• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation in the Second world War.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Britain started preparing for the Second World War very early by building air - raid shelters and beginning to think about evacuation. The country was afraid of loosing more people than to loose in War. The aim was to save as many lives as possible especially, the children in order to save a generation. This provided more space too. The government took precautions as they were expecting 10, 000 casualties per air - raid. Evacuation was not compulsory and many families didn't want to part with their children, whilst others felt more relaxed knowing their children were safe. The government produced propaganda posters to persuade parents to evacuate their children. The nation already witnessed what the German bombers did to Guernica during the Spanish Civil War. Everyone was given a gas mask to carry around with them at all times - including school. In 1937 air - raid precautions were introduced involving blackouts and evacuation of the vulnerable. Its aim was to save as many lives as possible. Britain were criticised for not doing enough during the First World War and had to act in WW2. Evacuation occurred in the bigger cities such as Liverpool and London. This was mainly down to the huge ports in Liverpool used for exchanging goods, and the fact that London is the capital city. ...read more.

Middle

It was written in the 1970's by a British point of view after the War and so all the pieces of evidence can not be exact because it is second hand experience rather than first hand. This is also aimed at children so it has been published for the children piece of mind and not as sophisticated therefore a large number of facts would be absent. The source is a story and lots of events may be imaginary in order to make the book more interesting and appealing to the children. However it is still reliable to some extent in that we know people were evacuated to place they did not enjoy or with people who were forced to let evacuees stay for the duration of the War. Source D is an advertisement to people in Scotland to let evacuees stay with them. It was issued by the Government to persuade families who have not offered a place for evacuees to stay to do so by using propaganda. The source is very persuasive and it makes the reader want to do something for the good of the country. It is very patriotic and passionate when it is talking about helping the country and the children. The picture shows a young girl and a young boy who could be brother and sister hugging one another with a background of fighter planes on one side and a safe countryside on the other. ...read more.

Conclusion

A lot of people did move from a danger zone to a safer part of the country to get a better life. As a result of evacuation many people kept in touch and become close friends because of the things they endured together, especially school children. Another advantage to evacuation was that it brought a lot of people, cities and the country together. The whole country united yet again after the trauma everyone suffered in the past four years. In addition evacuation brought the Beveridge Report, which was housing, sanitation and other similar problems. If evacuation never happened then this wouldn't have happened and the society today would be very different. However, I also feel evacuation did not need to be carried out so long before the War as that only produced more problems. Many people suffered the aftermath of evacuation and were haunted by their memories of what happened throughout the duration of the War. A lot of these individuals needed medical treatment to help them surpass being an evacuee. With all the moving around from one city to another a lot of children's education suffered and were unable to make up for the time they missed out on as a youngster. This would have affected what they did following on from then. ?? ?? ?? ?? Fiona Lomas "Evacuation was a great success" How far do you agree with this interpretation ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Evacuation in Britain during the Second World War

    Hosts, who were just trying to help the war effort, found themselves under a lot of stress and many couldn't cope, so in this way evacuation was not a success. Many of these problems stemmed from evacuees and hosts being in different social classes.

  2. In what ways were people's lives affected by evacuation during the second world war?

    Most would be on the train all day with so many people on the train together it would have been cramped, hot and uncomfortable and often there were no corridors or toilets so accidents were inevitable. * "On that day hundreds of children from Birmingham area assembled at Tyseley station

  1. Why did the British Government decide to evacuate children from Britain(TM)s major cities in ...

    This links to another important cause; the government attitudes. The government had no alternatives as Anderson shelters were not adequate and they did not want to be responsible for the deaths of children as the government might then be labelled 'child murderers'. They also did not want the children to witness the horrifying scenes of war for fear of low morale, another important cause.

  2. Child evacuation during the second world war.

    It shows the evacuees going to the station, which is probably why they are so excited. Source B was taken in 1939 so it might have been used as propaganda to encourage other evacuees to be excited. Source C is taken from an interview in 1988 with someone who was a teacher around evacuation, describing what it was like.

  1. What was the extent of change in the role of the UK government in ...

    The home guard was an excellent accolade to the war effort, but they couldn't do it alone. The government needed women volunteers in the war effort, there was no avoiding it, including the women would double the work force. Their work forces in factories had been severely cut by male conscription into the army.

  2. History Revision for year 11. The Liberal Reforms, the Beveridge Reforms and the ...

    The Beveridge Report In July 1940 the writer J.B. Priestley wrote: I will tell you what we did for servicemen and their young wives at the end of the last war. We did nothing. After the cheering and the flag waving was over, and all the medals were given out,

  1. The Impact of the Second World War on a London Borough: Bexley 1939-1945

    The second account feels exactly the same way in having negative thoughts. Both seem to think that whatever they may do to make themselves safe, any effort will be completely futile. Both these two sources, B and E, are accounts that were made long after the event.

  2. How did the Second World War affect the lives of the people of South ...

    She says that after the funeral of her brothers wife she went to the cemetery to see the grave. she said that when she got there there were five or six open graves and there were soldiers diggingmore. When she asked them who they were for they said they were for the next blitz.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work