• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Economic Interests, Fascism and the Start of World War II

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Erin Gaffney Question 4 World War I was supposed to be a ?War to end all wars? and as Woodrow Wilson said, this war was ?to make the world safe for democracy?. This changed quickly when Japan started threatening China and the open door policy, also as the fascist Nazi party under Hitler began to rise and promised the reassertion of German nationalism and militarism. The U.S. under Roosevelt shifted from isolationism and neutrality to disengagement and then into full engagement in World War II because it was unavoidable because of the economic situation and the Fascism aggression in the Axis powers. The first main political movement from neutrality to disengagement was caused by the negative relations between the U.S. and Japan, Fascist Germany and Italy, these negative relations were caused by the latter nations responses to bad economic conditions, and their past war resentments. After World War I, the U.S. had tried to become isolationist and avoid any wars. Proof of this idea, were acts such as the Kelogg-Briand pact. This act was to avoid any wars and it was the beginning of the movement to outlaw war entirely. Of course, this did not work because there was too much tension after World War I and the rise of the Fascist nations prevented any such pact. ...read more.

Middle

Roosevelt maintained neutrality while building up arms. Many isolationists viewed this as preparing for possible invasion of the Western hemisphere where protection is needed. These political acts brought the nation from disengagement into a neutral position in the war because all of these acts were to prevent war or U.S. entry into the war, the situation changes when Roosevelt and the nation begin to realize that war is probably unavoidable. Then the political acts changed from Neutrality and disengagement to full engagement into World War II, because Britain and France got involved in the war, and the relationship between the U.S. and the Axis continued to decline. One of the acts that the U.S. put in place was the ?Cash and Carry? system. This was a switch from neutrality because even though it was theoretically neutral, in use it mostly favored Britain. This was the beginning of the U.S. aid to Britain that would develop and bring the U.S. into the war. Another step away from neutrality, Roosevelt began a war draft even though there was no potential enemy named. This was the Selective Service act of 1940. It began to train troops in the ages 21-35. The U.S. began to arm themselves because the European nations had been so unprepared that they were easily taken. ...read more.

Conclusion

Japan was able to expand in these areas because the European countries were in war and they did not have enough forces to defend their colonies elsewhere. When Japan joined the Axis and began to occupy French Indochina the U.S. began to cut off crucial goods such as steel, iron and oil. Since Japan?s air-force and navy could not run without U.S. oil unless they conquered the oil industries in the Dutch East Indies, they attacked the U.S. naval fleet anchored in Pearl Harbor. Pearl Harbor was the spark of the U.S. entrance into World War II or the start of their full engagement. The War became unavoidable to the U.S. because war had broken out in the European front and the U.S. was being threatened by Japan. This forced the U.S. to move from disengagement to full engagement in to the war because there was no other way to defend our economic interests and protect Europe and Asia from Fascism. World War II was in the cards ever since after World War I because of the anger and want of reassertion of Germany. The U.S. became involved because Japan started to introduce itself as a threat to the U.S. and the fascist dictators had the desire of conquering Europe and Asia and The economic interests of the U.S. got caught in the conflict. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE International relations 1900-1939 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE International relations 1900-1939 essays

  1. The Rise of Nation States in Europe

    * Both Britain and Austria wanted to revise the treaty and threatened to wage war. * In order to deal with the problem of Big Bulgaria, German's Chancellor Bismarck (Germany was unified in 1871)

  2. The Success Of Blitzkrieg II.

    Germany had planned every thing so well in advance that on the 31 August the German troops were already for attack, whilst the Polish were caught still moving towards their concentration points ready for attack. Poland, before they even started, were at a disadvantage because of the fact that it

  1. Questions on World War One.

    He wrote a memo (1901) specifically against joining the Triple Alliance. He put up a very strong case against giving undertakings to other countries. He disliked indefinite undertakings for possible action in hypothetical circumstances at some future data and avoided any entanglements.

  2. Dear Diary, It was the start of the Christmas month and I was ready ...

    They could house around 10 people at a time. The roof of the dugout had a few sheets of corrugated iron so then mud wouldn't drip down on us and to keep the dugout stable. If the war carries on we might need to build bigger and stronger dugouts to protect us and to house loads more soldiers.

  1. Why did World War I start in 1914 and not earlier?

    The Dreikaiserbund laid the basis for further alliances, which all contributed to some extent to the outbreak of WWI, as they entangled the involved countries into unmakable and dissatisfying promises and confusing conditions which couldn't be satisfied by them. One example of this is the Triple Alliance in 20th May

  2. Australia's role in world war II.

    The plan was for the ANZACS to land 21 kilometers north of Cape Helles on a low grassy area that rose gradually to a main hill 7 kilometers away. The first Australian division of 12 000 troops was to be the first to infiltrate the landing on ANZAC cove, take

  1. The Congress of Vienna

    That is the rise of militarism (using force/war to solve problems). - The army became strong and powerful in most of the countries. - All these led to the armaments race and militarism. So there were wars. - Characteristics if the nation states in the 19th century: - 1.

  2. Australia's role in World War II - The Gallipoli Campaign.

    Over 42 000 Turks occupied the ridges, trenches and hills of Gallipoli, all highly trained, well equipped and determined. In fact the boats had landed on a part of the coast that Birdwood and Australian officers had scanned from a warship a few days earlier and considered 'impossible' for an attempt at landing in the dark.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work