• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Dunkirk was both a deliverance and a disaster. Is there sufficient evidence to support this view in sources D to I.

Extracts from this document...


Dunkirk was both a deliverance and a disaster. Is there sufficient evidence to support this view in sources D to I. Dunkirk was an event that can be interpreted in many different ways. However within these sources there is only enough evidence to support one of the outstanding ways in the question, deliverance. This is due to the fact that the sources are in support of Dunkirk and are positive means that disaster is not mentioned because they want to uplift the spirit and make people believe. There is some support, just not enough. In the written sources there are many points that are in support of deliverance. They show this by talking about the bravery of men in source G "Our men have gained immeasurably in experience of warfare and in self-confidence", they also comment on the number of men saved in source H "TENS OF THOUSANDS SAFELY HOME ALREADY" and finally how organized they where "As I saw them tramping along a pier, still in formation" showing that they where proud and even if they are home they still want to be part of the B.E.F. ...read more.


Also other thing such as when the "Minister of War" writes a quote he has to write it in a way that will boost his soldiers because it's his job to them convinced and keep their morale up. Another reason for them being positive is that they have not yet discovered the long term affects because they are all written during the battle par one which is written in 1965 this means he can look back and comment on the overall picture rather than just the situation the soldiers where in. However we know that these sources are not completely representative due to the fact o the DORA (Defence of the realm) act which limited the content that was shown in the papers. We can prove this buy looking at who has taken the picture in source D which in the case is taken by Charles Cundall who would be under the DORA act and only be allowed to perceive the battle of Dunkirk in a good way he was also commissioned by the government to paint this picture meaning he also had to make it look as if the government are doing a good job organizing the operation. ...read more.


If these source would have been German then they would, in my opinion be the complete opposite for example in sources F where the British soldiers are shooting up at the planes the point of view would be from the plane looking down at the venerable little soldiers getting attacked to make the German army look powerful and as if they have every think under control. In conclusion, Operation Dynamo can be perceived as both a disaster and deliverance, but due to the fact that these sources lack vital information pushes these sources to the side of deliverance. This would be mainly because all bar one was wrote during the battle of Dunkirk and was therefore under the act of DORA so the content within the picture or article would have to suite the government guidelines which were supporting the B.E.F as we would hope. However, the one article that was written after the battle of Dunkirk, which was sources I, just does not have enough sufficient information to prove in Dunkirk being a disaster. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    The information from this source is correct operation Dynamo lasted for nine days. However what the sources leaves out is how many men were actually on the beach at Dunkirk in the first place it omits how many died. Without that information, the number of men saved is irrelevant.

  2. Analysis of different sources of information about Dunkirk.

    ' Source K is useful in telling us that even though Dunkirk was catastrophic the image of little ships and seamen pulling together were exploited in British propaganda. Also it tells that valuable equipment had been left behind and that troops were retreating by Luftwaffe gunfire.

  1. Dunkirk - Defeat, Deliverance or Victory?

    It cannot be far from the truth since it was indeed taken at the time but it only seems to exploit the worst areas of Dunkirk, after all 330,000 troops did escape that coast. The South Wales Echo newspaper reported on all of the events in the war, since so many Welsh soldiers were out there fighting the war.

  2. Was Dunkirk a defeat?

    When Hitler held the tanks, as stated in the text the British had time to dig in and hold the port and beaches sufficiently enough for 340,000 lives to be saved. The source is written from a respected historian Allan Bullock, so it must be quite reliable, and also this

  1. Haig in sources

    Any Tommy could have told any of the commanders that shell fire just lifts wire up and drops it down often in a worse tangle than before. The generals were incapable of anything more imaginative than repeating the same failed assaults by infantry.

  2. Defeat, Deliverance or Victory? Which of these best describes Dunkirk?

    Source 14(ii) by Atkins supports Dunkirk as demoralising for the British by saying 'many (of those rescued) did not want to know about further involvement' , it shows the negative impact it had on the British troops. These demoralised soldiers were useless in war time as the source suggests when

  1. How successful was Dunkirk

    Finally Dunkirk could be seen as deliverance. Some would argue that the military aspect was the most important part of victory. This mainly due to the surprising number of evacuated troops. A number of sources back this view up an example being a source which is "English History" written by A.J.P Taylor.

  2. Dunkirk and the Battle of Britain - 'Dunkirk was a great deliverance and a ...

    Missing from the source is the soldiers burying themselves in the sand as an act of defence. So overall there is not enough evidence to agree or disagree with AJP's interpretation of Dunkirk. This source is also biased towards the British and could be used as propaganda in the war to help boost morale and to convince people to recruit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work