• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Evacuation was a great success

Extracts from this document...


'Evacuation was a great success' Do you agree or disagree with this interpretation Explain the answer using the Sources and knowledge from your own studies. In this essay I will be discussing and examining the interpretation 'evacuation was a great success.' Using the Sources available to me and my own knowledge from my studies, I will discuss the different opinions on this topic and reach a conclusion on whether evacuation really was a great success. Evacuation took place in the early months of World War Two. The government decided that people such as children, expectant mothers, and the disabled were to be sent to areas in the countryside deemed safe from the German bombs. The government felt that evacuation was for the best and often publicised the consequences of what might happen if children were not evacuated from danger areas. The evacuees were evacuated by train to smaller towns and villages in the countryside. The United Kingdom was split up into three areas; Evacuation, meaning areas that heavy bombing was expected; Neutral, meaning areas that would not send or receive any evacuees and Reception, which was the rural areas where evacuees would be sent. Evacuation began on the 31st August 1939. Over the next four years, a quarter of the British population was evacuated to the British countryside. ...read more.


However, from just looking at the Source, I would say that this Source was more positive than negative and therefore it does support the opinion that evacuation was a success. However it doesn't have the different crueller side to evacuation. Source D is a photograph issued by the government whilst the war was going on. This means that it is most likely to be a use of propaganda to help boost morale, and therefore is an unreliable Source. By being released during the war, it is likely that it was used to encourage parents to send their children away from danger or back from where they came from as many had been sent back home due to the lack of bombing going on. The Source shows children in the bath, smiling and looking happy. This was used to show the parents how the children there are having a good time and that they were safe, because obviously many parents were very uneasy about sending their children away to a strange place that they didn't know. However, I know from my own knowledge that many children were not happy whilst living at their foster homes and many were bullied and abused by their foster families. However once again, the Source is a positive Source and it was used to encourage evacuation. ...read more.


Source C contradicts Source B because it says how many children were very afraid about the prospect of being evacuated. This also backs up my own knowledge and it is a very negative view of evacuation which contradicts the opinion that evacuation was a great success. In conclusion, after analysing all of the available Sources and by using my own knowledge, it seems that evacuation was not actually a great success, and that it was actually a huge failure. The negative Sources are allot more frequent than the positive Sources and the positive Sources all seem to be an obvious use of propaganda which means that they are not reliable and that they are not a true reflection on the events of evacuation or the feelings of the evacuees. Some Sources say how badly the town people behaved, whereas some others say the country people were just as bad. I believe that although most children were saved from the German bombs, evacuation was not a great success because many children suffered at the hands of their foster parents and evacuation was not very popular with the parents of the evacuated. Overall I believe that some aspects of evacuation were a success, as the government achieved its aim of keeping children safe from the bombs, however, their were allot of negatives and therefore I believe that evacuation was not a complete success. Rory Barham ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Britain 1905-1951 section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Britain 1905-1951 essays

  1. Why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    Source D is quite similar to source A as both sources show a positive attitude to evacuation. Both the sources show happy smiling children giving the impression that children had fun when they were evacuated. The sources are also similar because they both show children being evacuated with friends or family.

  2. Free essay

    why do sources A to F differ in their attitudes to the evacuation of ...

    It is different to source B as source B claims that the children were "too afraid to talk". The source is similar to source C as that source depict children giggling and being happy. Source E is an extract from interview with a father of a seven-year-old child, in May 1940.

  1. How useful is Source G when examining the children's evacuation journey?

    Also, because it was written for children, some of the more gruesome details of evacuation will have been excluded because they would not have been deemed appropriate for children. Therefore Source G is unreliable as evidence about evacuees because important information could have been missed out and other parts of the Source maybe over exaggerated.

  2. Was Evacuation a success?

    I believe this source is very useful as the teacher who is being interviewed is speaking from personal experience as she was there at the time. The interview was taken some time after the evacuation; almost 50 years. So this somewhat makes the useful a little unreliable as it is

  1. Was Evacuation Sucessfull

    safe in the countryside and saved room for people which was an ideal situation for everyone. Carrying on, another positive aspect of having children evacuated to the countryside was the positive experiences of the evacuees. Many of these children who were too young to understand what was going on thought

  2. There are a variety of reasons why people had different interpretations of their evacuation ...

    There were not only these women who had a bad experience. In the book Memoirs of Lord Chandos we are told about his experience of how bad the children who he took in were. He explains how they had no knowledge about hygiene and no respect for anyone.

  1. Evacuation was a great success - do you agree or disagree.

    Indeed, hosts received a lot of bad publicity during the evacuation process, with newspaper publications that portrayed horrific situations where children were being beaten, used and abused, and this host maybe trying to redress the balance.

  2. For this next question I will be exploring weather the quote "evacuation was a ...

    "We hadn't the slightest idea were we where going..." this is obviously telling us that the problem with organisation really was an issue to be thought about. "All you could hear was the feet of the children and a kind of murmur because the children were too afraid to talk."

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work