• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economic consequences of the first world war

Free essay example:

What were the main economic consequences of the First World War?

At the end of the First World War in 1918, the economic state of Europe was in such a perilous condition that the impending rebuilding of the continent seemed such a remote and unrealistic possibility.  The war had devastated much of the Western European economies; the most affected nations were France and Germany, followed by Belgium, Italy and Austria. In addition to the complete economic stagnation of the period throughout much of Western Europe, there were vast regions of Eastern Europe that also suffered greatly. The majority of Europeans suffered in one way or another, Geographical borders changed, industry changed, and demographics changed, all which had severe economic repercussions throughout Europe.  Four years concentration of total war had ravaged and pillaged the European economies, resulting in a massive decline in production. Additionally, Europe had been unable to regain her prominent share in world trade that she enjoyed prior to 1914, nor had she been able to reassert her influence and dominance over overseas markets. The emergence of new economic powers after the War such as The USA and Japan aswell as the rise of Hitler and Lenin, arguably the two most important political characters of the twentieth century, came as a direct result of the war which also had major impacts on the economies of many European nations.  In no way can the impact of the war be underestimated or tamed. At the very least it was a major factor in shaping the world that we live in today.

The First World War completely shattered and devastated many European economies. In Germany alone the cost of the war was estimated at $40 billion USD. When considering the fact that there has subsequently been 87 years of inflation since this expenditure, in modern terms the figure would be closer to $1100 billion USD[1]. The cost of the war was equally high in France and Russia and well into the billions in Italy, Belgium, Britain and Poland.

Another major economic impact of the war was that it narrowed the gap between the economies of both Europe and the United States of America. Despite the USA being well into its industrialization programme and having a steadily growing economy the European economy was still superior to the US economy. However the devastating effects of the First World War resulted in massive economic stagnation and declination, which allowed the US to catch up and bridge the gap. In the period following the War it is estimated that the US economy grew by triple that of Europe’s economy in relative terms[2]. As a result of this economic alteration and switch in economic superiority, investment in Europe fell substantially, which effectively enhanced the problems already facing the economies of the continent. Newly established Asian companies relocated to the US, and many European firms decided to cross the Atlantic to save their businesses. This mass movement and relocation of businesses from Europe to the US inflicted more desolation and misery upon the governments of war torn Europe. The loss of investment resulted in a reduction in the generation of income, which was critically necessary at the time in order to improve and rebuild the devastated economies.

Despite the large-scale economic stagnation and decline that affected many sectors of European economies as a result of the First World War, many European economies were saved by the resurrection and growth of other various industrial sectors. Although the major industries such as textiles and shipbuilding were effectively diminished forever, other industrial sectors such as construction industries and their suppliers flourished thus rendering various European economies susceptible to economic growth and potential future economic prosperity.  The demand for goods such as bricks and tools created the guaranteed outflow of resources, which were critical for laying the necessary foundations to entice economic growth. Therefore some industries were able to capitalise in the aftermath of the war.

The rise in inflation rates and the devaluing of many currencies throughout Europe also prevented the immeadiate recovery of many European economies.  The theory of  “invisible devalue” is often used by historians to describe the period of time after the war where no trading or saving took place, which therefore meant that many currencies throughout Europe were effectively useless.

The First World War also served as the major catalyst that resulted in the rise of communism.  Russia’s failure during the War underlined the need for large-scale changes throughout the nation and these changes found a new face via the emergence of the Bolsheviks and most notably Vladimir Lenin.  Lenin’s implementation of his War Communism economic strategy resulted in the alienation of Russia from mainland Europe and thus the complete destruction of trading links between East and West. In terms of the bigger picture this alienation and destruction of major trading routes further contributed to the economic declination of European economies and further dented the economies of the countries that were active trading partners with Russia.

Economically, the war completely devastated Europe. Every European economy suffered through the war and trading amongst European countries never really recovered. Through the political change in Europe, the economy suffered and this effectively allowed the USA to catch up and overtake the European economy in the preceding years of the war.  Although many short-term problems were created by the war, the long-term problems far outweighed those in the short term. These long-term factors effectively led to the Second World War and the outbreak of the Cold War. Effectively the war shaped the Twentieth Century, as we now know it.

Bibliography

  • Internet website: http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm. Found by searching “impact of the first world war” into a Google search bar.
  • The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3,

How the economy suffered?

  • ‘Social consequences of World War 1: The case of Germany’, A. Marwick, Total War and Social Change.
  • Facing Total War: German Society 1914-1918, J. Kocka

[1]  Source taken from internet website:

http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm.

      Website gives a brief explanation on the impacts of the war in Germany

  [2]  The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and

         Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3, How the economy

         suffered? (after the First World War)


[1]  Source taken from internet website: http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm. Website gives a brief explanation on the impacts of the war in Germany

[2]  The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3, How the economy suffered?

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Germany should receive back both the mines and territory without payment. France should supply Germany from Lorraine with at least 50%. 3. Problems in Upper Silesia should be held and in coming to a final decision the regard will be pay by the principles of the allies.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    Germany itself had a small empire, with land in Russia and therefore held some influence in that area until the end of World War one, when the Treaty of Versailles demanded that the land be returned to Russia, diminishing to a great extent Germany's empire, and greatly reducing her power.

  1. Causes of World War 2

    This destroyed the morale of every citizen of Germany. The Wall Street crash in the 1930's had its effects ripple across every county in the globe. One of the worst affected was Germany as it was already in a state of hyper-inflation. This meant that what would seemingly have been intolerable living conditions in Germany had just become double

  2. Which Had A greater impact on the Second World War

    the French were allowed to do this, the area was full of raw materials and coal which was equivalent of the reparation payment therefore they took anything of any value. Even though Germany was heavily in debt the USA's Dawes Plan saved the situation and extended reparations payments.

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    * Britain was afraid of the power of France because Louis Philippe was French. * Britain asked Belgium to change the king. Finally Belgium chose Prince Leopold (the uncle of Queen Victoria) to be the king. * Significance of the independence of Belgium in 1830 * A.

  2. Questions on World War One.

    Because alliance system led to intensive armament race between the powers and proned to making a local war into a general one. This sounds quite reasonable for the outbreak of the First World War is due to the granting of Germany's "blank cheque" to Austria-Hungary who cashed it immediately by sending an unacceptable ultimatum to Serbia.

  1. What were the main economic consequences of the First World War

    Additionally, Europe had been unable to regain her prominent share in world trade that she enjoyed prior to 1914, nor had she been able to reassert her influence and dominance over overseas markets. The emergence of new economic powers after the War such as The USA and Japan aswell as

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    finding Germany's allies, as Bismarck himself said, had been full of "perplexities". these "perplexities" could have brought about a Russo-German alliance. But in 1879 and 1882 it seemed that could be successfully avoided. Germany could enter into an alliance with the antagonist of Russia and still keep the Tsardom within Berlin's orbit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work