Dunkirk as more of a success than a disaster to keep morale and keep people’s hopes alive back in Britain. Therefore I would say that this focuses more on the deliverance being a success than the fact that they were in the mess in the first place. However the painting only shows a snapshot of the battle and many different events may of occurred elsewhere.

Join now!

Source B is a photograph of the troops lined up being spoken to on the Dunkirk beaches. This source has very limited usefulness as it does not show who took the photograph and even if we did know a photograph is only a snapshot in time so it tells us nothing of the events that occurred before or after the event. The photograph shows a well organised British army and that they are still brave although they are all alone in enemy lines. I would say it is more supportive of the fact that it was a great deliverance ...

This is a preview of the whole essay