• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economic consequences of the first world war

Free essay example:

What were the main economic consequences of the First World War?

At the end of the First World War in 1918, the economic state of Europe was in such a perilous condition that the impending rebuilding of the continent seemed such a remote and unrealistic possibility.  The war had devastated much of the Western European economies; the most affected nations were France and Germany, followed by Belgium, Italy and Austria. In addition to the complete economic stagnation of the period throughout much of Western Europe, there were vast regions of Eastern Europe that also suffered greatly. The majority of Europeans suffered in one way or another, Geographical borders changed, industry changed, and demographics changed, all which had severe economic repercussions throughout Europe.  Four years concentration of total war had ravaged and pillaged the European economies, resulting in a massive decline in production. Additionally, Europe had been unable to regain her prominent share in world trade that she enjoyed prior to 1914, nor had she been able to reassert her influence and dominance over overseas markets. The emergence of new economic powers after the War such as The USA and Japan aswell as the rise of Hitler and Lenin, arguably the two most important political characters of the twentieth century, came as a direct result of the war which also had major impacts on the economies of many European nations.  In no way can the impact of the war be underestimated or tamed. At the very least it was a major factor in shaping the world that we live in today.

The First World War completely shattered and devastated many European economies. In Germany alone the cost of the war was estimated at $40 billion USD. When considering the fact that there has subsequently been 87 years of inflation since this expenditure, in modern terms the figure would be closer to $1100 billion USD[1]. The cost of the war was equally high in France and Russia and well into the billions in Italy, Belgium, Britain and Poland.

Another major economic impact of the war was that it narrowed the gap between the economies of both Europe and the United States of America. Despite the USA being well into its industrialization programme and having a steadily growing economy the European economy was still superior to the US economy. However the devastating effects of the First World War resulted in massive economic stagnation and declination, which allowed the US to catch up and bridge the gap. In the period following the War it is estimated that the US economy grew by triple that of Europe’s economy in relative terms[2]. As a result of this economic alteration and switch in economic superiority, investment in Europe fell substantially, which effectively enhanced the problems already facing the economies of the continent. Newly established Asian companies relocated to the US, and many European firms decided to cross the Atlantic to save their businesses. This mass movement and relocation of businesses from Europe to the US inflicted more desolation and misery upon the governments of war torn Europe. The loss of investment resulted in a reduction in the generation of income, which was critically necessary at the time in order to improve and rebuild the devastated economies.

Despite the large-scale economic stagnation and decline that affected many sectors of European economies as a result of the First World War, many European economies were saved by the resurrection and growth of other various industrial sectors. Although the major industries such as textiles and shipbuilding were effectively diminished forever, other industrial sectors such as construction industries and their suppliers flourished thus rendering various European economies susceptible to economic growth and potential future economic prosperity.  The demand for goods such as bricks and tools created the guaranteed outflow of resources, which were critical for laying the necessary foundations to entice economic growth. Therefore some industries were able to capitalise in the aftermath of the war.

The rise in inflation rates and the devaluing of many currencies throughout Europe also prevented the immeadiate recovery of many European economies.  The theory of  “invisible devalue” is often used by historians to describe the period of time after the war where no trading or saving took place, which therefore meant that many currencies throughout Europe were effectively useless.

The First World War also served as the major catalyst that resulted in the rise of communism.  Russia’s failure during the War underlined the need for large-scale changes throughout the nation and these changes found a new face via the emergence of the Bolsheviks and most notably Vladimir Lenin.  Lenin’s implementation of his War Communism economic strategy resulted in the alienation of Russia from mainland Europe and thus the complete destruction of trading links between East and West. In terms of the bigger picture this alienation and destruction of major trading routes further contributed to the economic declination of European economies and further dented the economies of the countries that were active trading partners with Russia.

Economically, the war completely devastated Europe. Every European economy suffered through the war and trading amongst European countries never really recovered. Through the political change in Europe, the economy suffered and this effectively allowed the USA to catch up and overtake the European economy in the preceding years of the war.  Although many short-term problems were created by the war, the long-term problems far outweighed those in the short term. These long-term factors effectively led to the Second World War and the outbreak of the Cold War. Effectively the war shaped the Twentieth Century, as we now know it.

Bibliography

  • Internet website: http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm. Found by searching “impact of the first world war” into a Google search bar.
  • The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3,

How the economy suffered?

  • ‘Social consequences of World War 1: The case of Germany’, A. Marwick, Total War and Social Change.
  • Facing Total War: German Society 1914-1918, J. Kocka

[1]  Source taken from internet website:

http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm.

      Website gives a brief explanation on the impacts of the war in Germany

  [2]  The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and

         Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3, How the economy

         suffered? (after the First World War)


[1]  Source taken from internet website: http://www.schoolshistory.org.uk/ASLevelHistory/week3impactofwar.htm. Website gives a brief explanation on the impacts of the war in Germany

[2]  The Cambridge Economic History of Modern Britain, Roderick Floud and Paul Johnson. Cambridge publication, Volume II. Chapter 3, How the economy suffered?

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

(?)
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Related GCSE History Skills and Knowledge Essays

See our best essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. Summary of John Maynard Keynes' "The Economic Consequences of the Peace".

    Those two articles together destroy the concept of the League as an instrument for progress and peace with a fatal result for the status quo, but, however, articles XI and XVII have the possibility of preventing the war amongst the nations excluding Germany, which was forced to sign for it.

  2. 'The rise and decline of the great powers can be explained by their relative ...

    America, for example, had no formal empire, but instead had 'virtual colonies' such as Puerto Rico, the Philippines, Panama and Cuba, in addition to a group of countries that it effectively 'babysat', such as Mexico, Chile, Argentina, Paraguay and Uruguay.

  1. Causes of World War 2

    Those pastimes are fading legends now Augustus but the twenty years we endured felt like one hundred years of never ending pain. Now we are vulnerable, weak and we are the worlds' laughing stock. As much as this government is corrupt so are the others.

  2. To what extent did nationalism within the Austria-Hungarian Empire contribute to the outbreak of ...

    mainland (a conflict here with the principle of nationality); Arab lands were transferred from Turkey to Britain and France; Italy was given islands in the Aegean. 6. the General principles advanced at the time of the peace treaties were very considerably modified by power-political and other practical considerations (such as in the refusal to allow Austria to unite with Germany).

  1. Questions on World War One.

    The Cordiale was found on the basis of mutual understanding and peace-reserving. An alliance worked only if the interests of the members were touched /involved. Even if there was the absence of the alliance system, the rival powers will come together if there was common interests.

  2. What were the main economic consequences of the First World War

    Additionally, Europe had been unable to regain her prominent share in world trade that she enjoyed prior to 1914, nor had she been able to reassert her influence and dominance over overseas markets. The emergence of new economic powers after the War such as The USA and Japan aswell as

  1. Causes of the First World War

    the army get from one place to another more quickly and also by helping it to become more industrial. Germany was surrounded by the three countries in the Triple Entente. Germany's leaders were worried by this and they started to make military plans, in case France and Russia jointly declared war on them.

  2. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    * This arrangement had violated the Vienna Settlement. Originally, the powers should intervene, but in fact they had taken no action because: * Austria and Russia were busy on their revolution in Italy, Germany and Poland. * France welcomed the independence because she could get economic benefits after Belgium got independent.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work