• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk Was A Great Deliverence and a Great Disaster

Extracts from this document...


"Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." Is there sufficient evidence in Sources A to G to support this interpretation? Use the sources and knowledge from your studies to explain your answer In this essay I am going to use sources A to F to see whether there is sufficient evidence to support the interpretation that "Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a great disaster." Source A shows the official war artist Charles Cundall's interpretation of Dunkirk. The painting shows Dunkirk in two different ways. One is the fact that boats are carrying people away to safety and the other that people are still left on the beaches and still in danger. They are however very organised and well structured which shows that they are a good, well-organised army. Source A is however biased as it is written by the official war artist Charles Cundall and therefore it may be closely monitored and will have to show this impression of Dunkirk as more of a success than a disaster to keep morale and keep people's hopes alive back in Britain. ...read more.


Source C shows the troops on the Dunkirk beaches firing on German planes. I am unsure as to why this photograph was taken as it serves no real purpose other than to support the idea that Dunkirk was a great deliverance over a great disaster as it shows that although they were greatly outnumbered they were still brave and never gave up, this is why I feel it was only taken to show people back in Britain that all was not lost and to keep morale up. The photograph is however a snapshot in time and an action shot so it could have been for a different purpose as the photographer is not named. Source D is an extract from a speech by the Minister of War in 1940. It's purpose is to boost morale as it uses language such as "seasoned veterans" and "guarantee of final victory." It is however quite limited as it is going to be government supporting as it was written by the minister of war and at the time there was censorship as to what could be published in the press. ...read more.


Therefore the source shows the event as a great deliverance. Source F is an extract from "English History" which was published in 1965. It shows a more balanced view of the events and shows it from both views. It says that the men were very brave and well organised, but many aircraft and artillery were lost in the process. This shows that he had written this source based on different primary sources to give a balanced view of the battle. Therefore I would say it shows reasons for the fact that it was a success and a disaster but from a neutral perspective. In conclusion I feel that Dunkirk is known for a number of reasons, firstly the bravery of the men and the brilliant organisation of the troops on the beaches. On the other hand the army returned to Britain exhausted and tired, they had no weaponry. My view on the matter is that Britain's organisation was superb but when Britain limped back to mainland the morale was low and without the weaponry it would in my view be remembered more as a disaster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    so Churchill could just be too involved in the evacuation to give a fair depiction. With such a short space of time to plan this evacuation it was never going to be orderly with dishevelled troops left to fend for themselves and Luftwaffe bombing panicking the troops and left them just wanting to return to Britain.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Source 8 is an artist's impression of the Dunkirk evacuation by Charles Cundall who is an official war artist. His impression shows Dunkirk with many soldiers scattered on the beach waiting to be evacuated, also we can see a range of boats packed with troops all these things are natural of an evacuation.

  1. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    The retreat was unorganised and the soldiers did not have enough time to gather up guns and vehicles. The number of boats and aircraft lost was also very high. Out of 860 ships used to save 340,000 men, 243 boats were sunk by attacks from Luftwaffe.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The British Forces managed to save the B.E.F, which kept Britain in the war. The B.E.F. being saved generally boosted morale in both the armed forces and the public. Many other Historians feel that Dunkirk was a victory of morale.

  1. Was Dunkirk a Miracle or a Disaster?

    This source doesn't actually provide any negative statements about the operation as a newspaper is something someone would want to read about and if there was a negative points towards Operation Dynamo, British people would worry and loose hope.

  2. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    I know that a huge number of soldiers died at Dunkirk, and these surviving members of the B.E.F had probably witnessed countless killings and captures at the hands of Adolf Hitler. Only a few thousands were rescued on the first days of Dunkirk so it probably was chaotic.

  1. How successful was Dunkirk

    This account is primary, first hand evidence so the German is speaking from personal experience producing a useful source. On the other hand the source was written by a German which would mean it is more than likely to be bias towards his nation.

  2. The Evacuation from Dunkirk in World War 2 was a great Disaster for Britain. ...

    Source I is a media report, (we assume) from the early 1940s, therefore it is a primary source. It was reported at the time of Dunkirk. Movie Tone News reported it like this. ?More cheering evidence of the success of this amazing military exploit is the presence in Britain of

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work