• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation was a Great Success

Extracts from this document...


"Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation? Explain your answer using the sources and knowledge from your studies. In September 1939, Evacuation was used to give safety to over a million school children living in the larger cities and towns of Great Britain. They were moved temporarily from their homes to places that the government considered safer usually out in the countryside and the more rural areas. The British Government did this as a safety precaution as they had declared a war with Germany; British towns would be targets for bombing raids by aircraft. Evacuation could be considered a success because many poor inner city children who had never experienced rail travel before were able to travel from outside inner cities. Even fewer children had been to the countryside. Many of the children thought evacuation would be something of a holiday or a great adventure. ...read more.


These both infer that evacuation was not a success. This father however is not the majority of the population so cannot say that most parents did not like evacuation and the statistics are against this father as many children were sent and if the majority of parents didn't agree with evacuation and not sent their child the amount of children sent would definitely be much lower. Source B is a photograph shows a group of children on their way to the train station - which is a large part of evacuation. This also is a part where children weren't told what was happening and were grouped with their schools. All the children seem very happy and posing for the picture. Even though most of the children involved in evacuation were told what was actually happening when they got to the train station. This may be why they seem unusually happy. This source shows evacuation in a positive manner - therefore may show that evacuation was a success as the children weren't upset with the whole operation. ...read more.


It is trying to persuade more families to take in an evacuated child. It is propaganda so it is doubtlessly going to focus only on the positive aspects of the process, and whilst the author will most likely not have directly lied about how good and successful a thing it is, the purpose of the piece would be to try and persuade people into something, so the truth may have been edited slightly or exaggerated. I think that evacuation was a success; many people would agree and call it a 'great success'. Yet, there are those sources in which shows that evacuation wasn't a 'perfect' success. I see it as inevitable that some evacuees had unfriendly or strict foster parents and also, that some evacuees were bad mannered and deviant. Yet the things the government could control ran smoothly, and there were fewer casualties than expected, this surely means it was a success of some sort - yet there is an argument that if the children weren't even sent away that there would be the same decreased number than necessary. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. "Evacuation was a great success"

    On the other hand I would say the evacuation was not reliable because it does not show the children's real feelings and also it might only show one happy photograph. This is enough evidence to show that it was organised but people did not realise.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree? Source based work.

    Many children gained a lot of new experiences and there were many long-term benefits. Some long-term benefits include broadened horizons of the children, increased understanding between classes and a raised awareness of urban poverty. Many country dwellers did not know how city children lived and evacuation was an opportunity for them to find out.

  1. "Evacuation Was A Great Success" Do You Agree Or Disagree With This Interpretation?

    Source F is another interview in 1988 from an evacuee who was evacuated in 1939. This evacuee recalls how host families had an image of the stereotypical evacuee. It was assumed that all evacuees came from poor areas and ate a staple diet of fish and chips.

  2. Was Evacuation A Success

    This suggests the 2 very different places where evacuees could be during the war-The Countryside being Scotland where it is safe and the City being where they are currently living in danger. Underneath the image, there is text underneath the image in large, bold font.

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    source A shows whole classes walking down to the station and source F shows the family make their way through a crowded train station. They are also similar because source F is staged and there is a strong possibility that source A is staged as well.

  2. "Evacuation was a great success" Discuss

    In the source you could see that two children holding tight to each other and also the country behind them are being bombed. The picture has been taken with foster parents and the source is asking the reader do you want children to die in front of your face?

  1. "Evacuation was a great success" Do you agree with this interpretation?

    The aims of source H are clearly for propaganda, with the intension of advertising that, offering your assistance to foster children was 'helping with the war effort'. It can be seen to be bias because of the frequent amount of questions and phrases that are asked on the advertisement, such as "Wont you be one of them?"

  2. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    Additionally, we are again unaware of the purpose for such an inter view and of the identity of the interviewer. It is a secondary source and maintains the issue of memory intervention through the media and the unrelenting effects of 'father time', i.e.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work