• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

During Stalin's regime of 1924 to 1953, how did the political situation within Russia affect the output of the prominent composers of the time? Pay particular attention to the works of Dmitri Shostakovich.

Extracts from this document...


During Stalin's regime of 1924 to 1953, how did the political situation within Russia affect the output of the prominent composers of the time? Pay particular attention to the works of Dmitri Shostakovich. 'Only a few episodes in the history of the USSR attracted praise...the cultural splendour of Dmitri Shostakovich'1 Throughout the centuries music has always been a key part of Russian life, and many influential composers have arisen from the country such as Borodin, Prokoviev, Rachmaninoff, Mussorgsky and Tchaikovsky to name but a few. Musical traditions have always been important to the Russian people as many composers have based their music on the numerous cultures that exist throughout the country; such cultures include Jewish, Gypsy, Mongolian, Siberian, Arabic and Turkish. Famous works such as Borodin's "Steppes over Central Asia" are well known for their cultural motifs and style. Although, heavily influenced by culture, compositions were greatly affected by the political situation in Russia at the turn of the 20th century. Shostakovich became the most prominent of all Soviet composers as he was working during a period of immense change, turmoil, and terror. Stalin is renowned for his almost 30 year regime as a Soviet dictator. ...read more.


Pravda the communist newspaper denounced the opera as neurotic, coarse and vulgar in a vitriolic article headed 'Chaos instead of music'. Shostakovich was made to be an enemy of the people and his music was branded as 'cacophonous' and 'pornographic', Pravda also threatened that the composer 'could end very badly' if he did not mend his ways. From that day, Shostakovich had a ready packed suitcase with warm clothes and some belongings in case the NKVD, Stalin's private police force, ever arrived unannounced. As Stalin's regime strengthened the effect it had on Russian music was immense. For example, there were orchestras without conductors (both in rehearsal and performance), claiming it was a way of becoming socialist pioneers by living a 'life based on equality and human fulfilment through free collective work.'2 There was also a movement of 'concerts in the factory' using experimental objects such as sirens, turbines and hooters, creating new sounds by electronic means. Many believed it would lead to a new musical aesthetic closer to the psyche of the workers. Shostakovich took advantage of this movement and used the sounds of factory whistles to the climax of his second symphony 'To October'. ...read more.


Shostakovich stuck to composing film music and patriotic cantatas for public consumption, meaning he had to keep works, such as the First Violin Concerto and Fourth String Quartet, hidden from the authorities. Only after the death of Stalin could Shostakovich express his true self again, and he was able to freely compose his Tenth Symphony, which later became one of fifteen different symphonies. Shostakovich was able to fulfil his musicality after the Stalin regime. However, it is tragic to think that because of such a strict regime Shostakovich often held back, and it is difficult to know whether or not he would have composed more operas or been more experimental in his style. In 1975 Dmitri Shostakovich died, having survived the most terrifying regime ever to exist in Russia. He became a respected musician, creating influential symphonic works that gave audiences an insight into what life was really like in Stalinist Russia. However, in the absence of the operas that Shostakovich may have written, it is the works of his 15 symphonies and 15 string quartets that have established him as the one composer, unquestionably loyal to Soviet Russia, who has achieved world recognition and status. 1 Russia: An experiment with the people. Robert Service 2 Images of Music Erich Auerbach 3 My Testimony. Dmitri Shostakovich Danielle Hartley 13SD6 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Russia, USSR 1905-1941 essays

  1. How did the rule of Stalin affect the Soviet Union?

    All creative artists were supposed to be loyal to Stalin. Andrei Zhdanov, a member of the communist party who succeeded Kirov told the artists what they had to do. People who wanted to publish literature had to belong to the Union of Soviet Writers, which was established in 1932.

  2. The Policies of Joseph Stalin 1928 1953

    Source J shows how Stalin manipulated laws so he could maintain his power. "Stalin will not let him live"; this shows the methods Stalin used were seen as "normal"; his is not being called a murderer directly. Stalin only maintained his rule because he eliminated the opposition; he was extremely

  1. “Collectivisation was a political success but an economic failure and a human disaster” discuss.

    With the enforcement of collectivisation, many peasants moved to the cities, this meant more people for an industrial workforce, more people working in factories of course meant more profit and more of the demands of the five year plans would be met.

  2. How did The Purges affect Russia?

    The wave of Terror also gave Stalin the opportunity to remove the 'old' members of the Bolshevik party who had individual beliefs and who owed nothing to Stalin, and replace them with loyal and obedient followers of whom would never dare question any of Stalin's policies.

  1. Stalin man or monster

    However it can be argued that this deception that Stalin had wasn't part of a personality that made him a monster. Deception is a human characteristic that some people have, and Stalin being suppressed not only in his childhood but by Lenin himself it would be very understanding to see

  2. Consider this judgement on the consequences of Stalin's leadership of the Soviet Union 1928 ...

    These figures are averages for the whole country, in reality, suffering was intensified in the countryside as the main purpose of grain requisition was to feed the industrial towns. Collectivisation had been achieved at the cost of many millions of lives and the devastation of the agricultural system In an

  1. Russia 1905-1945 Stalin - man or monster - source based questions

    The problem is that many people believe Stalin�s �� good intentions �� towards them. In this source Stalin is clearly trying to show how he acted in a situation like this and that he shows he can be the best leader Russia has ever had.

  2. Source based work on Impressions of Stalin?

    After the Second World War he would definitely be trying to improve his public image to win over Eastern Europe and this source is a clear example of the propaganda he used to generate the image of a caring yet successful politician.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work